Cerebral palsy is a physical impairment that affects the development of
movement. Impairment can vary considerably and notwo people with
cerebral palsy are affected in exactly the sameway. The problems
that children and adults with cerebral palsyface, including
discrimination, are often similar
Cerebral palsy is the most common physical disability in childhood. Children
with cerebral palsy usually survive into adulthood,and the condition
is often poorly understood in adulthood. Recognisingand managing
cerebral palsy's many important comorbidities isas important as
treating the motor disabilities. Recent advancesin the understanding
of cerebral palsy include new ways of thinkingabout disability;
recognition of causal pathways; and improvementsin measurement,
classification, and prognostication. Challengesinclude ensuring the
wellbeing of families as well as children;tackling the issues faced
lifelong by people with cerebral palsy;and the continuing need for
primary, secondary, and tertiary preventionof the effects of
cerebral palsy on people's lives.
Summary points
Cerebral palsies are neurodevelopmental conditions, are the
commonest "physical" disabilities in childhood, and severely
affect a child's development
Comorbidities include epilepsy, learning difficulties,
behavioural challenges, and sensory impairments and are at
least as important as the motor disabilities
Advances in research are increasing our understanding of
causal pathways, opportunities for primary prevention, and the
value of specific intervention strategies
Cerebral palsy cannot be cured, but a host of interventions
can improve functional abilities, participation, and quality
of life
These conditions need to be recognised as involving the
whole family, and management should always occur in the
context of family needs, values, and abilities
The needs of adults with cerebral palsy, who currently are
underemployed and face major barriers in the community, must
now be tackled
Cerebral palsy is "an umbrella term covering a group of non-progressive, but
often changing, motor impairment syndromes secondaryto lesions or
anomalies of the brain arising in the early stagesof development."1 A total of 2-2.5 of every 1000 live born
children in the Western world have the condition2;
incidenceis higher in premature infants and in twin births.
34 Some
causal pathways have been described, which make it possible to
prevent, for example, athetoid cerebral palsy due to kernicterus
associated with Rh isoimmunisation, and potentially to eliminate
cerebral palsy associated with maternal iodine deficiency. 25 The common perception that perinatal asphyxia is
an importantcause of cerebral palsy almost certainly overstates the
case6;occult infection or inflammation
is increasing implicated.7Often a cause
cannot be found in the history of children withclear clinical
evidence of cerebralpalsy.
Many efforts are under way in the basic and clinical sciences to describe the
cascades of pathophysiological events that causeneurological damage,
particularly in compromised premature infants.8As the mechanisms of injury to the developing central nervous
system are better understood, neuroprotective agents are likelyto
play an increasing role in continuing efforts at primary prevention
of cerebralpalsy.
Cerebral palsy, except in its mildest forms, can be seen in the first 12 to
18 months of life. The condition presents whenchildren fail to reach
their motor milestones and when they showqualitative differences in
motor development, such as asymmetricgross motor function or unusual
muscle stiffness or floppiness.Cerebral palsy is usually
characterised clinically by the partsof the body affected (box
1), although conventional terminologyused to
describe cerebral palsy is less precise or reliable thanthe terms
imply. Descriptions of the predominant motor disorderrefer to
spastic, dystonic, athetotic, and ataxic features (box2).9 Functional status can be
categorised (with respect togross motor activity) by using the five
levels of the gross motorfunction classification system for cerebral
palsy (box 3),10a
reliable and valid system with prognostic importance now availableon
the CanChild web page (box 4). 1112
Box
1: Topography of cerebral palsy
Hemiparesis (hemiplegia)(predominantly) unilateral
impairment of arm and leg on the same
side
Diplegiamotor
impairment primarily of the legs
(usually with some relatively limited
involvement of arms)
Triplegiathree
limb involvement
Quadriplegia (tetraplegia)all four limbs, in fact the
whole body, are functionally
compromised
Box
