Return to Vaccination News Home Page
Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter
View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)
Search This Site using keywords
http://www.msnbc.com/news/916441.asp
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
GRANDPARENTS CAN PLAY an important role in the raising of their
grandchildren, and the bond between a grandparent and a grandchild
may be as loving and nurturing as a parent’s bond. In today’s
family, the grandparent may provide daycare support if both parents
work or financial support if the parents can’t make ends meet. But
with death, divorce and single parent homes, sometimes the desire of
grandparents to maintain a relationship with their grandchildren
conflicts with the wishes of the custodial parent. This article will
help you understand the rapidly changing rights of grandparents. THE RIGHTS OF GRANDPARENTS HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE TIMELY With more divorces, single-parent homes, unmarried parents and remarriages, family life has become more complicated. Care for children is at a premium, especially in single-parent homes or in families where both parents work outside of the home. In these situations, grandparents may have developed relationships with their grandchildren, which may be stronger than the traditional relationships. As grandparents live longer and their relationships with their grandchildren grow deeper, their desire to be with their grandchildren — in the face of death or divorce where the surviving or custodial parent doesn’t want such a relationship — has become a difficult societal issue. Grandparents may have developed nurturing and loving relationships with their grandchildren, which they don’t want to see end just because their child may have died or no longer has custody of their grandchildren. PARENTS’ RIGHTS TO RAISE THEIR CHILDREN ARE NOT ABSOLUTE Parents have an almost unfettered right to make key decisions relating to their children, but the right is not absolute. There are many cases in which the states limit parental rights to raise their children as they see fit. For example, with respect to laws regarding school attendance, child labor, driving cars, the use of child safety seats while driving, and the vaccination of children, the state’s interest in the health and welfare of the community supersedes parental rights because there are no severe restrictions on the parents in these instances. In many situations, the needs of children to maintain relationships with grandparents may outweigh parental concerns, and many states have said that permitting grandparents to visit their grandchildren is a minor imposition on parental rights. What must be examined in most cases is what is “in the best interests of the child.” That is exactly the issue that the U.S. Supreme Court addressed in the Troxel case, decided in 2000: Do competent parents have a constitutional right to deny grandparents visitation with their children, and does the state have the right to order visitation over a parent’s objection if it is determined that grandparent visitation is in the children’s best interest? Unfortunately, this decision seems to have brought more confusion than clarity to the issue. STATES DEAL DIFFERENTLY WITH THE VISITATION RIGHTS OF GRANDPARENTS Yes, but the laws are being challenged, and visitation rights are changing. Since the Supreme Court decision, more than ten states have ruled their visitation laws unconstitutional. For example, lawsuits currently in Michigan and New Jersey are testing the legal right of a grandparent to sue for visits with their grandchildren. Groups like the AARP filed a “friend of the court” brief in the New Jersey Supreme Court in support of grandparent visitation rights. Experts are concerned because decisions are not consistent from state to state. The trend is going against grandparent visitation rights, because as some experts have said, parental rights to raise their children had eroded too far and the erosion had to stop. As a result, when grandparents do go to court, they are not winning as much as they once did. Even in states where the visitation laws remain “constitutional,” the courts have substantially narrowed them. |
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||
Return to Vaccination News Home Page
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.