[1]
Department of Microbiology, University
of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New
Zealand[2]
Department of Bioengineering, Oregon
State University, Gilmore 122,
Corvallis, Oregon, 97331, USA
The individual bacterial members of our indigeneous microbiota are
actively engaged in an on-going battle to
prevent colonisation and overgrowth of their
terrain by competing microbes, some of which
might have pathogenic potential for the
host. Humans have long attempted to
intervene in these bacterial interactions.
Ingestion of probiotic bacteria,
particularly lactobacilli, is commonly
practiced to promote well-balanced
intestinal microflora. As bacterial
resistance to antimicrobials has increased,
so too has research into colonisation of
human tissues with specific effector strains
capable of out-competing known bacterial
pathogens. Recent progress is particularly
evident in the application of avirulent
Streptococcus mutans to the control of
dental caries, alpha hemolytic streptococci
to reduction of otitis media recurrences and
Streptococcus salivarius to
streptococcal pharyngitis prevention.
Documentation showing that relatively
harmless microorganisms could be introduced
into the indigenous microbiota of humans
either to enhance resistance to or to treat
infection dates from the very origins of
microbiology. In 1877, Pasteur and his
associate Joubert, noting suppression of
anthrax bacillus growth in co-cultures with
'common bacilli' (probably Escherichia
coli), commented that ''these facts
perhaps justify the highest hopes for
therapeutics'' [1]. In
the early years of the next century, there
followed a series of brave attempts by
physicians to afford protection against
diseases such as tuberculosis, anthrax and
diphtheria by dosing patients with
putatively innocuous commensal bacteria
[2]. However, except for
the treatment of minor ailments or as
supplemental therapy, the application of
so-called 'bacteriotherapy' or
'bacterioprophylaxis' was largely
discontinued on the spectacular advent of
antibiotics. For a time it seems that both
physicians and the public became rather
complacent about our potential bacterial
adversaries; therapeutic antibiotics were
perceived to be omnipotent the panaceas
for all bacterial ills. Within the span of a
single human generation many bacterial
species adapted to their antibiotic-laced
ecosystems and variants flourished that are
capable of resisting our most potent
designer antimicrobials. The medical
community must now face the reality that
most chemotherapeutic agents are probably
destined for a relatively short half-life of
effectiveness. This dilemma might
increasingly encourage us to reconsider the
Pasteur approach that bacteria themselves
could be our most effective allies as we
continue to confront the relatively small
but resilient band of miscreant microbes
capable of causing infections in man and
other animals [3].
Ever since probiotics were made prominent by
the flamboyant Eli Metchinikoff, the
practice of regular ingestion of intestinal
commensals (especially lactobacilli) to
confer health-promoting benefits has been
commonly used by humans and for various
farmed animals [4]. One
beneficial side-effect of long-term
ingestion of probiotic lactobacilli reported
recently is an apparent reduction in dental
caries [5]. In general,
however, probiotic principles have not been
widely applied to the specific protection of
other body surfaces against bacterial
infection. Several small groups of dedicated
adherents to the principles of replacement
therapy have, however, initiated pilot
studies aimed at protecting the human host
against development of otitis media
[6], dental caries
[7] and urogenital tract
infections [8] or
against infection by Streptococcus
pyogenes[9,10] and
Staphylococcus aureus[11]. Although the
outcomes have been reported to be promising,
none of these studies has resulted in
widespread acceptance and routine
application of replacement therapy
principles as a preventative regimen. One
mitigating factor might be the ethical
consideration that even reputedly
low-virulence colonising strains might
sometimes cause infections in
immune-compromised individuals. Undaunted
however, some of these groups have continued
to explore the application of 'friendly
bacteria' to infection control and it
appears that momentum is now gathering,
particularly for the control of three of the
most common bacterial infections of
childhood: dental caries, otitis media and
streptococcal pharyngitis (
Table 1).
Table 1.
