WHO Revises Method of Calculating
Mortality; Illness More Deadly to Elderly
The wife of a
hospital nurse killed by SARS holds roses as
she prays for her husband, Lau Wing-kai, 38,
during a burial ceremony in Hong Kong.
(Vincent Yu -- AP)
Reporter's
Query
Have a Question
about SARS?
The Health section is collecting reader
questions about risks, protections,
precautions, products and related topics
and will begin publishing responses over the
coming weeks. We can't reply directly to
questions, but we'll answer as many
questions as possible in print. Send your
questions to
health@washpost.com.
NOTE: Numbers reflect
statistics on probable cases as of May 20
SOURCES: World Health Organization, CDC
By Rob Stein and Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, May 8, 2003; Page A26
The death rate from severe acute respiratory syndrome has
increased sharply since the epidemic began, and the new lung
infection is now killing about 15 percent of victims overall, the
World Health Organization concluded yesterday.
It remains unclear whether the death rate is increasing as the
disease spreads, or whether the true death rate is simply emerging
as more data become available. In either case, the relatively high
death rate underscores the seriousness of the threat, WHO said.
"This is a disease that has a high case-fatality rate," said
Klaus Stohr, WHO's top SARS scientist. "The case-fatality rate that
we're seeing emphasizes even further the need to act decisively
now."
According to the new calculations, SARS kills less than 1 percent
of those 24 or younger, but the death rate jumps to 6 percent at
ages 25 to 44, to 15 percent for those 45 to 64 and to more than 50
percent for those 65 and older, WHO said.
That means SARS has a death rate far higher than those of most
other respiratory infections. The typical flu season has a death
rate of less than 1 percent. The devastating Spanish flu of 1918 to
1919 had a death rate of less than 3 percent.
SARS does not appear to be as contagious as the flu, but it is
the first dangerous new disease that can be spread directly from one
person to another to emerge in decades, and it remains untreatable.
"We don't want to add to panic," Stohr said. "But we want to show
that this disease should not be underestimated."
The new estimates are based on an analysis of the most recent
data from everywhere SARS has erupted -- Canada, China, Singapore,
Vietnam and Hong Kong -- and represent the first attempt to produce
a comprehensive picture of the disease's mortality, WHO said. An
independent estimate released the day before in the Lancet medical
journal, which looked only at Hong Kong, projected that the
mortality rate there could eventually hit about 20 percent.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
under intense pressure from WHO, said yesterday that it will begin
reporting more detailed information on SARS cases as early as today.
The CDC has refused to release specific data on the 63 probable
SARS cases it has been tracking, notably how and where those
patients were infected, whether they spread SARS to others, their
ages, medical history and travel patterns.
The Atlanta-based agency has instead released state-by-state
figures on suspected and probable cases and has characterized them
only in general terms. WHO experts said that without the more
detailed information, it becomes far more difficult, if not
impossible, to monitor the worldwide trends of the epidemic.
"We need to make sure we know where disease is occurring and that
disease is not exported from those sites to other countries," said
David L. Heymann, who heads WHO's communicable diseases division.
No one has suggested that the United States is "exporting" SARS
cases, but the information gleaned here could help scientists track
the movement of the virus and better understand how it behaves.
If federal health officials were to learn, for instance, that a
patient in the United States had likely contracted the illness in a
country that has not been identified as a SARS hot spot, that could
be an early warning of another problem area. Similarly, if new cases
arise in individuals who recently traveled to Canada or Vietnam,
that would suggest that those countries have not put the outbreak
behind them.
"Infectious diseases know and respect no borders," Heymann told
members of a House oversight panel at a hearing yesterday.
"Information provided early can help nations stop outbreaks."
WHO initially estimated that the death rate from SARS was less
than 4 percent. The estimate climbed to a range of 6 percent to 10
percent in recent weeks as the toll mounted.
WHO said the mortality rate ranges from a low of 8 percent in
Hanoi, the site of one of the earliest outbreaks, to a high of 15
percent to 19 percent in Canada. Hong Kong currently has a death
rate of 11 percent to 17 percent, compared with 13 percent to 15
percent in Singapore and 5 percent to 13 percent in China.
The variations among countries, and the rising death rate
overall, may be the result of the disease hitting older people
during later outbreaks. It could also be the result of the disease
producing a more lethal form of the illness in some places, such as
Hong Kong, or simply that enough time has passed to get a more
accurate estimate, Stohr said.
"Overall, the case-fatality rate has increased globally. That we
know. There appears to be an evolution over time," Stohr said.
The death rate from SARS has been the focus of intense debate.
Initially, WHO calculated the death rate by dividing the number of
deaths by the number of cases. But some experts said that
underestimated the death rate because it failed to take into
consideration that many people who were hospitalized would not
survive. WHO defended its previous calculations, saying the earlier
method was the only one available in the early days of the epidemic.
Christl A. Donnelly, an epidemiologist at Imperial College in
London who worked on the Lancet study, said she was pleased that
WHO's estimates were coming into line with her group's. She said the
findings emphasize the need to identify infected people as soon
possible so they can be isolated before they can transmit the virus
to anyone else.
"You need to avoid infections as soon as possible. If you can get
people who are infected and show the onset of symptoms, you have to
get them out of the community to reduce the risk of further
transmission," Donnelly said.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"