Bacterial replacement therapy: adapting 'germ warfare' to infection prevention

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

 

http://reviews.bmn.com/journals/atoz/latest?uid=TIBTECH.bmn06330_01677799_v0021i05_03000854

 

Trends in Biotechnology     Trends



Full A-Z Journal ListVol. 21, No. 5, May 2003Full Text Record

 


 
Bacterial replacement therapy: adapting 'germ warfare' to infection prevention

John R. Tagg 1 john.tagg@stonebow.otago.ac.nz and Karen P. Dierksen 2
Trends in Biotechnology 2003, 21:217-223

[1] Department of Microbiology, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand[2] Department of Bioengineering, Oregon State University, Gilmore 122, Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA
 

Text only, + thumbnails, + full figures, PDF
Publications by
Karen P. Dierksen | John R. Tagg
Related fulltext articles on BioMedNet


 
 Article Outline  
 Abstract  

 

The individual bacterial members of our indigeneous microbiota are actively engaged in an on-going battle to prevent colonisation and overgrowth of their terrain by competing microbes, some of which might have pathogenic potential for the host. Humans have long attempted to intervene in these bacterial interactions. Ingestion of probiotic bacteria, particularly lactobacilli, is commonly practiced to promote well-balanced intestinal microflora. As bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has increased, so too has research into colonisation of human tissues with specific effector strains capable of out-competing known bacterial pathogens. Recent progress is particularly evident in the application of avirulent Streptococcus mutans to the control of dental caries, alpha hemolytic streptococci to reduction of otitis media recurrences and Streptococcus salivarius to streptococcal pharyngitis prevention.





Documentation showing that relatively harmless microorganisms could be introduced into the indigenous microbiota of humans either to enhance resistance to or to treat infection dates from the very origins of microbiology. In 1877, Pasteur and his associate Joubert, noting suppression of anthrax bacillus growth in co-cultures with 'common bacilli' (probably Escherichia coli), commented that ''these facts perhaps justify the highest hopes for therapeutics'' [1]. In the early years of the next century, there followed a series of brave attempts by physicians to afford protection against diseases such as tuberculosis, anthrax and diphtheria by dosing patients with putatively innocuous commensal bacteria [2]. However, except for the treatment of minor ailments or as supplemental therapy, the application of so-called 'bacteriotherapy' or 'bacterioprophylaxis' was largely discontinued on the spectacular advent of antibiotics. For a time it seems that both physicians and the public became rather complacent about our potential bacterial adversaries; therapeutic antibiotics were perceived to be omnipotent – the panaceas for all bacterial ills. Within the span of a single human generation many bacterial species adapted to their antibiotic-laced ecosystems and variants flourished that are capable of resisting our most potent designer antimicrobials. The medical community must now face the reality that most chemotherapeutic agents are probably destined for a relatively short half-life of effectiveness. This dilemma might increasingly encourage us to reconsider the Pasteur approach that bacteria themselves could be our most effective allies as we continue to confront the relatively small but resilient band of miscreant microbes capable of causing infections in man and other animals [3].

Ever since probiotics were made prominent by the flamboyant Eli Metchinikoff, the practice of regular ingestion of intestinal commensals (especially lactobacilli) to confer health-promoting benefits has been commonly used by humans and for various farmed animals [4]. One beneficial side-effect of long-term ingestion of probiotic lactobacilli reported recently is an apparent reduction in dental caries [5]. In general, however, probiotic principles have not been widely applied to the specific protection of other body surfaces against bacterial infection. Several small groups of dedicated adherents to the principles of replacement therapy have, however, initiated pilot studies aimed at protecting the human host against development of otitis media [6], dental caries [7] and urogenital tract infections [8] or against infection by Streptococcus pyogenes [9,10] and Staphylococcus aureus [11]. Although the outcomes have been reported to be promising, none of these studies has resulted in widespread acceptance and routine application of replacement therapy principles as a preventative regimen. One mitigating factor might be the ethical consideration that even reputedly low-virulence colonising strains might sometimes cause infections in immune-compromised individuals. Undaunted however, some of these groups have continued to explore the application of 'friendly bacteria' to infection control and it appears that momentum is now gathering, particularly for the control of three of the most common bacterial infections of childhood: dental caries, otitis media and streptococcal pharyngitis ( Table 1).