Bacteria tested as potential
'effectors' for replacement therapy
The accessible surfaces of the skin, oral
cavity, upper respiratory tract,
gastrointestinal tract and vagina of healthy
vertebrates are colonized by microbes soon
after birth. What generally follows is an
orderly, site-specific succession of
microbial acquisitions and eliminations as
the populations of indigenous microbes
evolve to form climax communities highly
stable menageries of microbes perfectly
adapted to life in each particular
ecosystem. Collectively known as the normal
microflora or indigenous microbiota, these
microbes are the body's first line of
defense our personal army of protectors
with a keen interest in our well-being
because our healthy tissues constitute their
preferred homeland.
The basis of replacement therapy is the
implantation and persistence within the
normal microflora of relatively innocuous
'effector' bacteria that can competitively
exclude or prevent the outgrowth of
potentially disease-causing bacteria,
without significantly disturbing the balance
of the existing microbial ecosystem
[12] (
Box 1).
Sometimes the mechanisms operating in
situ to confer host protection in
documented instances of replacement therapy
or microbial interference are not known, as
exemplified by the relatively harmless S.
aureus strain 502A [13]
and the rough colony variant strain of
Streptococcus salivarius known as TOVE-R
( Fig. 1), which has
anti-Streptococcus mutans action
in vivo[14].
Nevertheless, it is generally considered
that mechanisms contributing to microbial
interference might typically include either
the greater ability of the effector
bacterium to adhere to surfaces and to
compete with others for limited space and
key nutrients or the superior capability of
that bacterium to produce and be resistant
to a variety of anti-competitor molecules,
some relatively non-specific in their
targeting (e.g. acids, hydrogen peroxide)
and others (e.g. bacteriocins,
bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances
(BLIS) and bacteriophages) apparently
principally targeted against relatively
similar bacteria ( Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
A mitis-salivarius agar culture of
S. salivarius strain TOVE showing
both smooth and rough colony forms.
Modified from [10].
Fig. 2.
Simultaneous antagonism test
demonstrating several bacteriocin-like
inhibitory substance (BLIS)-producing
bacteria inhibiting the growth of a
lawn culture of Micrococcus luteus.
Dental
caries
On the basis of several decades of
epidemiological observations and
laboratory-based research, S. mutans,
and to a lesser extent Streptococcus
sobrinus, are now generally considered
the principal etiological agents of dental
caries in humans. Two attributes of these
so-called mutans streptococci (MS) that are
particularly relevant to their involvement
in caries are their production of large
quantities of acid from dietary carbohydrate
and their formation from sucrose of
highly-branched extracellular
polysaccharides (glucans) that help trap
acidic metabolites within the plaque matrix.
According to the acidogenic theory of dental
caries the products of bacterial
fermentation, particularly lactic acid,
mediate the development of caries reducing
the pH of the microenvironment of the tooth
surface below the critical threshold at
which dissolution of the mineral phase of
enamel and dentine is initiated. The
weakened surface eventually cavitates to
form a clinically evident lesion.
Attempts to devise a microbial
interference-based strategy to prevent
dental caries first focused on identifying
relatively non-pathogenic oral commensals
capable of inhibiting growth of the majority
of MS [15].
Unfortunately, with the notable exception of
certain enterococci [16],
S. salivarius[14]
and Streptococcus equi subspecies
zooepidemicus[17],
the strongest producers of anti-MS activity
appear to be other strains of MS
[18].
Most progress in this field has been made by
Jeffrey Hillman's group
[19]. The rationale behind their studies
is that relatively avirulent strains of MS
are most likely to occupy the same
ecological niche in plaque as their more
cariogenic counterparts. Previous studies
demonstrated that it is difficult to achieve
persistent colonization of plaque with
laboratory strains of MS, particularly in
subjects already harbouring indigenous MS
[20]. Indeed horizontal
transfer of MS, even between close contacts,
is a rare event other than for a period of
several months following the onset of tooth
eruption when children tend to acquire MS
strains from their primary caregiver
[21]. This 'window of
infectivity' period is the preferred time to
attempt implantation of MS effector strains
[7]. Hillman's concept,
however, was that the tooth surface might be
more readily colonized by a naturally
occurring or genetically engineered MS
effector strain that was not only relatively
avirulent (i.e. weakly cariogenic) but also
highly competitive, owing to its production
of anti-MS BLIS activity. The strains
selected for further development as the
effector for MS replacement therapy were
S. mutans JH1000 and its
tetracycline-resistant mutant JH1001
[22]. Strain JH1000
produced potent BLIS activity in vitro
that was inhibitory to a wide variety of
Gram-positive species, including all but one
of 125 tested MS [23].
