Protecting the Public Health:
FDA Pursues an Aggressive Enforcement Strategy
June 30, 2003
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is committed to pursuing Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act violations. Enforcement activities include warning and
untitled letters, injunctions, recalls, arrests, and convictions. Overall, these
point to dramatically increased enforcement, particularly in areas related to
the most serious threats to public health, such as arrests and convictions on
criminal charges involving potentially dangerous activities and actions against
manufacturers making misleading claims about product risks and benefits.
FDAs most decisive actions, those that remove products from the market and
that bring criminal charges against people who would harm the public, have
increased the most. Data from fiscal years 1998 to 2002 show:
Injunctions rose from 11 to 15
Recalls increased from 3532 to 5025
Arrests went from 250 to 286; and
Convictions went from 194 to 317
FDAs enforcement activities also include letters to product manufacturers
whose products are not inherently unsafe, but who engage in promotional
activities that are misleading or not truthful. While letters themselves do not
represent legal action, FDA has enhanced the legal foundation of the letters it
issues so that they can provide a solid basis for court action. [This process,
accomplished through review and enhancement of the letters by FDAs Office of
Chief Counsel, has not appreciably reduced the number of letters on promotional
activities being issued. For example, the Office of the Chief Counsel concurs
with issuance of 95 percent of the draft letters of FDAs DDMAC.] So far this
year alone, FDA has issued a dozen letters warning companies about misleading
promotions of pharmaceutical products, including:
Allergan, Inc. (BOTOX COSMETIC)
Amgen, Inc. (Procrit)
GlaxoSmithKline (Flonase)
Serono Laboratories, Inc. (Rebif)
Genpharm Inc. (Amnesteem)
Novartis Ophthalmics, Inc. (Zaditor)
Centocor, Inc. (Retavase)
Cangene Corporation (WinRho SDF)
Hoffman-La Roche Inc. (Xeloda Tablets)
Aventis Behring L.L.C. (Gammar-P I.V.)
Purdue Pharma L.P. (OxyContin)
BERLEX Laboratories (Climara)
In some cases, the letters have required the drug manufacturer involved to
take high-impact corrective actions, e.g., Purdue Pharma was required to place
prominent magazine advertisements that correct the misstatements in previous
advertisements. FDAs ability to get companies to comply is enhanced by a
commitment from the agency to pursue legal action if the company does not
address the issues raised in the letter. Finally, to deter misleading ads in the
first place, to provide an even clearer basis for enforcement activities, and to
help make sure patients get an accurate picture of risks and benefits of a drug,
FDA expects to issue clear new guidance on communicating risk and benefits in
DTC ads later this year.
FDA is also committed to enhanced enforcement activities to protect the
public health from unsubstantiated medical claims by dietary supplement
distributors. FDA enforcement activities in this area include inspections,
warning letters, seizures and injunctions, and criminal enforcement. In the past
year, FDA has acted against the following categories of products: ephedrine,
Coral Calcium, SARS products, and SeaSilver. The FDA is particularly vigilant
regarding dietary supplements that have no proven benefits yet nonetheless make
misleading claims to prevent, treat, or cure serious medical conditions,
including:
Treatments for life-threatening diseases
Weight Loss products
Autism treatments
Treatments for behavioral disorders
Treatments for SARS
Treatments for other viral illnesses
Treatments for mental retardation and Downs Syndrome
Colloidal Minerals
Supplements for smokers
Supplements for drinkers
Such claims not only cause consumers to waste their money; they also
represent significant public health threats because they may deter consumers
interested in protecting their health from using treatments that actually work.
The FDA is also increasingly leveraging the impact of its activities through
partnerships with other consumer protection and law enforcement agencies. For
example, the FDA works closely with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under a
liaison agreement that coordinates FDAs authority over claims on product
labeling and FTCs authority over advertising claims. An ongoing collaboration
between the FDA and the FTC is Operation Cure.All. Through coordination
of the activities of the FDA, FTC, Health Canada, and various state Attorneys
General, Operation Cure.All is an ongoing law enforcement and consumer
education campaign against the fraudulent marketing of supplements and other
health products on the Internet. The FDA also works with the U.S. Customs
Service to ensure that certain imported goods are targeted for automatic
detention.
FDAs most serious enforcement activities are having unprecedented success. A
noteworthy string of record-breaking penalties against medical product
manufacturers have resulted from FDA enforcement actions and Federal
investigations that involved FDA in the last two years, including two major
actions this month. These include:
$879 million settlement for conspiracy to commit violations of the
Prescription Drug Marketing Act--TAP Pharmaceuticals (October 2001)
$500 million for failure to comply with Good Manufacturing
Practices--Schering Plough (May 2002)
$355 million settlement for health care fraud--AstraZeneca (June 2003)
$92.4 million for failing to report malfunctions of a medical device
to the FDA--Guidant (June 2003)
$33.1 million in fines and forfeitures for submitting false
information to the FDA--Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (October 2001)
$30 million for failure to comply with Good Manufacturing
Practices--Wyeth Ayerst (October 2000)
$4.7 million in restitution for resale of pharmaceuticals--Northland
Provider (August 2001)
FDA has also enhanced its criminal enforcement activities related to drug
counterfeiting and to unsanitary foods.
FDA encourages those interested in learning more about the agencys
enforcement record to consult the FDA website at
www.fda.gov.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"