 

Table 1. Bacteria tested as potential 'effectors' for replacement therapy
     
Effector species     Inhibitory agent     Investigator    
Ref.    
Dental caries    
S. mutans JH1000 and derivatives     Mutacin 1140     Hillman    
19,22,23     
     
L. rhamnosus GG     Not defined     Nase    
5    
     
S. equi subspecies zooepidemicus     Zoocin A     Simmonds    
17,49     
     
S. salivarius TOVE-R     Not defined     Kurasz    
14    
     
E. faecalis     Bacteriocin     Gilmore    
16    
Otitis media    
Mixture of S. sanguinis, S. mitis, and S. oralis     Not defined     Roos, Tano    
6,35     
Streptococcal pharyngitis    
S. salivarius K12     Salivaricins A2 and B     Tagg    
10,47,48     
     
Mixture of S. sanguinis and S. mitis     Not defined     Roos    
9    


 
 
 Underlying principles of replacement therapy  

The accessible surfaces of the skin, oral cavity, upper respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract and vagina of healthy vertebrates are colonized by microbes soon after birth. What generally follows is an orderly, site-specific succession of microbial acquisitions and eliminations as the populations of indigenous microbes evolve to form climax communities – highly stable menageries of microbes perfectly adapted to life in each particular ecosystem. Collectively known as the normal microflora or indigenous microbiota, these microbes are the body's first line of defense – our personal army of protectors – with a keen interest in our well-being because our healthy tissues constitute their preferred homeland.

The basis of replacement therapy is the implantation and persistence within the normal microflora of relatively innocuous 'effector' bacteria that can competitively exclude or prevent the outgrowth of potentially disease-causing bacteria, without significantly disturbing the balance of the existing microbial ecosystem [12] ( Box 1). Sometimes the mechanisms operating in situ to confer host protection in documented instances of replacement therapy or microbial interference are not known, as exemplified by the relatively harmless S. aureus strain 502A [13] and the rough colony variant strain of Streptococcus salivarius known as TOVE-R ( Fig. 1), which has anti-Streptococcus mutans action in vivo [14]. Nevertheless, it is generally considered that mechanisms contributing to microbial interference might typically include either the greater ability of the effector bacterium to adhere to surfaces and to compete with others for limited space and key nutrients or the superior capability of that bacterium to produce and be resistant to a variety of anti-competitor molecules, some relatively non-specific in their targeting (e.g. acids, hydrogen peroxide) and others (e.g. bacteriocins, bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances (BLIS) and bacteriophages) apparently principally targeted against relatively similar bacteria ( Fig. 2).
Box 1
View Box


 

Fig. 1.
A mitis-salivarius agar culture of S. salivarius strain TOVE showing both smooth and rough colony forms. Modified from [10].


 
Fig. 2.
Simultaneous antagonism test demonstrating several bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance (BLIS)-producing bacteria inhibiting the growth of a lawn culture of Micrococcus luteus.


 
 
 Dental caries  
 

On the basis of several decades of epidemiological observations and laboratory-based research, S. mutans, and to a lesser extent Streptococcus sobrinus, are now generally considered the principal etiological agents of dental caries in humans. Two attributes of these so-called mutans streptococci (MS) that are particularly relevant to their involvement in caries are their production of large quantities of acid from dietary carbohydrate and their formation from sucrose of highly-branched extracellular polysaccharides (glucans) that help trap acidic metabolites within the plaque matrix. According to the acidogenic theory of dental caries the products of bacterial fermentation, particularly lactic acid, mediate the development of caries – reducing the pH of the microenvironment of the tooth surface below the critical threshold at which dissolution of the mineral phase of enamel and dentine is initiated. The weakened surface eventually cavitates to form a clinically evident lesion.

Attempts to devise a microbial interference-based strategy to prevent dental caries first focused on identifying relatively non-pathogenic oral commensals capable of inhibiting growth of the majority of MS [15]. Unfortunately, with the notable exception of certain enterococci [16], S. salivarius [14] and Streptococcus equi subspecies zooepidemicus [17], the strongest producers of anti-MS activity appear to be other strains of MS [18].

