News extra
India admits to unapproved drug formulations in market
New Delhi Ganapati Mudur
The Indian government has admitted that drug formulations unapproved by
Indias drug regulatory agency and not evaluated for effectiveness are
prescribed and sold across the country.
The unprecedented admission from the health ministry emerged at a court
hearing on nimesulide, a controversial non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
prescribed in India to treat fever and pain (BMJ 2003;326:70).
A group of lawyers in New Delhi called Social Jurist has filed a public
interest lawsuit challenging the use of nimesulide among children. The group had
also objected to unapproved combinations of nimesulide and other drugs,
prescribed for use in adults, as illegal.
Documents submitted to the court said dozens of unapproved formulations of
nimesulide combined with various other drugs, such as analgesics, anti-allergy
drugs, muscle relaxants, and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, remain
unapproved.
"We have some absurd, irrational combinations," said Dr Chandra Gulhati,
editor of the Monthly Index of Medical Specialities India, a journal that
tracks pharmaceutical products. "For instance, combinations of nimesulide and
diclofenacyou wont find such fixed dose combinations elsewhere," he said.
The drugs controller general of India has blamed states drug regulatory
officials for issuing manufacturing licences despite the absence of marketing
approvals from the central health ministry. In an affidavit the drugs
controllers office said it had asked a panel of experts to examine whether nine
of these fixed dose combinations could be justified.
The drugs controller said the expert panel had already declared that
combinations of nimesulide with paracetamol and with the muscle relaxants
tizanidine and chlorzoxazone (muscle relaxants) may "continue to be marketed."
The drugs controller also said that state authorities have been asked to adhere
strictly to drug rules and not give licences to unapproved combinations.
"We have a strange situation where the government concedes that formulations
out in the market for many years have yet to be evaluated," said Dr Gulhati.
Some doctors have long criticised Indias drug companies for flooding the market
with bad combinations.
Dr Gulhati said that over 70 unapproved combinations are sold under several
hundred brand names. These include combinations of antibiotics that could
contribute to the emergence of drug resistant organisms.
The drug controllers decision to allow the use of nimesulide in children has
also come under attack, with some paediatricians criticising the manner in which
the regulatory authorities evaluated the drug.
Explaining the decision to continue with the use of nimesulide in children,
the drugs controller provided statements from the Indian Academy of Pediatrics
and personal opinions of several practising doctors that there was no
justification to impose a ban on nimesulide.
But paediatricians allege that medical opinion is being influenced by drug
companies. Only Italy, India, and Brazil allow the use of nimesulide in
children.
"In the past, unscientific data generated by drug companies has been passed
off as studies that establish the safety of this drug," said Dr Sanjiv Lewin,
associate professor of paediatrics and clinical ethics at the St Johns Medical
College Hospital, Bangalore.
Last month one of Indias leading makers of nimesulide, Dr Reddyss
Laboratories, announced that it had stopped making four combinations of
nimesulide. The company explained its decision as part of rationalising its
nimesulide strategy.