Nicholas Pyke
Monday June 16, 2003
The Guardian
A mother who was told last week that her daughter must have the
controversial combined MMR vaccine against her wishes is seeking
urgent legal advice to try to block the move, it emerged yesterday.
The four-year-old is one of two girls who were ordered by a high
court judge to have the jab for measles, mumps and rubella in a
ruling on Friday. But according to a family friend, her mother is
now seeking legal advice to stop the injection being administered.
Many parents fear the MMR vaccine could be linked to autism even
though most experts say there is no evidence of a link. National
take-up rates have dropped because of the concerns.
Neither the mother nor her daughter can be named for legal
reasons, but Nick Skeens, a family friend who is helping them fight
the case, said they were urgently seeking advice. "The judgment came
through without us being informed. It took us all by surprise."
The cases, which were heard separately, were brought by the
fathers of the girls. They want the children to have the protection
of MMR injections.
"It's outrageous that, in a free society, a judge could make such
a decision," said the mother of the four-year-old. "To date,
vaccination has not been compulsory in Britain. This effectively
means that any parent, indeed anybody, can launch a complaint
against you, saying they don't like your beliefs - and want your
child protected from your beliefs."
The girls, aged four and 10, lived with their mothers, who felt
the combined vaccinations involved unacceptable risks.
The judge, Mr Justice Sumner, said the benefits of having the MMR
jab outweighed the risks. "Recognising the anxieties of the mothers
- the children's best interests are served by receiving a programme
of immunisations."
He accepted the mothers had taken a stand on what they felt was
best for their daughters. The fathers had acknowledged the risks but
said their views were supported by medical research.