Steroids Trigger A 'Domino Effect' On Genes At Different
Points In Time, Studies Find
BUFFALO, N.Y. -- Corticosteroids, drugs that simultaneously deliver powerful
therapeutic effects and potentially severe adverse effects, cause a remarkably
complex "domino effect" of genomic changes, according to a landmark paper by
University at Buffalo pharmaceutical scientists.
The paper was published June 13 online in the Journal of Pharmacology and
Experimental Therapeutics (JPET).
By helping researchers unravel the complex ways in which steroids act in the
body, the research will begin to provide insights into ways to develop more
individualized dosing for patients.
The UB research is the first to reveal the huge spectrum of genomic changes
triggered in vivo by corticosteroids, or for that matter, any class of drugs.
"By giving us a more complete understanding of the changes that drugs cause
in genes, this work provides us with the tools we need to better control those
changes," said William J. Jusko, Ph.D., professor and chair of the Department of
Pharmaceutical Sciences in the UB School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
and co-author on the paper.
"In the future, researchers will be able to use this kind of information to
tailor dosing regimens for patients so as to maximize positive effects and
reduce adverse ones," he said.
What sets the work of the UB researchers apart from others is that they study
pharmacodynamics, the time course of drug effects, on multiple genes and gene
products.
"In our research, we try to look at the time frame of both positive and
negative effects," said Richard R. Almon, Ph.D., professor of biological
sciences in the UB College of Arts and Sciences, co-author and Jusko's partner
in the work for more than a decade. "If we can find ways to increase the former
and reduce the latter, then we can design better dosing regimens."
Because of the severity of the side effects caused by steroids, more
individualized dosing regimens are sorely needed, particularly for transplant
patients, who usually have to take steroids for their lifetime to suppress their
immune systems so that the transplanted organ is not rejected. Corticosteroids
also are prescribed for patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, asthma,
lupus and inflammatory bowel disease.
"When corticosteroids are prescribed for patients, many of them develop type
2 diabetes, muscle atrophy, atherosclerosis and osteoporosis," said Almon.
"We don't yet know how to turn up the drugs' positive effects and turn down
the others," he said, adding that right now, corticosteroids are prescribed --
as are most drugs -- for an individual who is assumed to be average in all
respects.
"No one is average in all variables," he said.
The researchers focused on genomic changes in the livers of lab rats that had
been administered methylprednisolone.
"We looked first at the liver because that's the big factory of metabolic
functions," said Almon. "It probably expresses more genes than any other
tissue."
Until now, researchers studying genomic effects of pharmaceuticals have only
looked at a single point in time. In fact, the UB paper is a follow-up to a
pilot study the UB team published last year in the Journal of Pharmacokinetics
and Pharmacodynamics in which the researchers did exactly that.
"In that paper, we studied effects at only one time value, focusing on what
we thought was an optimum time following dosing of the drug," said Jusko.
But the UB team's newest results on genomic changes in the liver caused by
steroids demonstrate that these changes are highly time-dependent.
"In order to understand what's happening after administration of any drug, it
turns out that you have to look at the full genomic time profile," said Jusko.
"Looking at only one point in time, we've found, can be severely misleading."
In examining 8,000 genes at 17 different time points lasting 72 hours, the UB
researchers discovered that 200 genes undergo significant changes as a result of
what they call the "domino effect" triggered by steroids.
Of those changes, the researchers identified six distinct patterns, or
profiles, with clusters of genes showing similar increases, decreases and mixed
changes in the production of messenger RNA.
"These detailed studies provide more extensive information on what's
happening," said Jusko. "To do a proper assessment of the importance of gene
changes, you have to study messenger RNA that each gene controls and the
proteins or enzymes that those proteins, in turn, control. The genes we looked
at took 72 hours to undergo the full range of genomic changes in response to
steroids."
He added that the amount of time needed to see a complete genomic profile
probably will differ with each drug.
"We think this is the first publication showing such complicated
time-dependent genomic changes," said Jusko, "yet the genes have consistency in
obeying some basic biological rules."
To do the experiments, Almon uses gene microarray technology to acquire
massive amounts of data on changes in gene expression that result from dosing
rats. He then looks for ways to "connect the dots," as he puts it, in all the
biochemical pathways in which these genomic changes are involved. Jusko then
puts these data into rational mathematical models to predict the cascade of
biological events produced by the drug.
"We are looking for rational, temporal patterns of gene expression on a grand
scale, to see how they all fit together," said Almon.
That kind of information may turn out to be useful for drug companies, he
explained, who could use it to identify potential drug targets.
"If we can identify all the genetic variations and understand how things
cascade together, it will allow us to move toward pharmacogenomics, where dosing
and eventually, medicines, are developed based on genetic variations," said
Almon.
Jusko has been continuously funded for more than 25 years by the National
Institutes of Health to study pharmacodynamics, the time-course of drug effects
on the body.
Jusko and his colleagues at UB recently received additional NIH funding for
what will be a complicated extension of this research -- the bioinformatics
piece -- in which they will expand the number of tissues examined and begin to
connect the diverse genomic responses to what is already known about various
biochemical pathways in the body.
Other co-authors on the JPET paper include Debra C. DuBois, Ph.D., UB
research associate professor of biological sciences, Jin Y. Jin, a doctoral
candidate in the UB Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, and Keri E. Peterson
and Dietrich A. Stephan of the Research Center for Genetic Medicine at
Children's National Medical Research Center, Washington, D.C.
Editor's Note: The original news release can be found
here.
This story has been adapted from a news release issued by University At
Buffalo.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"