| June 26,
2003 Patients' care often deficient, study says
Proper treatment given half the time
By Rita Rubin, USA TODAY
Discussion Questions
- How long would it take to implement a system
that would provide performance data on all U.S.
doctors, as Elizabeth McGlynn suggests? What
obstacles would physicians encounter? What
oversight would be appropriate? What financial
ramifications would such a program have?
- Considering the "dangerous disconnect" that
Karen Ignagni cites between the best medical
science and actual treatment, what steps should
patients take to protect their health?
- What are the most problematic issues facing
the U.S. healthcare system today? Where does this
issue rank among them? Explain.
- What role, if any, does the medical insurance
industry play in deficient patient care? What
steps might managed care take to ensure proper
treatment? Explain.
|
On average, doctors provide
appropriate health care only about half the time, a landmark study
of adults in 12 U.S. metropolitan areas suggests.
Such deficiencies "pose serious threats to the health of the
American public" that lead to tens of thousands of preventable
deaths each year, researchers report in today's New England Journal
of Medicine.
The authors say their work is the largest and most comprehensive
examination of the quality of health care in the USA. Though the
study stopped short of linking inappropriate care to the poor health
or death of individual patients, it shows that Americans cannot take
for granted that they're getting good care, says lead author
Elizabeth McGlynn, associate director of RAND Health.
The study involved 7,528 adults who participated in a telephone
interview about their health history and provided access to their
medical records.
Researchers used the records to assess care for 30 common
conditions as well as preventive care. They based their evaluation
on 439 indicators of quality gleaned from established national
guidelines and medical literature. For example, if patients had high
blood pressure, researchers checked whether their doctors had
changed their medication to better control blood pressure. For
preventive care, researchers examined factors such as cancer
screening and flu shots for the elderly.
Overall, patients' medical charts showed that doctors provided
55% of appropriate care. On average, that proportion varied little
among the chronic, acute or preventive care categories. McGlynn
acknowledges that it's possible that doctors didn't write everything
down in patients' charts. But that in itself represents poor-quality
care, she says. "How can they proactively follow up on something if
they don't have a note on the chart?"
The key to improving health care quality would be to provide
performance data on all U.S. doctors, McGlynn says. Such a step
would require "a major overhaul of our current health information
systems," she and her colleagues write.
Carolyn Clancy, director of the Agency for Health Quality and
Research, says Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson is
eager to switch to a more efficient paperless health care system.
In an accompanying editorial, Earl Steinberg writes that it's
"ludicrous" to expect physicians to keep up with hundreds of
practice guidelines without a computerized system. "I reliably
receive reminders when my dog needs a vaccination," writes
Steinberg, of Johns Hopkins University. "Physicians and patients
should also receive computer-driven reminders."
Karen Ignagni, president
of the American Association of Health Plans, commended the study in
a statement: "We couldn't agree more that consumers in America's
health care system face a dangerous disconnect between what the best
medical science recommends and the treatment they often receive."
©Copyright
2001. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or
redistributed. |