Minnesota kids will need two new shots, judge rules
Jill Burcum, Star Tribune
Published April 30, 2003
Beginning in the fall of 2004, kids in Minnesota schools and day-care centers
will likely need to be vaccinated against chickenpox and a bacterial infection
that can lead to meningitis or pneumonia.
An administrative law judge on Tuesday upheld a Minnesota Health Department
plan to add to the state's roster of required childhood shots two new vaccines
protecting against the chickenpox virus and pneumococcal bacteria.
Health officials proposed the new vaccinations in July, sparking debate over
vaccines in Minnesota as opponents of childhood shots questioned the safety of
all shots. Childhood vaccines protect against polio, measles, tetanus and other
diseases.
The judge's approval, one of the last steps required for the rule to take
effect, does not change Minnesota parents' ability to have their children
exempted from vaccinations for medical or personal reasons. The proposal now
goes to Gov. Tim Pawlenty for review.
Judge Kathleen Sheehy, of the state Office of Administrative Hearings, said
in her decision that the two vaccines are recommended by almost all major
medical organizations. The judge noted that many states already require the
vaccinations. She wrote that state health officials had proved the shots are
needed.
Although chickenpox is often considered a benign disease, its complications
include pneumonia or encephalitis. Data submitted to Sheehy by the Health
Department indicated that the number of people hospitalized for chickenpox
complications in Minnesota has dropped 80 percent since 1995, when children
began getting the vaccine voluntarily.
Health officials also reported that the rate of severe pneumococcal disease
for children under age 2 in Minnesota has declined from an annual average of 208
cases per 100,000 from 1996 through 1999, to 62.5 cases per 100,000 in 2001. The
U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the pneumococcal vaccine, Prevnar, in
February 2000. It is being used voluntarily.
Sheehy also wrote that those who objected to vaccines had not backed up their
opinions with science.
"We are very pleased that the [judge] has agreed with our position," said
Health Commissioner Dianne Mandernach. "Certainly it's our opinion that it's the
children who win in this."
Anne Becker, a staff attorney at the administrative hearing office, said
Pawlenty has 14 days to review the new vaccine rule once he receives the
paperwork. If he vetoes it, the requirement would not take effect. Calls to
Pawlenty's office were not returned Tuesday.
Becker also said the Legislature can pass a law to block the new shots.
Jerri Johnson, who helped lead the Minnesota Natural Health Coalition's
opposition to the new vaccines, said her group and other opponents will ask
Pawlenty to veto the rule, and they also will be contacting legislators.
"We would have liked to have seen a different decision," Johnson said, adding
that Sheehy overlooked problems with vaccine safety studies. "We will look to
elected officials to overturn the ruling . . . because many citizens are
concerned about this."
The Immunization Action Coalition, a national nonprofit vaccine education
group based in St. Paul, applauded the judge's decision Tuesday.
"It was the right thing to do," said Diane Peterson, the coalition's
associate director for immunization projects. "Enactment of the requirements
will help prevent serious even fatal disease."
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"