Chinese scientists must test wild animals to find the host of SARS
Scott Gottlieb
New York
Researchers believe that the coronavirus that causes severeacute
respiratory syndrome (SARS) in humans probably originatedin an
animal in southern China.
Possible hosts for the SARS virus includebears, monkeys, and the endangered pangolin
(above)
MICHAELPITTS/NATUREPL
That was the conclusion drawn by a group of experts meetingat the
New York Academy of Sciences to discuss the originsof SARS and the
state of development of a vaccine or antiviraldrug to help quell the
virus.
SARS has killed 642 people and infected 7860 across the world.No
one understands why SARS makes some people sicker than othersand why
some people seem to be more likely to spread it toothers.
It could be linked to stress or to infection with somethingelse
as well as SARS, such as influenza or hepatitis, researcherssaid.
Co-infection with other infections is known to worsencoronavirus
infection in farm animals. The disease's long incubation
periodestimated to be two to 10 days, or even 14 daysmakesthe
virus perfect for travel. It gives infected individualsenough time
to go elsewhere before they get sick.
Experts who examined the genetic map of the SARS virus say that
although it is related to the three families of coronavirusesthat
cause respiratory and gastrointestinal disease in animals,it is
different enough to make up its own, fourth family.
"I think it jumped from an animal, but we don't know which one," said Kathryn
Holmes, a molecular biologist at the Universityof Colorado Health
Sciences Center who has studied coronavirusesextensively. "The
question is how much change does there needto be for a virus to jump
to a new host," she said.
Dr Holmes expressed optimism that the carrier animal could be
found in Guangdong province, where the first SARS cases occurredlast
November. Animals such as bears, monkeys, and the endangeredpangolin
are sold in the markets there for food. Investigatorswill take blood
from all the animals in that region and testthe blood for the virus,
she said. Dr Holmes said there are many ways the virus could have leapt from the
animal populationto humans, including handling or eating the animal
or contaminationfrom faecal waste.
As the SARS virus does not resemble any known coronaviruses,the
virus is unlikely to have its origins in a domestic animalor any
animals that have become important parts of commerce,such as cows,
chickens, or pigs. Two human coronaviruses causeabout 30% of common
colds, but the viruses cause more importantdiseases in pigs,
chickens, and other livestock. Many of thecommon coronaviruses found
in these animals have already beenidentified.
Researchers believe that many coronaviruses exist in wild species
of animals but remain unknown to scientists because nobodyhas had a
reason to look for them.
Linda Saif, a researcher at Ohio State University's Agricultural
Research and Development Center, agreed, saying that Chinese
scientists should test wild animals as this particular coronavirus
has not been seen in more common household animals such ascats,
chickens, or pigs. Although scientists have not yet foundthe SARS
virus in a particular animal, Professor Saif said they have derived valuable
clues from studying other animal coronavirusessomeencouraging data
and some more worrisome.
"Shipping fever," an illness that affects cattle when they travel from farm
to feed lot, shows some parallels to patientswith SARS whose illness
may have been exacerbated by the stressof travel, she noted. In some
animals, the coronavirus reappearsand reinfects them, raising
concerns about the future healthof survivors of SARS.
Perhaps most alarming, Professor Saif said, was one recent experiment showing
that pigs infected with both the coronavirus and flubecame much
sicker than those infected with just the coronavirus.
With reference to the recent cases of avian flu in people inthe
Netherlands, she said: "You can imagine what would happenif both
these viruses infected people together."
"The question remains, what was its host?" Dr Holmes said. "Was it a virus in
a host that can affect both the host andhumans, or was it a mutation
that caused it to jump to humansand it's no longer able to infect
its host?" she said. "Inthe first scenario, you still have a
reservoir for the virus,"Dr Holmes said. "In the latter scenario,
you can contain it.But we just don't know."
The SARS virus comes from a family of viruses called RNA viruses,
which are known to naturally undergo a high degree of mutation.Some
researchers believe that as the SARS virus doesn't resembleany known
coronavirus, it could have evolved separately.
Although researchers agree that finding the origin of SARS could
hasten the development of an effective vaccine or antiviraldrug,
they say that promising treatments are already in development.Dr
David Ho, president of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Cancer Centerin New
York, described his early success using fusion inhibitors,a drug
technique commonly associated with AIDS treatments, for targeting the SARS
virus.
"It's pretty clear from our initial set of experiments thatthis
concept is as valid for SARS as has been noted for HIV,"Dr Ho said.
"It's something that could potentially be developedquickly," he
said.
Dr Frederick Hayden of the University of Virginia School of
Medicine in Charlottesville said that antivirals could providean
important adjunct to the vaccines that researchers are tryingto
develop. "Protracted viral replication tells us that anantiviral can
have considerable good in this case," he said.
On Saturday, another group of more than 40 experts convenedby the
World Health Organization ended the meeting with a messageof hope,
saying that early detection and isolation of caseshad already
brought outbreaks in Hanoi, Toronto, Singapore,and Hong Kong under
control and should eventually contain thedisease in China and
Taiwan.
Other related articles in BMJ:
NEWS United Kingdom has its first confirmed case of SARS.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"