Last Updated: 2003-05-30 17:00:33 -0400 (Reuters Health)
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Maine lawmakers this week approved a bill
requiring prescription drug manufacturers and labelers to file annual reports
disclosing how much they spend to market their drugs.
If Gov. John Baldacci signs the bill, Maine would become only the second
state, after Vermont, to enact a pharmaceutical marketing disclosure law.
Democratic State Rep. Tom Kane, the bill's sponsor, said the measure is one
of several before the state legislature aimed at lowering drug costs by
requiring greater transparency from pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacy
benefit managers and insurers.
Drugmakers insist the prices of their products reflect the costs of research
and development, but skeptics believe the industry spends excessively on
marketing and advertising. Kane hopes to shed some light on the issue by
requiring drug companies to break out their marketing costs.
"It's basically placing as many cards as possible face up on the table so
there can be no denial about the amount of money that's spent," he said.
The bill requires disclosure of all advertising, marketing and promotions
expenditures, including educational materials, food and entertainment and free
drug samples. It exempts expenses of $25 or less.
"It's not going to immediately lower the cost of prescriptions, but it gives
the consumer an advantage of understanding of what's being spent," said John
Carr, president of the Maine Council of Senior Citizens, which lobbied for the
bill's passage.
"In the long run all of those giveaways actually add to the cost of drugs,"
he added.
The bill would take effect Jan. 1, 2004. Manufacturers or labelers of
prescription drugs distributed to Maine residents would have to file a report
with the state Department of Human Services by July 1 each year disclosing their
marketing expenses.
A company that fails to file a report could be fined $10,000.
Bruce Lott, a spokesman for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America (PhRMA), said the legislation is "aimed at a problem that doesn't
exist." He said the bill creates "an unnecessary burden for manufacturers" as
well as for the state agency required to receive the reports "and it will
provide no useful information."
Lott noted that PhRMA's board last summer unanimously adopted a voluntary
code of ethics banning drug company representatives from lavishing doctors with
free trips, tickets to theater or sporting events and expensive dinners.
Maine has been particularly vigilant in efforts to curb prescription drug
expenses. The U.S. Supreme Court recently cleared the way for the state to
implement a program allowing the state to wrest discounts from drugmakers to
provide prescription drugs for residents who don't have drug coverage. Firms
that refuse to negotiate with the state could have their products placed under
"prior authorization," meaning doctors must seek special permission to obtain
Medicaid coverage for those drugs.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"