Several mutants (eg. JH1005 and JH1140) of
this strain producing increased levels of
BLIS were used in human subjects to
demonstrate that colonization efficacy and
persistence correlated directly with the
level of BLIS production
[24]. The epidermin-like lantibiotic
mutacin 1140 has now been isolated from
strain JH1140 [25] and
its primary structure elucidated
[26].
Strain JH1001 and its derivatives have
strong colonization properties in humans.
For example, strain JH1005 was apparently
retained for 14 years in some subjects
following a single application, and moreover
appeared to competitively exclude
colonization with all other S. mutans
strains [27]. The major
problem with the use of strain JH1001 and
its BLIS-enhanced derivatives in replacement
therapy is that these strains, being highly
acidogenic MS, are themselves potentially
cariogenic.
Parallel studies by the same group explored
techniques for reducing the cariogenicity of
potential effector strains. Although mutants
exhibiting defects in glucan synthesis have
reduced cariogenicity in animal models, they
are unlikely to compete successfully with
glucan-synthesizing strains for prime plaque
locations [28]. Thus,
attention was focused on the introduction of
mutations affecting acid production
[19]. Although lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH) mutants of the MS
species Streptococcus rattus produced
less lactic acid and had reduced
cariogenicity in rodent models
[29], this type of
mutation was lethal in S. mutans.
However, insertion of a Zygomonas mobilis
gene encoding alcohol dehydrogenase helped
overcome the LDH deficiency. The
construction of the proposed replacement
therapy strain BCS3-L1 involved insertion of
the Z. mobilis gene into strain
JH1140, followed by deletion of virtually
all of the LDH gene [19].
This produced a strain that combined the
traits of low acid production and strong
mutacin production. Colonization trials in
rats indicated that strain BCS3-L1 performed
at least as well as strain JH1140
indicating that it could also be effective
in humans.
Issues still to be addressed:
Strain BCS3-L1 forms more plaque
when grown in vitro in the
presence of sucrose than strain JH1140
does, probably reflecting a pH-related
effect on glucosyl transferase
activity [19].
However, small increases in glucan
formation in situ are not
anticipated to result in significantly
more plaque formation or
plaque-associated disease (e.g.
gingivitis).
Although reversion to LDH
production (resulting in a strongly
competitive cariogenic strain)
following natural transformation of
the effector strain is considered
unlikely, it nevertheless constitutes
a potential objection to implantation
of LDH mutants. Further engineering of
strain BSC3-L1 (deletion of comE)
is currently being undertaken to
cripple its transformation capability
[27].
The toxicity of mutacin 1140 has
not yet been directly tested but the
molecule is broadly similar to the
lantibiotic nisin, which has been
widely used as a food preservative for
decades. Furthermore, no
treatment-related lesions have been
detected in the organs of rats
colonized with mutacin 1140 producers
[19].
The potent mutacin output and
different fermentation profile of
strain BCS3-L1 could upset plaque
ecology and result in the
proliferation of organisms with
pathogenic potential. Interestingly,
however, the initial colonization
studies with mutacin 1140-producing
strains indicated apparent high
specific inhibitory activity of the
mutacin in situ. Exclusion of
other MS was reported, with little or
no other detectable modification to
the total composition and balance of
the subjects' plaque microbiota
[24]. This high
specificity contrasts dramatically
with the broad activity spectrum of
mutacin 1140 when tested in vitro[23]. These
findings indicate that BLIS-producing
bacteria do not necessarily eliminate
all sensitive co-inhabitants in
complex ecosystems, such as dental
plaque. Presumably the distinct
micro-habitats found within complex
biofilms, and the differing
physiological growth states of the
inhabitants enable the individual
members of heterogeneous populations
to co-exist, despite incompatibilities
they might display in more homogeneous
environments such as laboratory
cultures.