Most progress in this field has been made by Jeffrey Hillman's group [19]. The rationale behind their studies is that relatively avirulent strains of MS are most likely to occupy the same ecological niche in plaque as their more cariogenic counterparts. Previous studies demonstrated that it is difficult to achieve persistent colonization of plaque with laboratory strains of MS, particularly in subjects already harbouring indigenous MS [20]. Indeed horizontal transfer of MS, even between close contacts, is a rare event other than for a period of several months following the onset of tooth eruption when children tend to acquire MS strains from their primary caregiver [21]. This 'window of infectivity' period is the preferred time to attempt implantation of MS effector strains [7]. Hillman's concept, however, was that the tooth surface might be more readily colonized by a naturally occurring or genetically engineered MS effector strain that was not only relatively avirulent (i.e. weakly cariogenic) but also highly competitive, owing to its production of anti-MS BLIS activity. The strains selected for further development as the effector for MS replacement therapy were S. mutans JH1000 and its tetracycline-resistant mutant JH1001 [22]. Strain JH1000 produced potent BLIS activity in vitro that was inhibitory to a wide variety of Gram-positive species, including all but one of 125 tested MS [23]. Several mutants (eg. JH1005 and JH1140) of this strain producing increased levels of BLIS were used in human subjects to demonstrate that colonization efficacy and persistence correlated directly with the level of BLIS production [24]. The epidermin-like lantibiotic mutacin 1140 has now been isolated from strain JH1140 [25] and its primary structure elucidated [26].

Strain JH1001 and its derivatives have strong colonization properties in humans. For example, strain JH1005 was apparently retained for 14 years in some subjects following a single application, and moreover appeared to competitively exclude colonization with all other S. mutans strains [27]. The major problem with the use of strain JH1001 and its BLIS-enhanced derivatives in replacement therapy is that these strains, being highly acidogenic MS, are themselves potentially cariogenic.

Parallel studies by the same group explored techniques for reducing the cariogenicity of potential effector strains. Although mutants exhibiting defects in glucan synthesis have reduced cariogenicity in animal models, they are unlikely to compete successfully with glucan-synthesizing strains for prime plaque locations [28]. Thus, attention was focused on the introduction of mutations affecting acid production [19]. Although lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) mutants of the MS species Streptococcus rattus produced less lactic acid and had reduced cariogenicity in rodent models [29], this type of mutation was lethal in S. mutans. However, insertion of a Zygomonas mobilis gene encoding alcohol dehydrogenase helped overcome the LDH deficiency. The construction of the proposed replacement therapy strain BCS3-L1 involved insertion of the Z. mobilis gene into strain JH1140, followed by deletion of virtually all of the LDH gene [19]. This produced a strain that combined the traits of low acid production and strong mutacin production. Colonization trials in rats indicated that strain BCS3-L1 performed at least as well as strain JH1140 – indicating that it could also be effective in humans.

Issues still to be addressed:
  1. Strain BCS3-L1 forms more plaque when grown in vitro in the presence of sucrose than strain JH1140 does, probably reflecting a pH-related effect on glucosyl transferase activity [19]. However, small increases in glucan formation in situ are not anticipated to result in significantly more plaque formation or plaque-associated disease (e.g. gingivitis).
  2. Although reversion to LDH production (resulting in a strongly competitive cariogenic strain) following natural transformation of the effector strain is considered unlikely, it nevertheless constitutes a potential objection to implantation of LDH mutants. Further engineering of strain BSC3-L1 (deletion of comE) is currently being undertaken to cripple its transformation capability [27].
  3. The toxicity of mutacin 1140 has not yet been directly tested but the molecule is broadly similar to the lantibiotic nisin, which has been widely used as a food preservative for decades. Furthermore, no treatment-related lesions have been detected in the organs of rats colonized with mutacin 1140 producers [19].
  4. The potent mutacin output and different fermentation profile of strain BCS3-L1 could upset plaque ecology and result in the proliferation of organisms with pathogenic potential. Interestingly, however, the initial colonization studies with mutacin 1140-producing strains indicated apparent high specific inhibitory activity of the mutacin in situ. Exclusion of other MS was reported, with little or no other detectable modification to the total composition and balance of the subjects' plaque microbiota [24]. This high specificity contrasts dramatically with the broad activity spectrum of mutacin 1140 when tested in vitro [23]. These findings indicate that BLIS-producing bacteria do not necessarily eliminate all sensitive co-inhabitants in complex ecosystems, such as dental plaque. Presumably the distinct micro-habitats found within complex biofilms, and the differing physiological growth states of the inhabitants enable the individual members of heterogeneous populations to co-exist, despite incompatibilities they might display in more homogeneous environments such as laboratory cultures.



