States may offer medical liability solutions
AMA will study medicolegal panels and laws to protect
physicians' assets to see if they could work on a national level.
By
Tanya Albert, AMNews staff. July
7, 2003.
Chicago -- While the push for
tort reform continues at the federal and state levels, physicians at the
AMA's Annual Meeting in June started to look beyond caps and began
considering other ways to improve the medical liability system.
For example, physicians want the ability to talk about errors --
defined as an unintended act or omission or a flawed system or plan that
harms or has the potential to harm a patient -- without the fear of being
named in a lawsuit. The frank discussions are a way to find problems with
the system and prevent some errors from happening in the first place,
doctors say.
"Physicians have become intimidated by the law," said Leonard J. Morse,
MD, former chair of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. "We need
to talk about issues of error and learn from those errors."
The CEJA report adopted by the AMA House of Delegates says:
- Physicians should play a central role in identifying, reducing
and preventing health care errors.
- Physicians should participate in developing reporting mechanisms
that emphasize education and system change.
- When an error occurs, physicians should offer a general
explanation regarding the nature of the error and the measures being
taken to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
- Physicians have a responsibility to provide continuity of care
to patients who have been harmed. If a patient loses trust in a
physician, another physician should step in.
- Physicians should seek changes to the current legal system to
ensure that all errors in health care can be safely and securely
reported and studied as a learning experience for all participants
in the health care system, without threat of discoverability, legal
liability or punitive action.
"A mark of a professional is those who share mistakes to not have them
repeated," said general surgeon John W. McMahon, MD, a delegate from
Montana.
Medicolegal panels and beyond
The AMA will spend the next six months studying mechanisms that some
states have found helpful in weeding out frivolous lawsuits to determine
whether the models might work on a national level. They'll report their
findings at the Interim Meeting in December.
New Mexico has had a medicolegal panel reviewing medical malpractice
cases since 1976 and doctors there have found that resolving cases at that
level has saved them legal fees.
|
New Mexico has had a medicolegal panel reviewing
medical malpractice cases since 1976.
|
"We felt we should share what's working," said delegate Steven Kaning,
MD, an Albuquerque, N.M. nephrologist.
The AMA also will study potential reforms that would limit how much of
an individual's personal assets could be used to pay jury awards that are
larger than the limits on a physician's medical liability insurance
policy.
"Asset protection varies from state to state, that's why we need a
national ground rule," said radiation oncologist Richard Pieters Jr., MD,
an alternate delegate from Massachusetts. "It's devastating to lose
supplemental retirement or college tuition funds."
In addition to the studies, the AMA will work with state medical
societies to educate physicians about Good Samaritan laws in their states
so they know to what extent they have immunity from liability when acting
as Good Samaritans.
The Association also modified its policy, advocating that each hospital
medical staff should determine whether it will require medical liability
insurance coverage as a condition of employment.
If voluntary staff members are required to have insurance, then
salaried hospital physicians should be covered by adequate insurance or
protected financially through self-insurance mechanisms that the hospital
establishes so that the burden does not fall unfairly on medical staff,
the AMA said.
Back to top.
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.