Otitis
media
Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common
bacterial infection in young children (peak
age 12 years), with Streptococcus
pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae
and less often Moraxella catarrhalis
and S. pyogenes commonly implicated.
The causative bacteria typically translocate
from the nasopharynx to the middle ear via
the eustachian tube [30].
Many children seem predisposed to recurrent
otitis media and the principal strategies to
provide protection against repeat infections
are antibiotic prophylaxis and fitting of
tympanostomy tubes. However, the increasing
numbers of antibiotic resistant pathogens
raises questions about net benefits of
antibiotic prophylaxis. Moreover, such
prophylaxis will inevitably affect the
balance of normal nasopharyngeal microflora,
facilitating colonization with pathogens.
Placement of tympanostomy tubes can be
effective but is expensive and involves the
recognized risks of general anaesthesia and
surgery [6].
Several studies have reported higher numbers
of alpha streptococci in the nasopharynx of
healthy children when compared with children
who are prone to AOM
[3133] . In addition, the alpha
streptococci from the openings of eustachian
tubes appeared more likely to have
interfering activity against AOM pathogens
than those isolated from the adenoid tissue
[34]. Subsequently, a
nasal spray containing five alpha
streptococci (two Streptococcus sanguinis,
two Streptococcus mitis and one
Streptococcus oralis) showing in
vitro inhibitory activity against AOM
pathogens when tested in a double-blind,
randomised, placebo-controlled study
significantly reduced the recurrence rate of
AOM and frequency of secretory otitis media
[6]. Significantly, the
children enrolled in this study were given
antibiotic for 10 days before use of either
the streptococcal or placebo spray.
In a similar study with no prior use of
antibiotics, there was no significant
decrease in the levels of AOM pathogens or
protection against repeat episodes of AOM
afforded children treated with the alpha
streptococcal spray [35].
This highlights the problems involved in
modifying the normal microflora of the
nasopharynx in the absence of antibiotic
intervention. To date, the nature of the
interfering activities of the alpha
streptococci against the AOM pathogens has
not been established [36].
In future studies it would also be
beneficial to document levels of long-term
persistence of each colonizing strain in the
mixture.
Streptococcal
pharyngitis
Acute S. pyogenes infections and
their non-suppurative sequelae rheumatic
fever and acute glomerulonephritis continue
to exact their toll on susceptible
populations, especially young school-aged
children and those living under stressful
and crowded conditions [37].
Reports of infection by 'flesh-eating'
bacteria and the increase in cases of
streptococcal toxic shock syndrome highlight
the need for improved methods for combatting
S. pyogenes. Unfortunately, the only
effective strategy has been treatment of
acute streptococcal infections as they
become clinically apparent by administration
of therapeutic doses of a broad-spectrum
antibiotic such as penicillin. Because there
is currently no anti-S. pyogenes
immunization available the only means of
protecting individuals at risk is antibiotic
prophylaxis. These approaches have many
inherent problems: the cost of antibiotics,
the possibility of adverse host reactions,
severe disruption of the indigenous
microbiota and development of bacterial
resistance. The significant issues of the
S. pyogenes carrier state and of
antibiotic treatment failures further
compound the S. pyogenes problem.
Implementation of anti-S. pyogenes
replacement therapy appears to offer an
ecologically sound alternative to
streptococcal control. Given that commensal
streptococci are numerically predominant in
the oral cavity, they are likely to be
central in any naturally occurring anti-S.
pyogenes activity. Several groups have
investigated the S. pyogenes-interfering
activities of the streptococcal residents of
the oral microbiota. Throat cultures from
children who develop S. pyogenes
pharyngitis contain a lower proportion of
bacteria that are inhibitory or
bacteriocidal for S. pyogenes than
cultures from children who do not become
infected [38,39] . The
pantothenic acid antagonist enocin, produced
by some S. salivarius, was speculated
to contribute to protection against S.
pyogenes infections
[40].