 

 Otitis media  
 

Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common bacterial infection in young children (peak age 1–2 years), with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and less often Moraxella catarrhalis and S. pyogenes commonly implicated. The causative bacteria typically translocate from the nasopharynx to the middle ear via the eustachian tube [30]. Many children seem predisposed to recurrent otitis media and the principal strategies to provide protection against repeat infections are antibiotic prophylaxis and fitting of tympanostomy tubes. However, the increasing numbers of antibiotic resistant pathogens raises questions about net benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis. Moreover, such prophylaxis will inevitably affect the balance of normal nasopharyngeal microflora, facilitating colonization with pathogens. Placement of tympanostomy tubes can be effective but is expensive and involves the recognized risks of general anaesthesia and surgery [6].

Several studies have reported higher numbers of alpha streptococci in the nasopharynx of healthy children when compared with children who are prone to AOM [31–33] . In addition, the alpha streptococci from the openings of eustachian tubes appeared more likely to have interfering activity against AOM pathogens than those isolated from the adenoid tissue [34]. Subsequently, a nasal spray containing five alpha streptococci (two Streptococcus sanguinis, two Streptococcus mitis and one Streptococcus oralis) showing in vitro inhibitory activity against AOM pathogens when tested in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study significantly reduced the recurrence rate of AOM and frequency of secretory otitis media [6]. Significantly, the children enrolled in this study were given antibiotic for 10 days before use of either the streptococcal or placebo spray.

In a similar study with no prior use of antibiotics, there was no significant decrease in the levels of AOM pathogens or protection against repeat episodes of AOM afforded children treated with the alpha streptococcal spray [35]. This highlights the problems involved in modifying the normal microflora of the nasopharynx in the absence of antibiotic intervention. To date, the nature of the interfering activities of the alpha streptococci against the AOM pathogens has not been established [36]. In future studies it would also be beneficial to document levels of long-term persistence of each colonizing strain in the mixture.

 
 Streptococcal pharyngitis  
 

Acute S. pyogenes infections and their non-suppurative sequelae rheumatic fever and acute glomerulonephritis continue to exact their toll on susceptible populations, especially young school-aged children and those living under stressful and crowded conditions [37]. Reports of infection by 'flesh-eating' bacteria and the increase in cases of streptococcal toxic shock syndrome highlight the need for improved methods for combatting S. pyogenes. Unfortunately, the only effective strategy has been treatment of acute streptococcal infections as they become clinically apparent by administration of therapeutic doses of a broad-spectrum antibiotic such as penicillin. Because there is currently no anti-S. pyogenes immunization available the only means of protecting individuals at risk is antibiotic prophylaxis. These approaches have many inherent problems: the cost of antibiotics, the possibility of adverse host reactions, severe disruption of the indigenous microbiota and development of bacterial resistance. The significant issues of the S. pyogenes carrier state and of antibiotic treatment failures further compound the S. pyogenes problem.

Implementation of anti-S. pyogenes replacement therapy appears to offer an ecologically sound alternative to streptococcal control. Given that commensal streptococci are numerically predominant in the oral cavity, they are likely to be central in any naturally occurring anti-S. pyogenes activity. Several groups have investigated the S. pyogenes-interfering activities of the streptococcal residents of the oral microbiota. Throat cultures from children who develop S. pyogenes pharyngitis contain a lower proportion of bacteria that are inhibitory or bacteriocidal for S. pyogenes than cultures from children who do not become infected [38,39] . The pantothenic acid antagonist enocin, produced by some S. salivarius, was speculated to contribute to protection against S. pyogenes infections [40].

