Return to Vaccination News Home Page
Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter
View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)
Search This Site using keywords
http://www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews/pick_03/prsc0616.htm
|
By Damon Adams, AMNews staff. June 16, 2003.
New studies have a message for doctors who prescribe pain medication: Don't fear discipline from medical boards or criminal prosecution if you follow pain guidelines and appropriately prescribe medications.
Three studies concerning medical boards, prosecution and pain-treatment guidelines are published in the Spring 2003 issue of the peer-reviewed Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
A survey of 38 medical boards found boards were abandoning drug quantity as a marker of questionable practice and assessing instead whether a doctor properly evaluated a patient and followed the board's pain-treatment guidelines. A second study of county prosecutors in Oregon, Maryland, Washington and Connecticut found the likelihood of investigation or prosecution "extremely low."
A third study said more boards had adopted pain-management guidelines but recommended that they take greater steps to train investigators about pain standards and circulate guidelines to physicians.
"Boards are becoming more sophisticated. They're trying to discern between drug diversion and appropriate prescribing for pain. Doctors should not be fearful if they're trying to legitimately treat pain and follow the guidelines established by the state board," said Diane E. Hoffmann, co-author of the study of 38 boards and director of the Law and Health Care Program at the University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore.
|
Medical boards are more likely to look into
overprescribing of drugs than undertreatment of
pain.
|
Doctors who specialize in pain treatment said the studies would not reduce physician fears or purge images of armed drug enforcement agents sweeping into a doctor's office.
"They hear that stuff and they are terrified, particularly if they know the doctor," said Joel Hochman, MD, a Houston psychiatrist and executive director of the National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain. "They're coming in with SWAT teams and prosecuting these doctors with a whole litany of trumped-up criminal charges."
L. Jean Dunegan, MD, said boards are making progress in accurately addressing pain treatment but much work still needs to be done.
"There is no question that fear often keeps many of the average physicians afraid to prescribe," said Dr. Dunegan, director of the Hillsdale (Mich.) Pain Center. "All we need to see is one public [arrest], and there but for one prescription go I."
Hoffmann's survey was based on the perceptions of board officials rather than actual numbers because most states don't track complaints based on opioid prescribing. Cases concerning opioid prescriptions typically are lumped by boards with other prescribing violations.
More than three in four boards said complaints, investigations and disciplinary actions stayed the same or increased from 1997 to 2001. Sixteen percent of the boards said disciplinary actions decreased during that time. Boards were more likely to look into overprescribing of drugs than undertreatment of pain.
|
88% of prosecutors said no doctors had been
charged in the past year for prescribing pain
medicine incorrectly.
|
Boards said greater public awareness of drug abuse was a key reason for the increase in complaints. But Hoffmann said boards had made strides in recognizing the need for adequate pain treatment, translating to improved attitudes and practices in recent years toward physicians' prescribing of opioids. "We found they are looking more closely at the facts and not relying on volume and duration [of drugs]. They're looking at the guidelines that many of them have established. Many are looking at documentation issues," she said.
In his survey of prosecutors, co-author Stephen J. Ziegler, PhD, found that 88% said no physicians had been prosecuted in the past year for prescribing violations.
"Doctors overestimate the risk of criminal investigation or prosecution stemming from the treatment of pain," said Dr. Ziegler, a political science professor at Washington State University in Pullman, Wash.
The Federation of State Medical Boards said disciplinary actions for prescribing violations, which include overprescribing for pain, have remained fairly stable over the past nine years. In 1994, boards took 403 actions against doctors for controlled substance violations, the federation said. In 2002, there were 362 actions for such violations.
Since the federation adopted model pain-treatment guidelines in 1998, more than 20 boards have formed policies based on the guidelines.
"When physicians follow those guidelines, it's extremely rare that they're going to get into trouble with the state medical board," said James Thompson, MD, chief executive officer of the Texas-based FSMB.
Medical board members agreed.
"If you practice good medicine, you're not going to lose your license," said Regina Benjamin, MD, a member of the Alabama State Board of Medical Examiners.
Dennis O'Neill, MD, chair of the Connecticut Medical Examining Board, added: "Nobody is pulling the trigger on these doctors precipitously. I don't think we're being overaggressive with physicians who are managing pain."
Still, Dr. Dunegan said doctors should proceed with caution, realizing that one board may approach the issue differently from another.
"That variability from state to state makes it very difficult," Dr. Dunegan said. "It's almost like a crapshoot that you're going to be in a state [where] you don't have to be afraid."
State medical boards were asked to estimate whether complaints, investigations and disciplinary actions for overprescribing opioids had increased, decreased or stayed the same from 1997-2001. Researchers concluded that boards were more concerned about overprescribing than about pain undertreatment.
Increased Decreased Stayed
the sameNo
opinionComplaints 14 (37%) 4 (11%) 17 (45%) 3 (8%) Investigations 15 (40%) 3 (8%) 17 (45%) 3 (8%) Disciplinary actions 14 (37%) 6 (16%) 15 (40%) 3 (8%)
Source: Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
"Achieving the Right Balance in Oversight of Physician Opioid Prescribing for Pain: The Role of State Medical Boards," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2003, in pdf (www.aslme.org/pub_jlme/31.1/hoffmann.pdf)
"Pain Relief, Prescription Drugs, and Prosecution: A Four-State Survey of Chief Prosecutors," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2003, in pdf (www.aslme.org/pub_jlme/31.1/ziegler.pdf)
National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain (www.paincare.org)
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.
Return to Vaccination News Home Page
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.