Vaccination News Home Page            Scandals            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/157/5/456

JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
SEARCH THIS JOURNAL
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES COLLECTIONS CONTACT US HELP

 
Vol. 157 No. 5, May 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Featured Link
 •  E-mail Alerts
Article
 Article Options
 • Full text
 • PDF
 • Send to a Friend
 • Readers Reply
   •Submit a reply
 • Similar articles in this journal
 Literature Track
 • Add to File Drawer
 • Download to Citation Manager
 • PubMed citation
 • Articles in PubMed by
   •Ashkar SH
   •Hurwitz EL
 • Contact me when this article is cited
 Topic Collections
 • Immunization
 • Pediatrics, Other
 • Collection E-mail Alerts


The Effectiveness of Assessment and Referral on Immunization Coverage in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

Susan H. Ashkar, MA; Loring G. Dales, MD; Francisco Averhoff, MD, MPH; Abigail Shefer, MD; Jeffrey Higa, MPH; Lisa Thompson, MPH; Judy Gomez, MPH, RD; Denise C. Gee, MPH, RD; Eric L. Hurwitz, DC, PhD
 

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:456-462.

Background  The use of immunization assessment and referral (A/R) in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) has been shown to produce dramatic improvements in vaccination coverage when coupled with parental incentive; however, data are lacking to support the use of A/R alone.

Objective  To determine the effectiveness of A/R in increasing immunization coverage among WIC participants.

Design  Participating WIC centers were assigned to1 of 3 interventions that delivered A/R of varying frequency or a control group.

Setting  Twenty of the largest Public Health Foundation Enterprises–WIC centers in Los Angeles County.

Participants  Children continuously enrolled in participating WIC centers from 6 to 24 months of age.

Intervention  Assessment of child's vaccination status followed by referral to a health care provider for those lacking indicated vaccinations.

Main Outcome Measure  Up-to-date (UTD) status at 24 months of age for all recommended vaccines.

Results  Baseline coverage rates were similar among all study sites (overall, 77% UTD). After the study period, compared with the controls (88% UTD), we found no differences in immunization coverage among WIC centers that administered A/R at every visit (every 2 months) to all children (90% UTD; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.94), every 6 months to all children (89% UTD; OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.62-1.56), or every visit to children found to be behind at 8 months of age (89% UTD; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.48-1.68).

Conclusion  In this urban population of WIC children with high baseline immunization coverage, A/R was not effective in increasing immunization coverage.


From the Department of Health Services, Public Health, Immunization Program, County of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (Mss Ashkar and Thompson and Mr Higa); the Department of Health Services, Immunization Branch, State of California, Berkeley (Dr Dales); the National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Drs Averhoff and Shefer); Public Health Foundation Enterprises, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children, Irwindale, Calif (Mss Gomez and Gee); and the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (Dr Hurwitz). Mr Higa is now with the Department of Health Services, Infectious Diseases Branch, State of California, Gardena; Ms Thompson, the Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles.


 

HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | CONTACT US | HELP
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Vaccination News Home Page

 

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.