|
By LAURAN NEERGAARD : AP Medical Writer
Jun 25, 2003 : 12:53 am ET
WASHINGTON -- Scientists have discovered that
a drug that shrinks enlarged prostates and fights baldness also cuts
men's chances of getting prostate cancer, the first success in a
long quest to prevent the No. 2 cancer killer of men.
But not every man will want to use the drug,
called finasteride: Sexual side effects aside, it may actually
increase aggressive tumors in some.
Finasteride is sold under the brand name
Proscar to treat the benign prostate enlargement so common with
aging and, in a much lower dose, as Propecia to fight baldness.
"Finasteride may not be right for all men,"
cautioned Dr. Leslie Ford of the National Cancer Institute, which
paid for the research. Men and their doctors should "take the time
to review this data and make informed choices."
Prostate cancer strikes 220,000 U.S. men
annually and kills almost 29,000; so even limited use of Proscar
promises "extraordinary public health potential," said Dr. Ian
Thompson of the University of Texas Health Sciences Center in San
Antonio, who led the research.
Proscar alters levels of a male hormone, the
testosterone relative DHT. Men with naturally low levels of DHT have
less prostate cancer -- and black Americans, who have a very high
risk of prostate cancer, have high DHT levels.
Researchers tested whether reducing DHT could
prevent cancer. The results: Men who took Proscar daily for seven
years had 25 percent fewer prostate cancers than men given a dummy
pill.
The study of 18,000 older men, originally
scheduled to run for another year, was abruptly stopped this month,
and the New England Journal of Medicine rushed the results onto its
Web site Tuesday.
"This trial proves prostate cancer, at least
in part, is preventable," said Dr. Peter Greenwald, NCI's cancer
prevention chief, who participated in the study himself and so far
is cancer-free. "It's a huge step forward."
But some troubling findings have critics
questioning just how often Proscar should be used:
--Men who developed prostate cancer while
taking Proscar were more likely to have tumors that appear to be
aggressive, what doctors term "high grade." Some 6.4 percent of
Proscar patients were diagnosed with high-grade tumors, compared
with 5.1 percent of men given dummy pills.
No one knows if Proscar alters the prostate's
hormone environment in a way that favors growth of more aggressive
tumors or if that was a fluke. Some hormonal treatments can make
prostate cancer cells initially appear more aggressive than they
are. Researchers are tracking how those men fare.
--Another quirk questions the true value of
Proscar's benefit. Researchers diagnosed prostate cancer in four
times more placebo patients than expected, partly because every
study participant got a prostate biopsy even if blood tests for
cancer-signaling PSA were normal. Those biopsies often found small,
early-stage tumors -- and in the real world, wouldn't have been
done.
"It looks like Proscar prevented little tiny,
insignificant cancers, but did nothing for high-grade cancers or
maybe even allowed them to become more common," said Dr. Peter
Scardino of New York's Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, who
wrote a cautionary editorial accompanying the research. "That
doesn't sound like a very good trade-off to me."
The study didn't test whether taking Proscar
helped men live longer, added Dr. Herman Kattlove of the American
Cancer Society, who predicted a huge debate about its usefulness.
"If it were free of side effects, it would be
another story," he said, citing impotence and loss of libido that
were more common among Proscar users. "If it's not going to save
your life, and it's just going to ruin your sex life, I won't."
How effective is Proscar? Track 1,000 men
starting at age 63, and 60 will get prostate cancer by age 70.
Eighteen of those cancers will be high-grade. Give those 1,000 men
Proscar every day, and only 45 would get prostate cancer -- but 22
of them would be high-grade, the NCI estimated.
Proscar's other effects: Sexual problems were
5 percent to 13 percent more common among Proscar users. However,
Proscar users had slightly fewer of the urinary problems that often
accompany aging.
"There are very few prevention strategies
that are not trade-offs," said Thompson, urging men to weigh their
individual cancer risk and side-effect tolerance.
Proscar aside, the massive study could shed
much-needed new light on other problems with prostate cancer. Today,
there's no good way to predict who needs aggressive therapy and who
has a slow-growing, unthreatening tumor. Scientists will use blood,
biopsy and even some DNA samples given by study participants in
hopes of solving that dilemma.
|