Medics call for action on child health crisis
Deprivation, not disease, is
killing world's children, warn reports.
27 June 2003
TOM CLARKE
 |
|
More money is needed
to pay for
vaccinations. |
|
© WHO |
|
|
The health of the world's children is in an "abysmal
state", say medical experts in a series of reports, the
first of which is published today. Only cash and
coordinated effort can end the crisis, they warn.
Each year, 10.8 million under-fives die. More than
60% of these infants are killed by preventable illnesses
such as diarrhoea and pneumonia, the reports reveal1-5.
"We could save 6 million children every year by doing
what we know how to do," says Jennifer Bryce, a child
health specialist at the World Health Organization (WHO)
in Geneva, Switzerland - namely, tackling malnutrition
and sanitation, and giving basic treatment for
respiratory diseases and diarrhoea.
Bryce coordinated the effort, which presents the
first comprehensive analysis of child survival data for
two decades. The reports highlight a worsening trend in
child health. Worldwide child mortality fell by about
2.5% each year between 1960 and 1990. This slowed to
1.1% between 1990 and 2001. "Focus has drifted away from
child survival," says child health epidemiologist Saul
Morris of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine.
Donations to child health care are also down. At $1.9
billion, this year's US overseas health aid budget is
larger than ever, but funds earmarked for child survival
are just $326 million, their lowest since 1995.
All this despite the United Nations' resolution in
2000 that made a 60% reduction in child mortality by
2015 one of its eight Millennium Development Goals.
The international community must find $7.5 billion a
year, the analysis concludes. This money will pay for
vaccinations against diseases such as measles and
diphtheria, treating diarrhoea pneumonia and malaria,
raising barriers to and HIV and improving nutrition.
A new strategy is needed, too, argue the reports.
Global public-health money is almost always allocated to
a specific disease or problem -tuberculosis or improved
sanitation, for example. This compartmentalization can
mean that resources are not maximized to benefit
children, often those at greatest risk.
Recent initiatives, such as The Global Fund to Fight
AIDS, Tuberculosis & Malaria, are well-intentioned, says
Bryce. But they may be distracting attention and
resources needed to improve the health of children as a
whole.
She hopes that the WHO, which comes under new
leadership in July, and the United Nations' children's
fund UNICEF, will take the lead in finding the money and
the strategy to improve child survival.
Epidemiologist Steve Luby of the US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention in Altlanta, Georgia,
agrees. "If political rhetoric is going to mean anything
you have to take concrete steps," he says. "This work
shows they are achievable and also which steps you must
take." |