Of all bacterial species known to regularly inhabit the human oral microbiota in large numbers S. salivarius is perhaps the most innocuous. There are no reports of this species causing infections in the oral cavity and the rare instances of it's association with bacteremia or meningitis have occurred in immune-compromised patients or following trauma to the patients' tissues [41]. S. salivarius is common, not only on the dorsum of the tongue but also on the oropharyngeal mucosa [42], so it is well positioned to directly repel invasion by S. pyogenes. Approximately 45% of S. salivarius inhibit the growth of one or more members of a set of nine indicator strains used to detect streptococcal BLIS [43]. The pattern of inhibition of these indicators, when expressed in code form, is referred to as the BLIS production (P)-type [44]. In a longitudinal study of the distribution of hemolytic streptococci in schoolchildren it was observed that carriage or acquisition of S. pyogenes was not randomly distributed. Many of the rarely infected children were found to harbour large populations of S. salivarius producing anti-S. pyogenes BLIS activity [45]. This led to the hypothesis that the presence of certain BLIS-producing S. salivarius in the oral cavity could afford protection against S. pyogenes. A follow-up study of 780 Dunedin school children found two major types of BLIS activities produced by their S. salivarius, with the corresponding P-type patterns referred to as 226 (11% of children positive) and 677 (9% positive) [46]. A further 20% of the children had S. salivarius of various other P-type designations, including some isolates producing particularly strong (P-type 777) BLIS activity ( Fig. 3). The P-type 777 prototype strain K12 produces two lantibiotics, salivaricin A2 (a variant of salivaricin A [47]) and salivaricin B [48], each having strong anti-S. pyogenes inhibitory activity. Strain K12 has now been adopted by the New Zealand company BLIS Technologies Ltd (http://www.blis.co.nz) as the colonizing strain in a product, marketed as BLIS K12 Throat Guard ( Fig. 4), which aims to ''assist in maintaining a healthy throat''. The basic objective of colonisation with strain K12 is to provide a simple, inexpensive and relatively specific means of reducing the occurrence of streptococcal pharyngitis and perhaps also an alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of rheumatic fever recurrences. The potential for achieving reductions in morbidity and mortality associated with streptococcal pharyngitis and its complications, coupled with the savings in health care expenditure, provide compelling incentives for implementation of new strategies like this to reduce the numbers of acute streptococcal infections.
 
Fig. 3.
A deferred antagonism P-type test showing inhibition of all nine indicator bacteria effected by BLIS that had been previously deposited into the agar by a diametric streak culture of the producer strain.


 
Fig. 4.
BLIS K12 Throat Guard, the first commercially distributed preparation of S. salivarius.


 
 
 Benefits of replacement therapy  
 

A strong motivator for introduction of replacement therapy is the increased desire of consumers to use natural methods for health maintenance. Parenterally administered broad-spectrum antibiotics indiscriminately kill a wide variety of bacterial species associated with the host microflora, resulting in formation of an ecological vacuum and encouraging superinfection and resistance development. By contrast, BLIS-producing bacteria potentially offer a far more targeted solution to pathogen control. BLIS producers residing within the normal microflora are likely to cause little collateral killing of unrelated bacteria because they deliver narrow spectrum antimicrobial activity in concentrations that are probably inhibitory only to target bacteria in their immediate vicinity. Modulation of the microflora composition by specific introduction of strains of 'naturally occurring' species that are capable of excluding colonization and/or infection by target pathogens could be viewed as the controlled manipulation of a process that otherwise occurs haphazardly in nature. Directed implantation of relatively harmless effector bacteria known to be strongly competitive with potential pathogens offers a cost-effective, long-term means of achieving tailor-made protection for the host against specific bacterial infections. It might also foster increased herd protection through natural transmission of the effector strain to close contacts of the host. Furthermore, although consumer resistance might at present be an issue, genetic engineering ultimately presents a means of obtaining better-equipped effector strains, should equivalent natural isolates not be available.

