Searchers may Google your patient records
Hackers discover that search engines can help gain
unauthorized access to private patient information on Internet-based
files.
By
Tyler Chin, AMNews staff. April 7,
2003.
Come ogle my patients' data.
Unwittingly, you may be rolling out the welcome mat so any hacker can
use Google, the most popular Internet search engine, to walk into your
Web-accessible system.
In March, Wired.com reported that hackers used Google as a shortcut to
infiltrate computer networks that weren't properly secured. Instead of
blindly surfing the Web for vulnerable computer networks, hackers can use
a search engine to easily identify targets. That's because many databases
use templates and canned phrases that Internet search engines pick up as
they search and index the content posted on the Web.
In one particular instance, hackers typed into Google a phrase --
"select a database to view" -- that commonly appears in databases from
FileMaker Inc. The search engine spat out more than 200 database listings.
While most of the databases were secure or contained mundane
information, a few had sensitive information that hackers were able to
access because users hadn't changed the passwords that came with the
system.
For example, the hackers accessed a database containing personal and
medical information of more than 5,000 neurosurgery patients at the Drexel
University College of Medicine in Philadelphia by typing the name of the
database product into the user ID and password fields.
|
Physicians should periodically check to make sure
their systems haven't reverted to the factory
security defaults.
|
The hackers did not alter or copy the medical school's database, which
they accessed as part of an experiment to determine whether Google could
be used as a hacking tool. Once they discovered that it could, they
alerted Wired.com, which in turn contacted the medical school.
Drexel immediately shut down the database, which hadn't been sanctioned
by the university, said spokeswoman Linda Roth. The university also
reminded all employees of its policy against unauthorized databases and
searched its network for other unsanctioned databases, Roth said.
David Krane, a spokesman for Google, said the search engine doesn't
seek private, sensitive information. But it can capture such information
when webmasters make mistakes in configuring databases or networks.
"Google, as a search engine, is a reflection of what has been published
on the Web," Krane said. "If someone notices that there's information in
the search engine that shouldn't be posted publicly, they can go online
and ask Google to remove it," Krane said. Google will verify the authority
of the person making the request, then remove the information.
No surprise
Security consultants were not surprised by how easily hackers gained
access to Drexel's database.
It is standard practice for software -- and hardware -- companies to
ship products with the security default set to product names. So, if you
fail to change the factory defaults, anyone else who has the same database
can access it by merely typing the name of the database or its maker, said
Louis Carpenito, vice president of infosecurity business strategy at
Symantec Corp., Marshfield, Mass.
"I don't see this as a Google problem," Carpenito said. "The problem is
at the other end."
Physicians and others are vulnerable to hackers partly because it is so
easy for anyone to create and put a database on the Internet, said Tom
Walsh, an e-security consultant in the Overland Park, Kan., office of CTG
HealthCare Solutions.
"We have people out there dabbling in and creating databases because
it's easy and fun to do, but they aren't following the standard practices
for developing that application that institutions with information
technology departments would follow," Walsh said. "Technology
professionals think about security as part of their initial program
design. For non-computer professionals, security may be an afterthought,"
he said.
The first thing doctors should do when they buy technology products is
set up security, which includes changing the security defaults, Walsh
said. "They should ask vendors, 'Does the product come secure, or do I
have to go in and secure it myself at a later time?' " he said. "If the
latter's the case, what are the recommended security settings? Do they
have recommended security settings?"
Carpenito also recommends that doctors periodically check to make sure
that their systems haven't reverted back to the factory defaults. That can
happen when the application has crashed and the vendor's help desk asks
users to reinstall it.
Back to top.
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.