Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A14F9395C0C748DDDAF0894DB404482

National Desk | June 17, 2003, Tuesday
JUSTICES RESTRICT FORCED MEDICATION PRECEDING A TRIAL

By LINDA GREENHOUSE (NYT) 1196 words
Late Edition - Final , Section A , Page 1 , Column 6

ABSTRACT - Supreme Court votes, 6-to-3, to place strict limits on government's ability to medicate mentally ill defendants forcibly to make them competent to stand trial; finds use of antipsychotic drugs must be in defendant's best medical interest and 'substantially unlikely' to cause side effects that would compromise fairness of trial; court holds government's 'important' interest in bringing defendant to trial must be unattainable by alternative, less intrusive means; Justice Stephen G Breyer, writing for majority, says circumstances permitting involuntary administration of antipsychotic drugs 'may be rare' whether defendant has been accused of violent or, as in this case, nonviolent crime; decision overturns ruling by federal appeals court in St Louis authorizing forced medication of Dr Charles T Sell, dentist charged with Medicaid fraud and mail fraud; he has been found incompetent and has refused medication; legal standoff has kept him confined without trial for more than four years (L) The Supreme Court placed strict limits today on the government's ability to medicate mentally ill defendants forcibly to make them competent to stand trial.

The use of antipsychotic drugs must be in the defendant's best medical interest and ''substantially unlikely'' to cause side effects that would compromise the fairness of the trial, the court said in a 6-to-3 decision by Justice Stephen G. Breyer. Additionally, the court held, the government's ''important'' interest in bringing the defendant to trial must be unattainable by alternative, less intrusive means.



 

PURCHASING FROM NYTIMES.COM IS QUICK AND SECURE.
To read the complete article, simply click on one of the BUY NOW buttons below.

You can buy this single article or, for even greater value, you can purchase this article as part of a multi-pack. You'll then have the opportunity to buy additional articles now or in the future at significant savings!

 
Purchase Single Article -- $2.95  
Purchase as part of Article 4-Pack -- $7.95
($1.99/article - a 33% savings!)
Pack expires after 1 month
 
 
Purchase as part of Article 10-Pack -- $15.95
($1.60/ article - a 46% savings!)
Pack expires after 3 months
 
 
Purchase as part of Article 25-Pack -- $25.95
($1.05/ article - a 65% savings!)
Pack expires after 6 months
 
 

How multi-packs work: A multi-pack is an archive package that saves you money by allowing you to pre-purchase a set number of articles in bulk at a reduced price. You can then debit from your multi-pack and quickly access articles from the archive at your convenience over the lifetime of the multi-pack.

Once you purchase an article, you may view it as often as you like over the next 90 days. Archive articles do not include photos, charts or graphics

Click here to purchase article if you already own an archive article pack.


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Information

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.