2: European classification of (motor impairment in)
cerebral palsy9
Spastic
cerebral palsy is characterised by at least
two of
Abnormal movement pattern of posture or
movement
Increased tone (not necessarily constant)
Pathological reflexes (increased
reflexes, hyperreflexia, or pyramidal signsfor
example, Babinski response)
Spastic bilateral cerebral palsy is
diagnosed if
Limbs on both sides of the body are
involved
Spastic unilateral cerebral palsy is
diagnosed if
Limbs on one side of the body are
involved
Ataxic cerebral palsy is characterised by
both
Abnormal pattern of posture and/or
movement
Loss of orderly muscular coordination so
that movements are performed with abnormal
force, rhythm, and accuracy
Dyskinetic cerebral palsy is dominated by
both
Abnormal pattern of posture or movement
Involuntary, uncontrolled, recurring, and
occasionally stereotyped movements
Dystonic cerebral palsy is dominated by
both
Hypokinesia (reduced activitystiff
movement)
Hypertonia (tone usually increased)
Choreoathetotic cerebral palsy is
dominated by both
Hyperkinesia (increased activitystormy
movement)
Hypotonia (tone usually decreased)
Box
3: Severity of cerebral palsy: gross motor function
classification system (for children between 6 and
12 years)10
Level IWalks
without restrictions; limitations in more
advanced gross motor skills
Level IIWalks without devices;
limitations in walking outdoors and in the
community
Level IIIWalks with mobility devices;
limitations in walking outdoors and in the
community
Level IVSelf mobility with limitations;
children are transported or use power
mobility outdoors and in the community
Level VSelf mobility is severely limited
even with the use of supporting technology
Cerebral palsy is in many ways the prototype for developmental disabilities.
By definition the problems stem from one of manyimpairments of the
developing central nervous system.2 Cerebralpalsy affects gross motor function to a varying extent. A child'sresulting overall development, specifically in mobility and otheraspects of development and learning, is compromised by relative
deprivation of experience. Delayed or aberrant motor functionaffects
the development of a child's capacity to explore activelyand to
learn about space, effort, independence, and the socialconsequences
of moving, touching, and getting into mischief. Limitsto a child's
functioning can cause parents to perceive their childas damaged,
impaired, or disabled (and therefore limited); parentsmay interact
with their child differently than if the child hadbetter
function.
People with cerebral palsy are considerably more likely to have functional
difficulties unrelated to movement but relatedto their central
nervous system (including sensory, epileptic,learning, behavioural,
and related developmental impairments).13These impairments may begin early in life as difficulties in feeding,irritability, and disordered sleep patterns. These problems, whenpresent, affect day to day life and can cause considerable distressto children, parents, and carers. These problems are not inevitableor intractable, but it is essential to ask about, identify, and
intervene before problems become entrenched.
(Credit: WILL AND DENI MCINTYRE/SPL)
Children with chronic functional limitations have considerably more
difficulties in the social and behavioural aspects oftheir lives
than typical children.14 Intellectual and
behaviouralproblems in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
reported byteachers in mainstream schools indicate that such
children areat high risk of rejection by peers, lack of friends, and
victimisation.15It is essential to
recognise the coexistence of physical functionaland neurobehavioural
disabilities in children with cerebral palsyand to provide
integrated services to tackle these manifestations.16
From the outset parents want to know how "bad" the cerebral palsy is and
whether their child will walk. These questions canbe difficult to
answer, particularly for healthcare professionalswith limited
experience of children with the condition. The literatureon truth
disclosure and communication with patients and familiescalls
unequivocally for honesty, openness, communication withboth parents
together, and sensitivity to the individual needsof each family.17 A reliable and validated functional classificationsystem for cerebral palsy9 that carries
prognostic informationhas made it possible to provide evidence based
answers to informboth parents and service providers (fig
1).12 In future this
information may also be used to develop intervention programmes
appropriate to a child's age and stage.
