Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/links/doi/10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01048.x/abs/

Abstract
 
Download to reference manager

Tropical Medicine & International Health

Volume 8 Issue 5 Page 386  - May 2003

 
Polio eradication - the validity of surveillance indicators
Bernice N Harris1, David N Dürrheim2 and Gboyega A Ogunbanjo3
 
 Summary

A major pre-requisite for polio-free certification by the World Health Organization is that the local surveillance system successfully detects one case of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) per 100 000 children below 15 years of age per annum and that no cases of polio occur for three consecutive years. Mpumalanga, a rural province in the northeast of South Africa, implemented an enhanced surveillance system, which consisted of training hospital ICNs to rapidly report and correctly respond to nine infectious disease syndromes, including AFP. Weekly zero reporting is a component of the system. The non-polio AFP reporting rate per 100 000 children below the age of 15 years increased from 0.56 in 1997 to 0.91 in 1998 after introduction of the enhanced surveillance system, with more than 80% of the units reporting weekly. All units reported weekly from April 1999 to December 2001. Although non-polio AFP reporting rates were 0.27 (1999), 1.18 (2000) and 0.87 (2001), the 95% binomial exact confidence intervals for all years included 1 per 100 000. A review of paediatric admissions from January 1998 to December 2001 at all hospitals revealed that only five AFP cases had been missed by the enhanced surveillance system. The low international AFP reference rate and attendant variation expected due to chance, particularly in areas with relatively small populations, is an important factor that deserves more attention as we approach global polio eradication.

 
Access Full Article HTML    Access Full Article PDF
 

1Communicable Disease Control, Mpumalanga Department of Health, South Africa 2School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University, Australia 3Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Medical University of Southern Africa, South Africa

 
To cite this article
Harris, Bernice N, Dürrheim, David N & Ogunbanjo, Gboyega A
Polio eradication - the validity of surveillance indicators.
Tropical Medicine & International Health 8 (5), 386-391.
doi: 10.1046/
j.1365-3156.2003.01048.x

 

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.