Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7403/1348-b

BMJ Intended for Health Professionals in the US
 

Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ  2003;326:1348 (21 June)
 

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Mayor, S.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Drugs: cardiovascular system
Diabetes

News

Statins cut cardiovascular events by a quarter in people with diabetes

Susan Mayor

London

Statin treatment reduces major coronary events, revascularisations, and stroke by nearly a quarter in people with diabetes regardless of whether they have occlusive arterial disease or raised cholesterol. This was the finding from a major study published last week.


 

Professor Rory Collins

The Medical Research Council/British Heart Foundation heart protection study randomly allocated 5973 UK adults (aged 40-80 years) with a history of diabetes—90% with type 2 diabetes and 10% with type 1—to 40 mg simvastatin daily or a matching placebo for five years. Results showed that the combined end point of first major coronary event, stroke, and revascularisation was reduced by 22% (95% confidence interval 13% to 30%) in patients treated with simvastatin compared with those given placebo.

A total of 601 (20.2%) first events occurred in the simvastatin group, 748 (25.1%) in the placebo group (P<0.0001). The researchers, the Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group, argued that as compliance was not 100% in the trial, full compliance with the daily statin regimen would probably reduce major vascular events by even more than seen in the study—by about a third, they estimated ( Lancet 2003;361: 2005-16).

Reductions in cardiovascular events with simvastatin were similar regardless of whether patients had raised cholesterol levels at baseline. Nearly half (2426 patients) of the study group had pretreatment LDL (low density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels below 3.0 mmol/l. Statin treatment reduced events in this group by 27% (13% to 40%; P=0.0007). The 2912 patients without diagnosed occlusive arterial disease also shared similar risk reduction, of 33% (17% to 45%; P=0.0003).

Lead researcher Rory Collins, professor of medicine and epidemiology at the clinical trials service unit and epidemioglogical studies unit at the Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, said: "The results provide direct evidence that cholesterol lowering therapy is beneficial for people with diabetes even if they do not already have manifest coronary disease or high cholesterol concentrations."

He argued that his team supported renewed emphasis on the control of macrovascular complications of diabetes other than hyperglycaemia: "The study showed that the benefits of cholesterol lowering therapy were additional to those of other cardioprotective treatments."


Rapid responses:

Read all Rapid responses

Relative risk and NNT
Nicholas J Devine
bmj.com, 22 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Re: NNTs
Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 23 Jun 2003 [Full text]
NNT and costs
douglas n salmon
bmj.com, 24 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Seeing what you want to see
Philipp Conradi, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Jun 2003 [Full text]
Re: NNTs and costs
Matthew L Grove
bmj.com, 25 Jun 2003 [Full text]
NNTs, costs, and preventing a quarter of Events
L S Lewis
bmj.com, 25 Jun 2003 [Full text]
More on costs
douglas n salmon
bmj.com, 27 Jun 2003 [Full text]



 

PDF of this article
Email this article to a friend
Respond to this article
Read responses to this article
PubMed citation
Related articles in PubMed
Download to Citation Manager
Search Medline for articles by:
Mayor, S.
Alert me when:
New articles cite this article
 
Collections under which this article appears:
Drugs: cardiovascular system
Diabetes


 

 


Home Help Search/Archive Feedback Table of Contents

BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics Online
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

 

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.