Thursday, June 19, 2003 Posted: 10:28 AM EDT (1428
GMT)
Story Tools
ON CNN TV
Is
it a bad mood or depression?
Also: Childhood obesity on the
rise.
Send questions to Weekend House
Call and watch CNN at 8:30
a.m. EST Saturday and Sunday.
BOSTON, Massachusetts (AP) --An enhanced type of MRI can detect much smaller
tumors than ever before -- some tinier than a pea -- in an advance that could
open a new age in diagnosing cancer without surgery, researchers say.
The experimental technique examines the lymph nodes for signs of spreading
cancer.
Doctors already routinely use MRIs to check the lymph nodes to see whether
cancer that originated somewhere else in the body -- say, in the breast or the
prostate gland -- is spreading. But the enhanced technique proved superior to
conventional MRIs when tested with cancer that had spread from the prostate.
And the leader of the research, Dr. Mukesh Harisinghani, said his team has
also had preliminary success using the approach to detect the spread of breast,
testicular, bladder and kidney cancer.
In the prostate study, the technique found 63 cancerous lymph nodes in 33
patients. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging, or MRI, would have missed 71
percent of the nodes, and the spreading cancer would have gone undetected in
nine patients.
"Even if it only works this well for prostate cancer, it's a significant
advance," said Dr. Jeffrey Brown, a radiologist at Washington University in St.
Louis.
Earlier detection of spreading prostate cancer would allow more aggressive
treatment sooner, help doctors track the response, and spare some patients
unnecessary removal of the prostate gland or lymph nodes. About 200,000 prostate
cancer cases are diagnosed each year, and 32,000 people die from it.
The Food and Drug Administration is considering whether to approve the new
technique. It is unclear when the FDA might decide.
Dr. Samuel Wickline, who studies imaging at Washington University, said this
method and others like it will eventually "allow us to diagnose things that you
can't even see with any imaging" now in use.
Nanoparticle detecting
The study, funded partly by the National Cancer Institute, was carried out by
Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and University Medical Center in
Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The findings appear in Thursday's New England Journal
of Medicine.
The method relies on minuscule magnetic particles, known as nanoparticles, to
enhance an MRI. Acting like a television's contrast dial, the injected particles
collect in the immune system's lymph nodes and create a clearer separation
between dark and light areas in the image.
Imaging systems have never reliably shown tumors this small before anywhere
in the body. Up to now, the smallest tumors detectable by MRI have been about
four-tenths of an inch -- the size of a fingernail.
Conventional MRI uses a magnetic field, which allows doctors to see enough
only to gauge the size of lymph nodes. Nodes bigger than four-tenths of an inch
are generally considered cancerous; however, they are not always cancerous,
while some smaller nodes are. The new technique shows detail within the nodes
that reveals cancer's presence.
The researchers gave patients an imaging agent known as lymphotropic
superparamagnetic nanoparticles, which are specks of iron oxide less than a
billionth of an inch across. Normally, the liver sucks up imaging agents before
they reach the lymph nodes, but these particles are so small, they seep into the
lymph system.
The technique appeared to work in cancerous lymph nodes from two-tenths to
four-tenths of an inch, which would normally go unnoticed with regular MRI. It
detected 96 percent of cancerous nodes that size, compared with a detection rate
of 29 percent for regular MRI, and it found 41 percent of cancerous nodes
smaller than two-tenths of an inch, which are invisible to conventional MRI.
When spreading cancer has already reached the lymph nodes, doctors typically
order radiation or hormonal treatments.
The researchers did not report any major side effects from the imaging agent.
"I would anticipate that it's going to get approved, and I would anticipate
that it's going to be a big seller," said Dr. Otis Brawley, a cancer specialist
at Emory University in Atlanta.
Copyright 2003 The
Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"