Dear Mr

               Online Conference Center

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page (for best results, right click to "open in new window")

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

 

Dear Mr. Gallagher:

 
I am writing regarding your article in The Scientist, "Vaccination Undermined."
 
Speaking of "post hoc ergo propter hoc," consider the most widely cited reason for vaccinating:  "Disappearance of disease followed vaccination.  Vaccines caused diseases to disappear."  The pot likes to call the kettle black.
 
Vaccine research itself is filled with junk science and inadequate/inappropriate control groups.  While some critiques of anti-vaccination arguments are correct, those critiques apply to pro-vaccination arguments as well.
 
Helen Tucker
Editor/webmaster
Demand scientific integrity in vaccine research

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page (for best results, right click to "open in new window")

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.