Lost, Mishandled Evidence May Mean New
Appeals
Reprinted with permission from:
Forida Prison Legal Perspectives
Vol. 6, Issue 6; ISSN#: 1091-8094
ORLANDO
Stunning revelations of forensic evidence missing from or mishandled
by the Medical Examiners Office for Orange and Osceola Counties,
located in Central Florida, shocked public defenders, defense
attorneys and Floridians during October and may lead to a wave of
new post conviction appeals by dozens or even hundreds of criminal
defendants who are still in prison.
According to a report that was only recently released, during the
mid-1990s, specifically in 1994 and 1995, the Orange-Osceola Medical
Examiners Office lost bullets, blood, hair and other evidence in
murder cases without informing police, prosecutors, public
defenders, or defense attorneys. Chief Public Defender Bob Wesley
noted that at least 26 cases from 1994 and 1995 may be involved
after he reviewed the 66-page report that was written in 1995 but
that didnt surface until this September.
Among
the findings of an in-house report were missing evidence lists and
logs; bags and boxes of evidence in hundreds of cases that had been
cut open or had their seals broken; bones, teeth and skulls without
identification of any kind; and missing money and drugs, along, with
missing bullets and tissue scrapings from under murder victims
fingernails.
From
a forensic standpoint, I was shocked, said Orange County sheriffs
Sgt. Robert Corriveau, who was lent to the Medical Examiners Office
in 1995 to supervise an inventory after it was found the evidence
stored there was in total disarray. He described what he found as a
legal nightmare. Many evidence bags were ripped open or unsealed,
there was no way to know how many cases had been cross-
contaminated.
A
further revelation that recently came to light is that Dr. Shashi
Gore, who has run the Medical Examiners Office since 1996, lacks
board certification as a forensic pathologist. Worse, none of the
other doctors there are board-certified forensic pathologists.
Orange County officials who had knowledge of the massive problem 7
years ago but who kept quiet about it, and prosecutors who claim
they only recently learned about it, are now claiming its really no
big deal. Others are saying different.
Carol
Gross, office manager for the Medical Examiners Office in 1995,
said, This put our credibility at high risk.
Joe
DuRocher, Orange-Osceota chief public defender in 1995, said, There
is no question in my mind something as significant as this
investigation should have been revealed to the public defenders
office.
More
than just murder cases may be impacted by this now-revealed fiasco.
Insurance cases may also be affected. However, Orange County
officials have stated they do not intend to review the 1994 and 1995
cases further without specific request from attorneys or law
enforcement.
The
following statement has been made by the Ninth judicial Circuit
Public Defenders Office:
"Defendants and inmates who believe their cases may be affected by
the controversy at the medical Examiners Office should consider
consulting an attorney. Assuming the fact that evidence problems
exist(ed) at the Medical Examiners Office, and that these problems
were not previously disclosed at the time of trial or plea, an
inmate might seek the advice of an attorney to discuss: (1) whether
evidence in their case was mishandled, mislabeled, contaminated,
lost or destroyed by the ME Office; (2) whether favorable
exculpatory or impeachment evidence was suppressed related to the ME
Office; (3) the general reliability, credibility, and competence of
work performed by the MEs Office; and (4) whether they have a
remedy, e.g. petition for writ of habeas corpus and/or motion for
post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
3.850."
[Sources: Orlando Sentinel, 9/30, 10/2, 10/5, 10/6,
10/11/02;
Ninth Judicial Circuit Public Defenders Office]
|