News extra
Enforced humour annoys patients
Roger Dobson Abergavenny
Researchers investigating the working of a special "humour ward" in a
hospital caution that a regime of a joke a day for each patient, cartoons on the
doors, and jokes on the walls may not be to every patients liking.
They say that some patients, especially those in pain, are not amused by
enforced humour.
"Often humour attempts are not welcome by patients, especially when they are
in pain, in low spirits, or are feeling depressed," said the team (Health
Communication 2003:15;319-30).
In the study the researchers, who found that real humour was more likely to
be found in spontaneous interactions than in the contrived humour introduced by
experts, looked at the effects of the humour regimen in a 20 bed rehabilitation
unit, the Medical Institute for Recovery Through Humor (MIRTH), in an Oklahoma
City hospital.
The purpose of the now closed unit was to promote rehabilitation through the
use of humour. "MIRTH conveyed an overt humour identity through its decorations,
wall hangings, and personnel attire. Walking into the unit, one saw cartoons,
pictures of animals, humorous sayings, jokes and puns, posters of popular
mid-20th century comedy characters like Lucille Ball and the Marx Brothers, and
stuffed animals," said the authors.
And there was more. The door to each patients room was decorated with a
picture of a cartoon character or a block of quotations. Each of the sections of
wall between the doors had a theme, such as having a border of yellow "smiley"
faces and being filled with cartoons, jokes, and quotations. Another section
portrayed Kermit the Frog and Miss Piggy. Staff in the unit planned and
delivered, where appropriate, a joke of the day for each patient.
"The findings suggest that humour in the activity sessions was mainly a
by-product of more predominant effects, such as patients positive attitude and
happiness," said the authors.
"Our observations of the activity sessions and the patient-provider
interactions suggest that humour was more often embedded in the emergent
communication rather than in the imposed messages designed to elicit laughter or
amusement."
They concluded, "Given that humour in health contexts can be as detrimental
to patients as it is efficacious, we offer a final caveat. Though our
observations of a MIRTH unit suggest that staff and patient use of humour were
beneficial for these particular rehab patients, we do not advocate that
providers impose humour on all their patient interactions. Individual
differences dictate that humour, as with all communication behaviours, must be
employed sensitively and rhetorically."