|
Public health
New MMR link to
autism, claims study
James Meikle,
health correspondent
Wednesday May 21, 2003
The Guardian
Researchers in America provided new ammunition for opponents of the
combined MMR vaccine for children yesterday by suggesting that there
was a significant link between the triple jab and increased reports
of brain diseases.
A report in the online medical journal International Paediatrics
said the relative risk of autism in a child was five times higher
after administration of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine than
for DTP, another combined vaccine, against diptheria, tetanus and
pertussis (whooping cough).
British groups campaigning for single vaccines said that the
study justified their concerns. But the findings were dismissed as
flawed by the Department of Health and the government's health
protection agency (HPA).
The research was conducted by Dr Mark Geier and his son, David
Geier, based in Silver Springs, Maryland. They have made several
studies of reported adverse reactions to vaccines.
Dr Geier, president of the Genetics Centers of America, and Mr
Geier, president of MedCon, a medical-legal consultancy, examined a
database set up by the centre for disease control.
According to the database, almost 25 million first doses of MMR
were given to children between 1994 and 2000, compared with 63
million for DTP. Of the MMR doses, there were 133 reports of
suspected neurological problems, autism, brain damage and loss of
coordination. There were 29 reports of autism among boys and eight
among girls - five times higher than for DTP.
The study said that improvements needed to be made to the MMR
vaccine to increase its safety, but failing that, parents ought to
be offered single jabs for their children.
Andrew Wakefield, the doctor who first suggested MMR's link with
autism five years ago, said that the report made the current
practice of refusing individual vaccines "untenable".
Dr Mary Ramsay, a consultant epidemiologist at the HPA, said:
"This research is seriously flawed. It compares children of
different ages who have received different vaccines and the
conclusions are incorrect. |