Of all bacterial species known to regularly
inhabit the human oral microbiota in large
numbers S. salivarius is perhaps the
most innocuous. There are no reports of this
species causing infections in the oral
cavity and the rare instances of it's
association with bacteremia or meningitis
have occurred in immune-compromised patients
or following trauma to the patients' tissues
[41]. S. salivarius
is common, not only on the dorsum of the
tongue but also on the oropharyngeal mucosa
[42], so it is well
positioned to directly repel invasion by
S. pyogenes. Approximately 45% of S.
salivarius inhibit the growth of one or
more members of a set of nine indicator
strains used to detect streptococcal BLIS
[43]. The pattern of
inhibition of these indicators, when
expressed in code form, is referred to as
the BLIS production (P)-type
[44]. In a longitudinal
study of the distribution of hemolytic
streptococci in schoolchildren it was
observed that carriage or acquisition of
S. pyogenes was not randomly
distributed. Many of the rarely infected
children were found to harbour large
populations of S. salivarius
producing anti-S. pyogenes BLIS
activity [45]. This led
to the hypothesis that the presence of
certain BLIS-producing S. salivarius
in the oral cavity could afford protection
against S. pyogenes. A follow-up
study of 780 Dunedin school children found
two major types of BLIS activities produced
by their S. salivarius, with the
corresponding P-type patterns referred to as
226 (11% of children positive) and 677 (9%
positive) [46]. A
further 20% of the children had S.
salivarius of various other P-type
designations, including some isolates
producing particularly strong (P-type 777)
BLIS activity ( Fig. 3).
The P-type 777 prototype strain K12 produces
two lantibiotics, salivaricin A2 (a variant
of salivaricin A [47])
and salivaricin B [48],
each having strong anti-S. pyogenes
inhibitory activity. Strain K12 has now been
adopted by the New Zealand company BLIS
Technologies Ltd (http://www.blis.co.nz)
as the colonizing strain in a product,
marketed as BLIS K12 Throat Guard (
Fig. 4), which aims to
''assist in maintaining a healthy throat''.
The basic objective of colonisation with
strain K12 is to provide a simple,
inexpensive and relatively specific means of
reducing the occurrence of streptococcal
pharyngitis and perhaps also an alternative
to antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention
of rheumatic fever recurrences. The
potential for achieving reductions in
morbidity and mortality associated with
streptococcal pharyngitis and its
complications, coupled with the savings in
health care expenditure, provide compelling
incentives for implementation of new
strategies like this to reduce the numbers
of acute streptococcal infections.
Fig. 3.
A deferred antagonism P-type test
showing inhibition of all nine
indicator bacteria effected by BLIS
that had been previously deposited
into the agar by a diametric streak
culture of the producer strain.
Fig. 4.
BLIS K12 Throat Guard, the first
commercially distributed preparation
of S. salivarius.
Benefits
of replacement therapy
A strong motivator for introduction of
replacement therapy is the increased desire
of consumers to use natural methods for
health maintenance. Parenterally
administered broad-spectrum antibiotics
indiscriminately kill a wide variety of
bacterial species associated with the host
microflora, resulting in formation of an
ecological vacuum and encouraging
superinfection and resistance development.
By contrast, BLIS-producing bacteria
potentially offer a far more targeted
solution to pathogen control. BLIS producers
residing within the normal microflora are
likely to cause little collateral killing of
unrelated bacteria because they deliver
narrow spectrum antimicrobial activity in
concentrations that are probably inhibitory
only to target bacteria in their immediate
vicinity. Modulation of the microflora
composition by specific introduction of
strains of 'naturally occurring' species
that are capable of excluding colonization
and/or infection by target pathogens could
be viewed as the controlled manipulation of
a process that otherwise occurs haphazardly
in nature. Directed implantation of
relatively harmless effector bacteria known
to be strongly competitive with potential
pathogens offers a cost-effective, long-term
means of achieving tailor-made protection
for the host against specific bacterial
infections. It might also foster increased
herd protection through natural transmission
of the effector strain to close contacts of
the host. Furthermore, although consumer
resistance might at present be an issue,
genetic engineering ultimately presents a
means of obtaining better-equipped effector
strains, should equivalent natural isolates
not be available.