Fig 1. Predicted
average development of gross motor ability for each
category of the gross motor function classification
system (level I to level V). Dashed lines show the age
in years at which children are expected to achieve 90%
of their potential for motor development. A to D on the
vertical axis identify four gross motor items, located
where children are expected to have a 50% chance of
successfully completing that item. A=therapist holds
child sitting upright, child lifts head for 3 seconds;
B=child maintains sitting, arms free, for 3 seconds;
C=child walks forward 10 steps; D=child walks down
4 steps, alternating feet12
Cerebral palsy cannot be cured. The World Health Organization's model of
health and disease focuses on function and is animportant framework
to guide modern thinking about treatment forchildren with cerebral
palsy (fig 2).18 The goals of
managementshould be to use appropriate combinations of interventions
(includingdevelopmental, physical, medical, surgical, chemical, and
technicalmodalities) to promote function, to prevent secondary
impairmentsand, above all, to increase a child's developmental
capabilities.
Fig 2. World
Health Organization model of the international
classification of functioning, disability, and health
Many of the conventional approaches used in developmental treatment more or
less target the primary impairments that underliethe functional
challenges faced by children with cerebral palsy.With increased
emphasis on promoting function, two important issuesshould be
considered. Firstly, there is a need to move beyondefforts to
promote normal function in children with cerebral palsy(often an
illusory goal) toward the achievement of functionalabilities that
facilitate independence. Secondly, the liberaluse of adaptive
equipmentfor example, powered mobility or walkersmay
support early development of capacities such as independent ability
to move about with the important effect of improving overall
development.
The common concern that making things too easy for children will inhibit
normal function is unfounded; there is strong evidencethat, for
example, the provision of powered mobility to childrenwith
disabilities as young as 36 months can have pervasive impactson
social, language, and play skills as well as increase effortsto try
independent movement.19 A similar argument can be
madefor the early introduction of augmentative communication systemsfor children with communicative difficultiesfor example,
signlanguage, and picture boardswhich make communication
possibleand often help to promote the development of oral language.
Parentsare often initially reluctant to accept augmentative
interventions,preferring to work toward normal function. Introducing
new parentsto others who have chosen to provide devices to their
childrencan be helpful to let the experienced parents discuss how
theymade the decisions about the use of equipment and sharing theirperceptions about the value (or not) of this specialequipment.
Modern services for child health are increasingly being offered within a
framework that espouses family centred service.20Parents and providers work together in a partnership quite differentfrom the traditional management of a child's rehabilitation programmedirected by a doctor. These new relationships are predicated on
mutual respect, empowered parents, and appropriate sharing of
information with which decisions can be made. Parents' experiencesof
family centred service and their satisfaction with services,as well
as the stress they experience in their dealings with theirchild's
treatment centre, are strongly correlated.21 There
isalso a measurable link between family centred service and parents'mental health.22
Parental values and goals can form an important component of the management
programme that is created for a child. Goal settingshould be a joint
venture between parents (and older children)and healthcare
providers. This approach has recently been shownto lead to more
effective outcomes and to be more efficient interms of the amount of
intervention by professionals.23 Froma
developmental perspective this finding makes senseparents andespecially children are more likely to follow through with recommendationsfor treatment that tackle their goals and needs. (Some parents
may wish professionals to make decisions for them; an active choice
by parents to be advised what to do is still a family centred
approach to delivering services.)
Cerebral palsy is a long term condition; parents (and people with cerebral
palsy) will have questions and issues to resolvethroughout their
lives. Continuity in the relationship betweenparents and trusted
counsellors is important; professionals suchas family doctors and
therapists are people who will listen, support,advocate, and be
there when challenges arise. Challenges are especiallylikely at
times of transition in the life of the child and family,such as at
the time of diagnosis, starting primary or secondaryschool, leaving
school, and when entry to the broader communityis being considered.
