Vaccination News Home Page            Scandals            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/5/976

Full Text of this Article Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article Email this article to a friend P3Rs: Submit a response to this article Similar articles found in: Pediatrics Online PubMed PubMed Citation This Article has been cited by: other online articles Search Medline for articles by: Carroll, A. E. || Christakis, D. A. Alert me when: new articles cite this article   Download to Citation Manager

Collections under which this article appears: Office Practice

PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 5 May 2003, pp. 976-980

 

Resident Documentation Discrepancies in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Aaron E. Carroll, MD^*,, Peter Tarczy-Hornoch, MD^,, Eamon O’Reilly and Dimitri A. Christakis, MD, MPH^,||

^* Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
^|| Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Context. Medical errors are common and potentially dangerous. Little is known about the role of documentation errors.

Objective. To determine the proportion of resident physician progress notes that contained discrepancies, and to identify predictors of such discrepancies.

Design/Methods. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional chart review of resident physician progress notes over 40 random days in a 4-month period in a neonatal intensive care unit. Using predetermined criteria, we compared resident documentation of patient weights, medications, and vascular lines to other sources of information and recorded the numbers of documentation discrepancies.

Results. There were discrepancies in 209 (61.7%) notes with respect to weight, vascular lines, or medications. Discrepancies occurred in the documentation of medications in 103 (27.7%) progress notes, of vascular lines in 119 (33.9%) progress notes, and of weights in 45 (13.3%) progress notes. Notes both omitted information regarding medications (18.2%) and vascular lines (13.9%) and documented inaccurate information regarding medications (18.6%) and vascular lines (30.1%). Patients with more medications or vascular lines, and with longer lengths of stay, were significantly more likely to have higher rates of documentation errors.

Conclusions. Daily progress notes written by resident physicians in the neonatal intensive care unit often contain inaccurate, or omit pertinent, information. Alternative means or methods of documentation are warranted.

Key Words: resident • documentation • errors • NICU

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • prn, as needed • IRR, incident rate ratio • CI, confidence interval

Received for publication Jun 10, 2002; accepted Sep 12, 2002.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Suresh Don't Believe Everything You Read in the Patient's Chart Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1108 - 1109. [Full Text] [PDF]

Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. [Disclaimer]

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.