|
UK agency says MMR vaccine
study "seriously flawed"
By Richard Woodman
Last Updated:
2003-05-23 10:05:47 -0400 (Reuters Health)
LONDON
(Reuters Health) - Britain's medicines agency has
condemned as "seriously flawed" a study showing that
measles mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccination is
associated with a greater risk of autism than
diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP) vaccination.
The study, by
U.S. geneticist Dr. Mark Geier and his son, David Geier,
based in Silver Springs, Maryland, was widely publicised
this week in Britain, where controversy has raged for
years over the safety of the triple MMR jab.
It uses data
from the United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System, and estimates of doses of MMR and DTP vaccines
distributed, to calculate the relative risk of autism
and other brain conditions following MMR and DTP
vaccination.
The results,
published in the journal International Pediatrics,
suggest that almost 25 million first doses of MMR were
given in the US between 1994 and 2000, compared with 63
million for DTP.
Yet there
were 29 reports of autism among boys and eight among
girls following MMR -- five times more than with DTP.
British
anti-MMR campaigners said the findings vindicated their
warnings that MMR vaccination was associated with the
rising number of children being diagnosed with autism.
But Professor
Alasdair Breckenridge, chairman of the Medicines and
Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, said in a
statement: "In no way are the conclusions of the authors
of this study justified.
"These data
simply cannot be used to determine whether an adverse
event is causally linked to vaccination. The data in
this study have been misused and the methodology is
seriously flawed."
The agency
said the study failed to take into account the
limitations and biases of the data, including the
possibility that adverse events were reported because of
publicity about an alleged adverse reaction.
It noted that
in the U.S., DTP vaccine is given at 2, 4, 6 and 15-18
months and MMR is first given at 12-15 months. "It is
essential that children of similar age are compared,"
according to the statement. "Indeed, age imbalances in
the groups would be sufficient to make the results
invalid."
Copyright 2002 Reuters.
Click for Restrictions.
|