Continuous and consistent service is valuedby parents.24
The array of biomedical and surgical innovations for the treatment of
cerebral palsy is ever expanding, much of it aimed atthe reduction
of what can at times be disabling spasticity. Theseinclude the use
of botulinum toxin for temporary relief of spasticity,25selective dorsal rhizotomy for more permanent relief,26
andintrathecal baclofen as a titratable antispasticity agent.27Recent work to promote strength
training for people with cerebralpalsy may provide important new
avenues to improve function.28
At the same time as innovative treatments are being developed, complementary
treatments have emerged.29 These approachesrange from apparently sensible but untested methods of teaching,training, or treating children (such as conductive education basedon educational principles, which is as effective as, but not betterthan, conventional approaches),30 to
interventions based onanecdotal evidence and testimonials but
usually no credible research.New treatments are greeted with an
expectation of impact thatrarely happens. One such innovation which
has attracted a lotof attention in the past few years is the use of
hyperbaric oxygen,an approach that has been clearly shown in a well
designed randomisedclinical trial to provide no benefit.31 Other essentially untestedideas
include subthreshold electrical stimulation of muscles,intensive
passive muscle manipulation (patterning), and the useof an astronaut
suit to promote independent mobility. In eachcase the claims about
the effectiveness of the treatments areunsupported by solid clinical
trial based research.32
Doctors are often called on to advise about treatment approaches with which
they are unfamiliar. Specialty organisations suchas Scope in the
United Kingdom and UCPA in the United States,and research groups
such CanChild in Canada have well developedwebsites (box
4). These websites may provide information on topicsthat are not available in published literature about complementarytreatment (because so little research on these modalities has
beenundertaken).
Considerable research efforts are under way toward the primary prevention of
brain injury in infants at high risk who areexposed to perinatal
abuse. Although most of this work is stillat the development stage,
clinical trials will soon be under wayto evaluate a host ofstrategies.
An important and growing concern is the unmet needs of young adults with
cerebral palsy. Community services for adults areoften ill prepared
to understand, let alone to meet, the needsof today's young people
with disabilities, who have generallygrown up at home and in the
community and have been more integratedthan children with cerebral
palsy in any previous generation.33The
challenge to be addressed by service providers, educators,
prospective employers, policy makers, and others is to begin to
anticipate and plan appropriately for the full incorporation of
adults with cerebral palsy into the life of their community, agoal
fully consistent with the World Health Organization's focuson
participation. This challenge is one that must be addressedby the
whole community, and should involve the imagination andpolitical
will of professionals and families from all areas ofsociety. To do
less would be to marginalise young people withcerebral palsy and to
squander the developmental and functionalgains they have made in
their developing years.
Box
4: Website resources for parents and doctors
CanChild
Centre for Childhood Disability Research (www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/canchild)Many
downloadable resources for service providers
and parents on its website and links to
several other related websites
United Cerebral Palsy Association (www.ucpa.org/ucp_general.cfm/1/4)Links to
their Research and Educational Foundation on
its website, where more than 100 fact sheets
are posted on topics of interest to parents
and service providers
Scope (www.scope.org.uk)A UK based
organisation concerned with the needs of
people with cerebral palsy
Mac Keith Press (distributed by Cambridge
University Press) (http://publishing.cambridge.org/stm/medicine/mackeith)Publishes
Developmental Medicine and Child
Neurology, the most highly cited
developmental journal in the world, and
Clinics in Developmental Medicine, an
ongoing series of more than 160 books on a
wide variety of topics pertinent to
developmental disabilities of childhood
American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and
Developmental Medicine (www.aacpdm.org)The
pre-eminent multiprofessional childhood
disability organisation in the world. Their
website links to resources for parents as
well as professionals. The academy's annual
meeting draws several hundred professionals
from around the world to attend symposiums
and instructional courses and give papers on
topics concerned with cerebral palsy and
related developmental issues
European Academy of Childhood Disability
(www.eacd-org.org)Presents an
annual conference tackling issues in
childhood disability offering symposiums and
workshops of interest to professionals
Acknowledgments
I thank Doreen Bartlett, Robert Palisano, Richard Stevenson, and Martin Bax.
I also thank colleagues at CanChild Centre forChildhood DisabilityResearch.
