National
Desk
| June 17, 2003, Tuesday
JUSTICES
RESTRICT FORCED MEDICATION PRECEDING A TRIAL
By LINDA GREENHOUSE (NYT) 1196
words
Late Edition - Final , Section A ,
Page 1 , Column 6
ABSTRACT
- Supreme Court votes, 6-to-3, to place
strict limits on government's ability to
medicate mentally ill defendants forcibly to
make them competent to stand trial; finds
use of antipsychotic drugs must be in
defendant's best medical interest and
'substantially unlikely' to cause side
effects that would compromise fairness of
trial; court holds government's 'important'
interest in bringing defendant to trial must
be unattainable by alternative, less
intrusive means; Justice Stephen G Breyer,
writing for majority, says circumstances
permitting involuntary administration of
antipsychotic drugs 'may be rare' whether
defendant has been accused of violent or, as
in this case, nonviolent crime; decision
overturns ruling by federal appeals court in
St Louis authorizing forced medication of Dr
Charles T Sell, dentist charged with
Medicaid fraud and mail fraud; he has been
found incompetent and has refused
medication; legal standoff has kept him
confined without trial for more than four
years (L) The Supreme Court placed strict
limits today on the government's ability to
medicate mentally ill defendants forcibly to
make them competent to stand trial.
The use of antipsychotic drugs must be in
the defendant's best medical interest and
''substantially unlikely'' to cause side
effects that would compromise the fairness
of the trial, the court said in a 6-to-3
decision by Justice Stephen G. Breyer.
Additionally, the court held, the
government's ''important'' interest in
bringing the defendant to trial must be
unattainable by alternative, less intrusive
means.
PURCHASING
FROM NYTIMES.COM IS QUICK AND
SECURE.
To read the complete article,
simply click on one of the BUY
NOW buttons below.
You can buy
this single article or, for even
greater value, you can purchase
this article as part of a
multi-pack. You'll then have the
opportunity to buy additional
articles now or in the future at
significant savings!
Purchase
Single Article -- $2.95
Purchase as part of Article
4-Pack -- $7.95 ($1.99/article - a 33%
savings!)
Pack expires after 1 month
Purchase as part of Article
10-Pack -- $15.95 ($1.60/ article - a 46%
savings!)
Pack expires after 3 months
Purchase as part of Article
25-Pack -- $25.95 ($1.05/ article - a 65%
savings!)
Pack expires after 6 months
How multi-packs work: A
multi-pack is an archive package that saves
you money by allowing you to pre-purchase a
set number of articles in bulk at a reduced
price. You can then debit from your
multi-pack and quickly access articles from
the archive at your convenience over the
lifetime of the multi-pack.
Once you purchase an
article, you may view it as often as you
like over the next 90 days. Archive articles
do not include photos, charts or graphics
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"