 
 Difficulties and possible risks  
 

The normal microflora in healthy humans display remarkable quantitative and qualitative stability, a reflection of a finely tuned climax community of dynamically interacting microbes that limits invasion by any foreign microbe or overgrowth by a minority member of the population. However, the equilibrium is regularly upset by various events, most dramatically by exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics or antiseptics but also possibly following substantial nutritional, hormonal or physical changes to the micro-environment. Significant reductions in the numbers of individual components of the balanced microflora could result in overgrowth (superinfection) by previously suppressed minority members of the population. Similarly, the high intrinsic stability of the indigenous microbiota can present a major obstacle to modifying its composition by introduction of specific effector strains. Success is unlikely unless the effector strain is strongly competitive. Alternatively, the effector strain could be administered either before establishment of the microbial climax community (in the perinatal period) or upon creation of an appropriate niche following disruption of the microflora by exposure to antimicrobials.

Long term retention of antibiotic-producing effector strains might not be easily achieved. The additional energy and nutritional demands of antibiotic production could be sufficiently disadvantageous to organisms in some ecosystems that they will counterbalance any competitive benefit conferred by antibiosis. Under such circumstances the antibiotic-producing strain will gradually be replaced within the population.

The selection of pathogens resistant to the effector strain remains a problem, particularly if microbial interference is largely mediated by antibiosis. Typically, however, once an antibiotic selective pressure is removed resistant variants tend to be disadvantaged and are lost to the population. Also, the effector strain, no matter how harmless, could potentially initiate disease under unusual circumstances such as immunosuppression, immunodeficiency, burns, drugs, stress and climatic variation. Because not all risks can be predicted, new opportunistic infections could conceivably be initiated. However, it seems the risks of this occurring would be minimized by the application of naturally occurring strains commonly isolated from balanced ecosystems in normal individuals.

 
 Summary and future outlook  
 

Probiotics are widely accepted for replacement and recolonization of intestinal microflora and a variety of 'beneficial' strains are now inexpensively provided for the consumer in a range of milk-based formulations. By contrast, the development and application of bacterial replacement therapy for the prevention of childhood infectious diseases is not as advanced. Nevertheless, significant initiatives have been made in this field recently and the future appears to hold great promise for an increasingly prominent role for bacterial replacement therapy as an ecologically sound alternative to chemotherapy for the prevention and control of bacterial infections of the body surfaces of humans and other animals. More research is needed to identify (and possibly to modify) appropriate effector strains and to optimize the conditions (a) for their in vitro growth and preservation (b) for enhancing their colonization efficiency and (c) leading to their prolonged retention within the normal microflora.

 
 References  
 

[1] Pasteur L. and Joubert J.F. (1877) Charbon et septicémie.
C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 85:101-115.

[2] Florey H.W. (1946) The use of micro-organisms for therapeutic purposes.
Yale J. Biol. Med., 19:101-117. Cited by

[3] Brook I. (1999) Bacterial interference.
Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 25:155-172. ScienceDirect MEDLINE Cited by

[4] Alvarez-Olmos M.I. and Oberhelman R.A. (2001) Probiotic agents and infectious diseases: a modern perspective on a traditional therapy.
Clin. Infect. Dis., 32:1567-1576. MEDLINE Cited by

[5] Nase L. et al. (2001) Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children.
Caries Res., 35:412-420. MEDLINE Cited by

[6] Roos K. et al. (2001) Effect of recolonisation with ''interfering'' alpha streptococci on recurrences of acute and secretory otitis media in children: randomised placebo controlled trial.
B.M.J., 322:210-212.

[7] Hillman J.D. and Socransky S.S. (1987) Replacement therapy for the prevention of dental disease.
Adv. Dent. Res., 1:119-125. MEDLINE Cited by

[8] Reid G. (2001) Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital tract against infection.
Am J. Clin. Nutr., 73:437S-438S. Cited by

[9] Roos K. et al. (1996) Recolonization with selected alpha-streptococci for prophylaxis of recurrent streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis – a randomized placebo-controlled multicentre study.
Scand. J. Infect. Dis., 28:459-462. MEDLINE Cited by

[10] Tagg J.R.Prevention-still better than a cure. (1996) Microbiol Australia. Prevention-still better than a cure.

