Press Association
Tuesday May 20, 2003
The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) today ejected a press conference
on a study that showed a link between the MMR jab and autism from
its headquarters because it feared being seen as endorsing the
findings.
The American researchers were told to leave the RCN's head
offices in central London when they arrived to set up their press
conference early this morning.
A spokesman for the researchers said RCN officials gave them only
a few minutes to pack up and find another venue.
The research, published today in the medical journal
International Pediatrics, found a significant link between the
mumps, measles and rubella jab and autism compared with another
triple jab given to children.
But an RCN spokeswoman said the college could not be seen to be
endorsing the findings in any way.
She said: "People would have implied that the RCN considered the
MMR vaccine to be unsafe, which isn't the case. We are very
supportive of MMR.
"Therefore it did not seem appropriate for us to host this press
conference."
The spokeswoman said college officials only knew the content of
the report late last night, although the researchers dispute this.
The authors, Dr Mark Geier and David Geier, drew their findings
from a database set up by the US centres for disease controls and
protection to enable health workers to report adverse reactions to
childhood vaccines.
The study looked at reports of suspected neurological problems
after the MMR jab and the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP)
combined vaccine.
Between 1994 and 2000 almost 25m first doses of MMR and around
63m doses of DTP were given to children.
Among those given MMR, there were 133 reports of suspected
neurological problems such as autism, mental retardation or brain
damage.
There were 29 reports of autism among boys, eight among girls and
the relative risk was five times higher in those given MMR compared
to DTP.
The authors concluded that MMR was associated with a marked
increase in neurological disorders compared to the DTP vaccine.
They said the MMR programme should carry on but using dead
instead of live forms of the viruses.
UK groups campaigning for single vaccines said the study
justified their concerns about the jab and called for a public
inquiry into its use.
Jonathan Harris, of the campaigning group Jabs, said the study
"completely vindicates the concerns of both the parents and carers
of the children affected".
"We now call upon the government to hold a public inquiry and
conduct a total review of their childhood vaccination programme and
to suspend the use of MMR whilst further independent studies are
made and make single vaccinations available on the NHS."
But the health protection agency (HPA) and the Department of
Health (DoH) said the study was seriously flawed.
Dr Mary Ramsay, consultant epidemiologist at the HPA, said: "This
research is seriously flawed - it compares children of different
ages who have received different vaccines and the conclusions are
incorrect."
She said MMR was given at 15 to 18 months of age whereas DTP
vaccinations were given at two, four and six months.
"Regardless of the other weaknesses of the data, the failure to
compare children of the same age is enough to explain the apparent
excess of cases reported in the MMR group," she said.
Dr Ramsay said the findings contrasted dramatically with other
studies that have used valid methods and found no increased risk of
autism following the MMR jab.
The link between MMR, autism and bowel disorders was first raised
by Dr Andrew Wakefield in 1998.
Dr Wakefield, who is now the chief medical scientist for
Visceral, a charity which funds research into bowel problems and
autism, said: "Based on this study and others, it is now untenable
for the DoH to refuse parents a right to choose the individual
vaccines in preference to the MMR for their children."
According to recent research by Cardiff University's school of
journalism, media and cultural studies, almost all scientific
experts reject the claim of a link between the MMR and autism.