Difficulties
and possible risks
The normal microflora in healthy humans
display remarkable quantitative and
qualitative stability, a reflection of a
finely tuned climax community of dynamically
interacting microbes that limits invasion by
any foreign microbe or overgrowth by a
minority member of the population. However,
the equilibrium is regularly upset by
various events, most dramatically by
exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics or
antiseptics but also possibly following
substantial nutritional, hormonal or
physical changes to the micro-environment.
Significant reductions in the numbers of
individual components of the balanced
microflora could result in overgrowth
(superinfection) by previously suppressed
minority members of the population.
Similarly, the high intrinsic stability of
the indigenous microbiota can present a
major obstacle to modifying its composition
by introduction of specific effector
strains. Success is unlikely unless the
effector strain is strongly competitive.
Alternatively, the effector strain could be
administered either before establishment of
the microbial climax community (in the
perinatal period) or upon creation of an
appropriate niche following disruption of
the microflora by exposure to
antimicrobials.
Long term retention of antibiotic-producing
effector strains might not be easily
achieved. The additional energy and
nutritional demands of antibiotic production
could be sufficiently disadvantageous to
organisms in some ecosystems that they will
counterbalance any competitive benefit
conferred by antibiosis. Under such
circumstances the antibiotic-producing
strain will gradually be replaced within the
population.
The selection of pathogens resistant to the
effector strain remains a problem,
particularly if microbial interference is
largely mediated by antibiosis. Typically,
however, once an antibiotic selective
pressure is removed resistant variants tend
to be disadvantaged and are lost to the
population. Also, the effector strain, no
matter how harmless, could potentially
initiate disease under unusual circumstances
such as immunosuppression, immunodeficiency,
burns, drugs, stress and climatic variation.
Because not all risks can be predicted, new
opportunistic infections could conceivably
be initiated. However, it seems the risks of
this occurring would be minimized by the
application of naturally occurring strains
commonly isolated from balanced ecosystems
in normal individuals.
Summary
and future outlook
Probiotics are widely accepted for
replacement and recolonization of intestinal
microflora and a variety of 'beneficial'
strains are now inexpensively provided for
the consumer in a range of milk-based
formulations. By contrast, the development
and application of bacterial replacement
therapy for the prevention of childhood
infectious diseases is not as advanced.
Nevertheless, significant initiatives have
been made in this field recently and the
future appears to hold great promise for an
increasingly prominent role for bacterial
replacement therapy as an ecologically sound
alternative to chemotherapy for the
prevention and control of bacterial
infections of the body surfaces of humans
and other animals. More research is needed
to identify (and possibly to modify)
appropriate effector strains and to optimize
the conditions (a) for their in vitro
growth and preservation (b) for enhancing
their colonization efficiency and (c)
leading to their prolonged retention within
the normal microflora.
References
[1] Pasteur L. and
Joubert J.F. (1877) Charbon et
septicémie. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 85:101-115.
[2] Florey H.W. (1946)
The use of micro-organisms for
therapeutic purposes. Yale J. Biol. Med., 19:101-117.
Cited by
[4] Alvarez-Olmos M.I.
and Oberhelman R.A. (2001) Probiotic
agents and infectious diseases: a modern
perspective on a traditional therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis., 32:1567-1576.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[5] Nase L. et al.
(2001) Effect of long-term consumption of
a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus
rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries
and caries risk in children. Caries Res., 35:412-420.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[6] Roos K. et al.
(2001) Effect of recolonisation with
''interfering'' alpha streptococci on
recurrences of acute and secretory otitis
media in children: randomised placebo
controlled trial. B.M.J., 322:210-212.
[7] Hillman J.D. and
Socransky S.S. (1987) Replacement therapy
for the prevention of dental disease. Adv. Dent. Res., 1:119-125.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[8] Reid G. (2001)
Probiotic agents to protect the urogenital
tract against infection. Am J. Clin. Nutr., 73:437S-438S.
Cited by
[9] Roos K. et al.