[11] Shinefield H.R. et al. (1971) Bacterial interference between strains of Staphylococcus aureus, 1960 to 1970.
Am. J. Dis. Child., 121:148-152. MEDLINE Cited by

[12] Bibel D.J. (1982) Bacterial interference, bacteriotherapy, and bacterioprophylaxis.
In: Aly R. and Shinefield H.R. (Eds) Bacterial interference. (pp. 1-12) : CRC Press Inc

[13] Aly R. et al. (1974) Bacterial interference among strains of Staphylococcus aureus in man.
J. Infect. Dis., 129:720-724. MEDLINE Cited by

[14] Kurasz A.B. et al. (1986) In vitro studies of growth and competition between S. salivarius TOVE-R and mutans streptococci.
J. Dent. Res., 65:1149-1153. MEDLINE Cited by

[15] James S.M. and Tagg J.R. (1988) A search within the genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus and Lactobacillus for organisms inhibitory to mutans streptococci.
Microb. Ecol. Health, 1:153-162.

[16] Jett B.D. and Gilmore M.S. (1990) The growth-inhibitory effect of the Enterococcus faecalis bacteriocin encoded by pAD1 extends to the oral streptococci.
J. Dent. Res., 69:1640-1645. MEDLINE Cited by

[17] Simmonds R.S. et al. (1997) Cloning and sequence analysis of zooA, a Streptococcus zooepidemicus gene encoding a bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance having a domain structure similar to that of lysostaphin.
Gene, 189:255-261. Full text MEDLINE Cited by

[18] Chikindas M.L. et al. (1997) Microbially-produced peptides having potential application to the prevention of dental caries.
Intl. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 9:95-105.

[19] Hillman J.D. et al. (2000) Construction and characterization of an effector strain of Streptococcus mutans for replacement therapy of dental caries.
Infect. Immun., 68:543-549. Full text MEDLINE Cited by

[20] Svanberg M.L. and Loesche W.J. (1978) Implantation of Streptococcus mutans on tooth surfaces in man.
Arch. Oral Biol., 23:551-556. MEDLINE Cited by

[21] Caufield P.W. et al. (1993) Initial acquisition of mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for a discrete window of infectivity.
J. Dent. Res., 72:37-45. MEDLINE Cited by

[22] Hillman J.D. et al. (1985) Colonization of the human oral cavity by a strain of Streptococcus mutans.
J. Dent. Res., 64:1272-1274. MEDLINE Cited by

[23] Hillman J.D. et al. (1984) Isolation of a Streptococcus mutans strain producing a novel bacteriocin.
Infect. Immun., 44:141-144. MEDLINE Cited by

[24] Hillman J.D. et al. (1987) Colonization of the human oral cavity by a Streptococcus mutans mutant producing increased bacteriocin.
J. Dent. Res., 66:1092-1094. MEDLINE Cited by

[25] Hillman J.D. et al. (1998) Genetic and biochemical analysis of mutacin 1140, a lantibiotic from Streptococcus mutans.
Infect. Immun., 66:2743-2749. Full text MEDLINE Cited by

[26] Smith L. et al. (2000) Covalent structure of mutacin 1140 and a novel method for the rapid identification of lantibiotics.
Eur. J. Biochem., 267:6810-6816. MEDLINE Cited by

[27] Hillman J.D. (2002) Genetically modified Streptococcus mutans for the prevention of dental caries.
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 82:361-366. MEDLINE Cited by

[28] Tanzer J.M. et al. (1974) Diminished virulence of glucan synthesis-defective mutants of Streptococcus mutans.
Infect. Immun., 10:197-203. MEDLINE Cited by

[29] Johnson C.P. et al. (1980) Cariogenic potential in vitro in man and in vivo in the rat of lactate dehydrogenase mutants of Streptococcus mutans.
Arch. Oral Biol., 25:707-713. MEDLINE Cited by

[30] Faden H. et al. (1997) Relationship between nasopharyngeal colonization and the development of otitis media in children.
J. Infect. Dis., 175:1440-1445. MEDLINE Cited by

[31] Bernstein J.M. et al. (1993) Micro-ecology of the nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in otitis-prone and non-otitis-prone children.
Acta Otolaryngol., 113:88-92.

