May 23, 2003
BOSTON (Harvard School of
Public Health) -- Using a
computer model to quantify and
predict the spread of severe
acute respiratory syndrome
(SARS), researchers at Harvard
School of Public Health have
determined that the virus has a
real potential to spread widely
but can be effectively
controlled-- even without a
vaccine or drug treatment--
through public health measures
including quarantine, isolation
of sick patients and stringent
protection of hospital
personnel.
The results appear in an
expedited release by Science
magazine at
www.sciencemag.org or
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/rapidpdf/1086616v1.pdf
that is free to the public.
The paper is entitled
“Transmission Dynamics and
Control of Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome.”
Using detailed epidemiologic
data from Singapore and the
epidemic curves from other
settings, the researchers, led
by Marc Lipsitch and Megan
Murray, both assistant
professors of epidemiology at
HSPH, estimated that a single
infectious case of SARS will
infect about three secondary
cases in a population that has
not yet instituted control
measures.
SARS has spread widely since
November, 2002 and probable
cases have been reported in 31
countries, with extensive
ongoing transmission in Taiwan
and China and major outbreaks
that are now under control in
Singapore, Vietnam and Canada.
The World Health Organization
today also lifted its travel
advisory to Hong Kong and
Guangdong Province in China,
where local transmission has
been controlled, leaving
transmission only in hospital
settings.
The cause of SARS appears to
be a new kind of coronavirus.
“Our study shows in a
quantitative way that SARS could
have spread very widely and
still could,” said Murray. “It
has the potential to do so, and
we need to take stringent
control measures, quickly and
effectively.”
“It’s very close to
unprecedented to have stopped an
outbreak of a respiratory
disease without any biological
interventions such as a vaccine
or drugs,” said Lipsitch. “While
we have a lot of uncertainty
that SARS can be completely
controlled, this model gives us
reasonable hope.”
While highly infectious, SARS
is less infectious than other,
common respiratory diseases such
as measles where a single case
might generate 15 to 17 other
cases; a case of chicken pox
would result in 6 to 8 secondary
cases. Smallpox, which was
eradicated in 1977, was just
slightly less infectious than
chicken pox. A disease would
have to be kept to an infection
rate of less than 1 to be
eventually eliminated.
Still, said Lipsitch, SARS,
with a rate of 3 infections,
would be expected to create a
very large number of cases in
the absence of any control
methods. “We still need to know
in the big outbreaks in China
and Taiwan a person-by-person
accounting of the transmission
circumstances,” he said. “And in
order to make control more
effective, we need to find out
more precisely when people
become infectious, how that
infectiousness changes over time
and when they stop being
infectious.”
Other uncertain aspects of
SARS crucial to knowing if the
virus might return include
whether the virus proves to be
seasonal; whether it exists in
an animal reservoir from which
it could be reintroduced; and
whether people who recover from
SARS retain any immunity. With
other coronaviruses, including
some kinds of the common cold,
people acquire short term,
temporary immunity.
The researchers analyzed the
first 205 probable cases of SARS
reported in Singapore to obtain
relevant epidemiologic
parameters. They saw a rapid
decline in secondary cases in
the second week of the outbreak
there, coinciding with the
application of control measures,
including isolation of SARS
cases and quarantine of their
asymptomatic contacts.
Ironically, because control
measures were rapidly applied in
Singapore, the researchers found
too few data there to provide a
reliable estimate of the
infectiousness of SARS prior to
the institution of control
measures. They therefore
estimated the rate of secondary
infections from the rate of
exponential growth in the number
of cases in several other
settings.
The researchers conclude that
an achievable combination of
control measures can contain
SARS as demonstrated in Canada,
Singapore, Vietnam and, most
recently, Hong Kong and
Guangdong. But, they warn that
“On the other hand, in the
absence of such effective
measures, SARS has the potential
to spread very widely.”
Other contributors to the
article included James Robins,
Professor of Epidemiology at
HSPH, and researchers from the
Ministry of Health, Singapore,
McMaster Hospital in Hamilton,
Ont., the City of Hamilton
Public Health and Community
Service Department, the
University of Utah and
Massachusetts General Hospital.