Contributors: PR reviewed contemporary information and concepts about
cerebral palsy drawn from his clinical and research experience and the current
literature.
Mutch LW, Alberman E, Hagberg B, Kodama K,
Velickovic MV. Cerebral palsy epidemiology: where are we now and
where are we going? Dev Med Child Neurol 1992; 34: 547-555[ISI][Medline].
Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a
collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med
Child Neurol 2000; 42: 816-824[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell DJ,
Wood EP, Galuppi BE. Development and reliability of a system to
classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.
Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 214-223[ISI][Medline].
Wood EP, Rosenbaum PL. The gross motor function
classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and
stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol 2000; 42: 292-296[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Hanna SE, Palisano RJ,
Russell DJ, Raina R, et al. Prognosis for gross motor function in
cerebral palsy: creation of motor development curves. JAMA
2002; 288: 1357-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
Kennes J, Rosenbaum P, Hanna SE, Walter S, Russell
D, Raina P, et al. Health status of school-aged children with
cerebral palsy: information from a population-based sample. Dev
Med Child Neurol 2002; 44: 240-247[ISI][Medline].
Cadman D, Boyle M, Szatmari P, Offord DR. Chronic
illness, disability, and mental and social well-being: findings of
the Ontario child health study. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 805-813[Abstract].
Yude C, Goodman R. Peer problems of 9-11-year-old
children with hemiplegia in mainstream school: can these be
predicted? Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 4-8[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Cunningham CC, Morgan PA, McGucken RB. Down's
syndrome: is dissatisfaction with disclosure of diagnosis
inevitable? Dev Med Child Neurol 1984; 26: 33-39[ISI][Medline].
Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, King G, Evans J.
Family-centred services: a conceptual framework and research review.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 1998; 18: 1-20.
King S, Rosenbaum P, King G. Parents' perceptions
of care-giving: development and validation of a process measure.
Dev Med Child Neurol 1996; 38: 757-772[ISI][Medline].
King G, King S, Rosenbaum P, Goffin R.
Family-centred caregiving and well-being of parents of children with
disabilities: linking process with outcome. J Ped Psychol
1999; 24: 41-52[CrossRef][ISI].
Ketelaar M, Vermeer A, Hart H, van Petegem-van Beek
E, Helders PJ. Effects of a functional therapy program on motor
abilities of children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther 2001;
81: 1534-1545[ISI][Medline].
Breslau N, Mortimer EA. Seeing the same doctor:
determinants of satisfaction with specialty care for disabled
children. Med Care 1981; 19: 741-757[ISI][Medline].
Edgar TS. Clinical utility of botulinum toxin in
the treatment of cerebral palsy: a comprehensive review. J Child
Neurol 2001; 16: 37-46[ISI][Medline].
McLaughlin J, Bjornson K, Temkin N, Steinbok P,
Wright V, Reiner A, et al. Selective dorsal rhizotomy: meta-analysis
of three randomised controlled trials. Dev Med Child Neurol
2002; 44: 17-25[ISI][Medline].
Butler C, Campbell S. Evidence of the effects of
intrathecal baclofen for spastic and dystonic cerebral palsy. AACPDM
treatment outcomes committee review panel. Dev Med Child Neurol
2000; 42: 634-645[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Dodd KJ, Taylor NF, Damiano DL. A systematic review
of the effectiveness of strength-training programs for people with
cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1157-1164[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
Reddihough DS, King J, Coleman G, Catanese T.
Efficacy of programmes based on conductive education for young
children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 1998; 40:
763-770[ISI][Medline].
Collet JP, Vanasse M, Marois P, Amar M, Goldberg J,
Lambert J, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for children with cerebral
palsy: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet 2001; 357:
582-586[CrossRef][ISI][Medline].
(HBO-CP research group.)
Rosenbaum PL. Controversial treatment of
spasticity: exploring alternative therapies for motor function in
children with cerebral palsy. J Ped Neurol 2003 (in press).
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"