(1996) Recolonization with selected
alpha-streptococci for prophylaxis of
recurrent streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis
a randomized placebo-controlled
multicentre study. Scand. J. Infect. Dis., 28:459-462.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[10] Tagg J.R.Prevention-still
better than a cure. (1996) Microbiol
Australia.Prevention-still better
than a cure.
[11] Shinefield H.R.
et al. (1971) Bacterial
interference between strains of
Staphylococcus aureus, 1960 to 1970. Am. J. Dis. Child., 121:148-152.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[12] Bibel D.J.
(1982) Bacterial interference,
bacteriotherapy, and bacterioprophylaxis.
In: Aly R. and Shinefield H.R. (Eds)
Bacterial interference. (pp. 1-12) : CRC
Press Inc
[13] Aly R. et al.
(1974) Bacterial interference among
strains of Staphylococcus aureus in
man. J. Infect. Dis., 129:720-724.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[14] Kurasz A.B.
et al. (1986) In vitro studies
of growth and competition between S.
salivarius TOVE-R and mutans
streptococci. J. Dent. Res., 65:1149-1153.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[15] James S.M. and
Tagg J.R. (1988) A search within the
genera Streptococcus, Enterococcus
and Lactobacillus for organisms
inhibitory to mutans streptococci. Microb. Ecol. Health, 1:153-162.
[16] Jett B.D. and
Gilmore M.S. (1990) The growth-inhibitory
effect of the Enterococcus faecalis
bacteriocin encoded by pAD1 extends to the
oral streptococci. J. Dent. Res., 69:1640-1645.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[17] Simmonds R.S.
et al. (1997) Cloning and sequence
analysis of zooA, a Streptococcus
zooepidemicus gene encoding a
bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance having
a domain structure similar to that of
lysostaphin. Gene, 189:255-261.
Full text
MEDLINE
Cited by
[18] Chikindas M.L.
et al. (1997) Microbially-produced
peptides having potential application to the
prevention of dental caries. Intl. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 9:95-105.
[19] Hillman J.D.
et al. (2000) Construction and
characterization of an effector strain of
Streptococcus mutans for replacement
therapy of dental caries. Infect. Immun., 68:543-549.
Full text
MEDLINE
Cited by
[20] Svanberg M.L.
and Loesche W.J. (1978) Implantation of
Streptococcus mutans on tooth
surfaces in man. Arch. Oral Biol., 23:551-556.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[21] Caufield P.W.
et al. (1993) Initial acquisition of
mutans streptococci by infants: evidence for
a discrete window of infectivity. J. Dent. Res., 72:37-45.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[22] Hillman J.D.
et al. (1985) Colonization of the
human oral cavity by a strain of
Streptococcus mutans. J. Dent. Res., 64:1272-1274.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[23] Hillman J.D.
et al. (1984) Isolation of a
Streptococcus mutans strain producing a
novel bacteriocin. Infect. Immun., 44:141-144.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[24] Hillman J.D.
et al. (1987) Colonization of the
human oral cavity by a Streptococcus
mutans mutant producing increased
bacteriocin. J. Dent. Res., 66:1092-1094.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[25] Hillman J.D.
et al. (1998) Genetic and biochemical
analysis of mutacin 1140, a lantibiotic from
Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun., 66:2743-2749.
Full text
MEDLINE
Cited by
[26] Smith L. et
al. (2000) Covalent structure of
mutacin 1140 and a novel method for the
rapid identification of lantibiotics. Eur. J. Biochem., 267:6810-6816.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[27] Hillman J.D.
(2002) Genetically modified
Streptococcus mutans for the prevention
of dental caries. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 82:361-366.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[28] Tanzer J.M.
et al. (1974) Diminished virulence of
glucan synthesis-defective mutants of
Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun., 10:197-203.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[29] Johnson C.P.
et al. (1980) Cariogenic potential in
vitro in man and in vivo in the rat of
lactate dehydrogenase mutants of
Streptococcus mutans. Arch. Oral Biol., 25:707-713.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[30] Faden H. et
al. (1997) Relationship between
nasopharyngeal colonization and the
development of otitis media in children. J. Infect. Dis., 175:1440-1445.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[31] Bernstein J.M.
et al. (1993) Micro-ecology of the
nasopharyngeal bacterial flora in
otitis-prone and non-otitis-prone children. Acta Otolaryngol., 113:88-92.
