Supreme Court Says
Veterans Can Sue for Agent Orange Caused Illness (Beyond Pesticides, Jun 11, 2003) In a deadlocked 4-4 decision
June 9, 2003, Dow Chemical Co. v. Stephenson, No. 02-271, the Supreme
Court affirmed a lower court decision to hear a case brought by Vietnam Veterans
suffering the effects of Agent Orange exposure, who believe they were not
adequately represented by a class action lawsuit settlement in 1985. Agent
Orange was a 50-50 mixture of the herbicides 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T, used to
defoliate the Vietnam jungle canopy. 2,4,5-T was banned for use in the U.S., but
2,4-D continues to be widely used on home lawns and in agriculture. The
tie-vote, which automatically upholds a lower court ruling of the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 2nd Circuit (New York), gives veteran Daniel Stephenson the
right to argue against the manufacturer Dow Chemical Company that compensation
for his fatal form of cancer, diagnosed in 1998, should not be limited by a 1985
settlement agreement between veterans and the manufacturers. The court also
ordered the lower court to hear a case brought by another veteran.
The 1985 settlement
agreement established a $180 million chemical company fund that was intended to
pay veteran claims for effects that ranged from birth defects to cancer. Funds
were exhausted in 1997, after the plaintiffs' disease was identified.
The veterans' attorney,
Gerson Smoger, said, "For the past nine years, we have been working to show that
the Agent Orange class action settlement cannot stand when the very victims of
Agent Orange are entitled to no compensation from it."
The insurance and business
lobby in Friend of the Court briefs urged the court not to open class action
settlements to further litigation, which could have major impact on an
acceptable litigation tool that is viewed as containing defendant liability.
Justice Paul Stevens recused himself from the case without explanation.
According to The Washington Post, Justice Stevens' son, a Vietnam
Veteran, died of cancer in 1996 at the age of 47
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"