[32] Brook I. and Yocum P. (1999) Bacterial interference in the adenoids of otitis media-prone children.
Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 18:835-837. MEDLINE Cited by

[33] Fujimori I. et al. (1996) The nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in children with otitis media with effusion.
Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 253:260-263. MEDLINE Cited by

[34] Tano K. et al. (1999) In vitro inhibition of S. pneumoniae, nontypable H. influenzae and M. catharralis by alpha-hemolytic streptococci from healthy children.
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., 47:49-56. ScienceDirect MEDLINE Cited by

[35] Tano K. et al. (2002) A nasal spray with alpha-haemolytic streptococci as long term prophylaxis against recurrent otitis media.
Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol., 62:17-23. ScienceDirect MEDLINE Cited by

[36] Tano K. et al. (2002) Bacterial interference between pathogens in otitis media and alpha-haemolytic streptococci analysed in an in vitro model.
Acta Otolaryngol., 122:78-85.

[37] Stollerman G.H. (2001) Rheumatic Fever in the 21st Century.
Clin. Infect. Dis., 33:806-814. MEDLINE Cited by

[38] Grahn E. and Holm S.E. (1983) Bacterial interference in the throat flora during a streptococcal outbreak in an apartment house area.
Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. A, 256:72-79.

[39] Sanders E. (1969) Bacterial interference: Its occurrence among the respiratory tract flora and characterisation of inhibition of group A streptococci by viridans streptococci.
J. Infect. Dis., 120:698-707. MEDLINE Cited by

[40] Sanders C.C. and Sanders W.E. (1982) Enocin: An antibiotic produced by Streptococcus salivarius that may contribute to protection against infections due to Group A streptococci.
J. Infect. Dis., 146:683-690. MEDLINE Cited by

[41] Carley N.H. (1992) Streptococcus salivarius bacteremia and meningitis following upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and cauterization for gastric bleeding.
Clin. Infect. Dis., 14:947-948. MEDLINE Cited by

[42] Frandsen E.V. et al. (1991) Ecology of viridans streptococci in the oral cavity and pharynx.
Oral Microbiol. Immunol., 6:129-133. MEDLINE Cited by

[43] Dempster R.P. and Tagg J.R. (1982) The production of bacteriocin-like substances by the oral bacterium Streptococcus salivarius.
Arch. Oral Biol., 27:151-157. MEDLINE Cited by

[44] Tagg J.R. and Bannister L.V. (1979) ''Fingerprinting'' ß-haemolytic streptococci by their production of and sensitivity to bacteriocine-like inhibitors.
J. Med. Microbiol., 12:397-411. MEDLINE Cited by

[45] Tagg J.R. et al. (1990) A longitudinal study of Lancefield group A streptococcus acquisitions by a group of young Dunedin schoolchildren.
New Zealand Med. J., 103:429-431. MEDLINE Cited by

[46] Dierksen K.P. and Tagg J.R. (1999) Influence of indigenous bacteriocin-producing Streptococcus salivarius on the acquisition of Streptococcus pyogenes by primary school children in Dunedin, New Zealand.
In: Martin D.R. and Tagg J.R. (Eds) Proceedings of the XIV Lancefield Internation Symposium on Streptococci and Streptococcal Diseases. (pp. 81-85)

[47] Ross K.F. et al. (1993) Isolation and characterization of the lantibiotic salivaricin A and its structural gene salA from Streptococcus salivarius 20P3.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59:2014-2021. MEDLINE Cited by

[48] Tagg, J.R. et al. (2001) Lantibiotic. International patent WO 01/27143 A1 dated 19 April 2001.

[49] Simmonds R.S. et al. (1995) The streptococcal bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance, zoocin A, reduces the proportion of Streptococcus mutans in an artificial plaque.
Micobial. Ecol. Health Dis., 8:281-292.

 
 Copyright  
 

© 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.