[32] Brook I. and
Yocum P. (1999) Bacterial interference in
the adenoids of otitis media-prone children. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 18:835-837.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[33] Fujimori I.
et al. (1996) The nasopharyngeal
bacterial flora in children with otitis
media with effusion. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol., 253:260-263.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[34] Tano K. et
al. (1999) In vitro inhibition
of S. pneumoniae, nontypable H.
influenzae and M. catharralis by
alpha-hemolytic streptococci from healthy
children. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.,
47:49-56.
ScienceDirect
MEDLINE
Cited by
[35] Tano K. et
al. (2002) A nasal spray with
alpha-haemolytic streptococci as long term
prophylaxis against recurrent otitis media. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.,
62:17-23.
ScienceDirect
MEDLINE
Cited by
[36] Tano K. et
al. (2002) Bacterial interference
between pathogens in otitis media and
alpha-haemolytic streptococci analysed in an
in vitro model. Acta Otolaryngol., 122:78-85.
[37] Stollerman G.H.
(2001) Rheumatic Fever in the 21st
Century. Clin. Infect. Dis., 33:806-814.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[38] Grahn E. and
Holm S.E. (1983) Bacterial interference
in the throat flora during a streptococcal
outbreak in an apartment house area. Zbl. Bakt. Hyg. A, 256:72-79.
[39] Sanders E.
(1969) Bacterial interference: Its
occurrence among the respiratory tract flora
and characterisation of inhibition of group
A streptococci by viridans streptococci. J. Infect. Dis., 120:698-707.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[40] Sanders C.C. and
Sanders W.E. (1982) Enocin: An antibiotic
produced by Streptococcus salivarius
that may contribute to protection against
infections due to Group A streptococci. J. Infect. Dis., 146:683-690.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[41] Carley N.H.
(1992) Streptococcus salivarius
bacteremia and meningitis following upper
gastrointestinal endoscopy and cauterization
for gastric bleeding. Clin. Infect. Dis., 14:947-948.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[42] Frandsen E.V.
et al. (1991) Ecology of viridans
streptococci in the oral cavity and pharynx. Oral Microbiol. Immunol., 6:129-133.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[43] Dempster R.P.
and Tagg J.R. (1982) The production of
bacteriocin-like substances by the oral
bacterium Streptococcus salivarius. Arch. Oral Biol., 27:151-157.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[44] Tagg J.R. and
Bannister L.V. (1979) ''Fingerprinting''
ß-haemolytic streptococci by their
production of and sensitivity to
bacteriocine-like inhibitors. J. Med. Microbiol., 12:397-411.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[45] Tagg J.R. et
al. (1990) A longitudinal study of
Lancefield group A streptococcus
acquisitions by a group of young Dunedin
schoolchildren. New Zealand Med. J., 103:429-431.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[46] Dierksen K.P.
and Tagg J.R. (1999) Influence of
indigenous bacteriocin-producing
Streptococcus salivarius on the
acquisition of Streptococcus pyogenes
by primary school children in Dunedin, New
Zealand.
In: Martin D.R. and Tagg J.R. (Eds)
Proceedings of the XIV Lancefield
Internation Symposium on Streptococci and
Streptococcal Diseases. (pp. 81-85)
[47] Ross K.F. et
al. (1993) Isolation and
characterization of the lantibiotic
salivaricin A and its structural gene salA
from Streptococcus salivarius 20P3. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 59:2014-2021.
MEDLINE
Cited by
[48] Tagg, J.R. et
al. (2001) Lantibiotic. International
patent WO 01/27143 A1 dated 19 April 2001.
[49] Simmonds R.S.
et al. (1995) The streptococcal
bacteriocin-like inhibitory substance,
zoocin A, reduces the proportion of
Streptococcus mutans in an artificial
plaque. Micobial. Ecol. Health Dis., 8:281-292.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"