: "Shaken Baby?"
Maybe Not: Adult vaccine guinea pigs talk
and walk at personal sacrifice
Roanoke, VA 24014
June 10, 2003
Adults avoiding
side effects of vaccines and experimental
drugs get press coverage and sympathy denied
helpless day-old infants. Some newborns lose
parents when adverse reactions appear and
Mommy is labeled with "Munchausen Syndrome
by Proxy" (MSP) and Daddy or live-in or
baby-sitter is accused of "Shaken Baby
Syndrome" (SBS).
Scientific explanations are too rarely
sought. Emotional suspicion repeated by
media helps convict and imprison innocents
while their children are reallocated to
others. (See:
http://www.expertclick.com/NewsReleaseWire/default.cfm?Action=ReleaseDetail&ID4215)
Often unsuspecting adopting strangers
receive financial incentives as do public
child-placing agencies arranging permanent
transfer away from all family members,
siblings and grandparents included. Effects
of mandated immunizations (sometimes 4-9 in
one shot to an undeveloped immune system)
are ignored as a possible cause of alleged
"abuse."
Most in media and the public concentrate on
results of reactions to shots, drugs, DNA
errors and combination factors without
closely checking available science for
causes of those same results. Suspicion and
prosecution speculation make more
interesting press.
By avoiding genetic research findings and
revelations of medical geneticists
concerning confusing signs and symptoms in
genuinely ill children (Example:
http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns99993794)
as well as in post-mortem autopsies, some
"practicing" doctors and adjunct health
personnel initiate "parent-ectomies" to
borrow an apt expression.
But, don't take our word for what can happen
to children at the end of a needle. Read
WorldNetDaily's Tuesday (June 9) feature
"Vaccines fueling autism epidemic?," a
report on "U.S. Infants exposed to mercury
beyond EPA, FDA limits" at:
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=32988
Informed Consent?
Healthy adults today risk separation from
military service and censure in
health-related work as nurses, emergency
technicians, and related occupations and
volunteer positions for questioning herd
inoculations for themselves. They have seen
and learned of consequences of too readily
accepting even single vaccines ordered to
continue in their work.
A story about fatal effects of combination
shots in United Kingdom's Sunday Mirror too
vividly and dramatically illustrates what
should, but may not yet be, the truly worst
case scenario. Read:
http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/page.cfm?objectid=13044404&method=full&siteid=106694&headline=THE%20SUICIDE%20SQUADDIES
Groggy mothers immediately after delivery
are no more a match for a poised
"protective" needle strike on and for their
just-born infant/s than are the totally
helpless babies themselves.
So, who removes a veil of deliberate
ignorance from child protective services
intake and investigation efforts when
chemicals react from within and are the
proximate and underlying causes of MSP and
SBS mistaken, mischievous, or malicious
child abuse reports?
Science Totally Lacking
Who orders "the court" to demand that
accepted scientific methodology supports Roy
Meadow's emotive motivation theory he coined
"Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy"? When and by
whom was his alleged research replicated and
peer reviewed?
(Hint: His freelance research never will be
repeated because saltloading a sick infant
repeatedly admitted with high chloride would
trigger prosecution of any other person, not
knighthood as Roy Meadow received. Read
carefully:
http://web.tiscali.it/humanrights/articles/meadow77.html
Which court will be the first to declare
that Laws of Nature (physics, to be precise)
do not support the "Shaken Baby" theory as
described, accepted, and prosecuted?
(Hint: NCADRC's 11th International
Conference featured four presenters from
varied disciplines. Using different
approaches they passed public and peer
review in proving SBS cannot be what many
choose to believe it is.)
If SBS is not what people think it is, if
laws of nature show its signs cannot occur
from outside force, what creates retinal
hemorrhages? Could something assault a
baby's brain--as chemical changes clearly
occur in brains of previously immune-strong
adults--from the inside? Perhaps something
injected into the bloodstream?
If not SBS, What?
Scientists throughout the world, when not
funded by drug manufacturing firms or if
proving the lack of science behind popular
much prosecuted theories, find their
research manuscripts unwelcome in major
journals funded by vaccine producers. Thus,
a statement that "There is no science
supporting..." may be a true statement only
because peer review and publication are
prevented.
If their work connects vaccines and
adjuvants (materials vaccines are delivered
in) as igniting causation factors that
result in serious health problems or deaths,
they may find themselves personally and
professionally as welcome as fire ants at a
preschool picnic in formerly collegial
venues.
Still, in the absence of solid
science--apparently known to be wholly
lacking with regard to vaccine safety for
all--the "dust bin" or "wastebasket" faux
diagnoses are no more than prejudicial
labels: "Munch" moms and alleged SBS
baby-sitters and "violent" male caretakers.
Labels shared by prosecutors with media
usually create sufficient emotion to convict
all but the many self-servingly sitting on
the whole truth of vaccine and adjuvant
involvement.
Vaccines, the materials they are delivered
in, the immediate and genetic health of
newborns and infants (as well as reluctant
or naive healthy adults), accumulation of
materials known dangerous to humans (such as
mercury), and factors including
environmental, may be root causes of
California's stunning autism rate rise
currently in the news.
Shawna's Bill
Cheap shot labeling of mothers, fathers, and
caretakers deflects attention from
"practicing" professionals who gave or
ordered the shots, pills, or failed to
preview genetic factors that could explain
infant deaths or new disabilities in
children of nonrandom parents or in a
previously vibrant military serviceperson or
in a now crippled but "emergency-prepared"
cooperative nurse.
When media demands and understands
connections between a sick or dead baby (or
adult, likely including NBC's admired David
Bloom) and immunization and medication
histories, and when legislators require all
autopsies of uncertain child deaths to
include medical genetics and drug screens,
remaining mysteries of SIDS may be solved.
It is past time for cruel labeling of
innocent and grieving MSP moms and SBS
caretakers, as well as belittling of
cautious military and health care personnel,
who shun risky shots, to cease.
When the connections are made and the light
dawns, taxpayers and all who care about
children and health worldwide as well as
whole truth and family justice will insist
on enacting "Shawna's Bill." (See:
http://www.expertclick.com/NewsReleaseWire/default.cfm?Action=ReleaseDetail&ID4172
In the meantime, confused professionals and
media determined to learn where science
really trumps suspicion may contact
researchers with information on the origins
of MSP and revelations on SBS signs through
NCADRC.
Barbara Bryan
Kimberly Hart
(ncadrc@aol.com)
Executive Director
National Child Abuse Defense & Resource
Center
P.O. Box 638
Holland, OH 43528
Phone : 419-865-0513
Fax : 419-865-0526
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
Bottom
Back
Next
Top 
Ask a question with NewsTipSM.