Physicians told not to fear
discipline for pain treatment
Medical boards are better
at evaluating pain-management cases, but pain specialists still warn
doctors to be careful to provide appropriate care.
By
Damon Adams, AMNews staff. June
16, 2003.
New studies have a message for doctors who prescribe pain
medication: Don't fear discipline from medical boards or criminal
prosecution if you follow pain guidelines and appropriately prescribe
medications.
Three studies concerning medical boards, prosecution and pain-treatment
guidelines are published in the Spring 2003 issue of the peer-reviewed
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.
A survey of 38 medical boards found boards were abandoning drug
quantity as a marker of questionable practice and assessing instead
whether a doctor properly evaluated a patient and followed the board's
pain-treatment guidelines. A second study of county prosecutors in Oregon,
Maryland, Washington and Connecticut found the likelihood of investigation
or prosecution "extremely low."
A third study said more boards had adopted pain-management guidelines
but recommended that they take greater steps to train investigators about
pain standards and circulate guidelines to physicians.
"Boards are becoming more sophisticated. They're trying to discern
between drug diversion and appropriate prescribing for pain. Doctors
should not be fearful if they're trying to legitimately treat pain and
follow the guidelines established by the state board," said Diane E.
Hoffmann, co-author of the study of 38 boards and director of the Law and
Health Care Program at the University of Maryland School of Law,
Baltimore.
|
Medical boards are more likely to look into
overprescribing of drugs than undertreatment of
pain.
|
Doctors who specialize in pain treatment said the studies would not
reduce physician fears or purge images of armed drug enforcement agents
sweeping into a doctor's office.
"They hear that stuff and they are terrified, particularly if they know
the doctor," said Joel Hochman, MD, a Houston psychiatrist and executive
director of the National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain. "They're
coming in with SWAT teams and prosecuting these doctors with a whole
litany of trumped-up criminal charges."
L. Jean Dunegan, MD, said boards are making progress in accurately
addressing pain treatment but much work still needs to be done.
"There is no question that fear often keeps many of the average
physicians afraid to prescribe," said Dr. Dunegan, director of the
Hillsdale (Mich.) Pain Center. "All we need to see is one public [arrest],
and there but for one prescription go I."
State board perceptions
Hoffmann's survey was based on the perceptions of board officials
rather than actual numbers because most states don't track complaints
based on opioid prescribing. Cases concerning opioid prescriptions
typically are lumped by boards with other prescribing violations.
More than three in four boards said complaints, investigations and
disciplinary actions stayed the same or increased from 1997 to 2001.
Sixteen percent of the boards said disciplinary actions decreased during
that time. Boards were more likely to look into overprescribing of drugs
than undertreatment of pain.
|
88% of prosecutors said no doctors had been
charged in the past year for prescribing pain
medicine incorrectly.
|
Boards said greater public awareness of drug abuse was a key reason for
the increase in complaints. But Hoffmann said boards had made strides in
recognizing the need for adequate pain treatment, translating to improved
attitudes and practices in recent years toward physicians' prescribing of
opioids. "We found they are looking more closely at the facts and not
relying on volume and duration [of drugs]. They're looking at the
guidelines that many of them have established. Many are looking at
documentation issues," she said.
In his survey of prosecutors, co-author Stephen J. Ziegler, PhD, found
that 88% said no physicians had been prosecuted in the past year for
prescribing violations.
"Doctors overestimate the risk of criminal investigation or prosecution
stemming from the treatment of pain," said Dr. Ziegler, a political
science professor at Washington State University in Pullman, Wash.
The Federation of State Medical Boards said disciplinary actions for
prescribing violations, which include overprescribing for pain, have
remained fairly stable over the past nine years. In 1994, boards took 403
actions against doctors for controlled substance violations, the
federation said. In 2002, there were 362 actions for such violations.
Since the federation adopted model pain-treatment guidelines in 1998,
more than 20 boards have formed policies based on the guidelines.
"When physicians follow those guidelines, it's extremely rare that
they're going to get into trouble with the state medical board," said
James Thompson, MD, chief executive officer of the Texas-based FSMB.
Medical board members agreed.
"If you practice good medicine, you're not going to lose your license,"
said Regina Benjamin, MD, a member of the Alabama State Board of Medical
Examiners.
Dennis O'Neill, MD, chair of the Connecticut Medical Examining Board,
added: "Nobody is pulling the trigger on these doctors precipitously. I
don't think we're being overaggressive with physicians who are managing
pain."
Still, Dr. Dunegan said doctors should proceed with caution, realizing
that one board may approach the issue differently from another.
"That variability from state to state makes it very difficult," Dr.
Dunegan said. "It's almost like a crapshoot that you're going to be in a
state [where] you don't have to be afraid."
Back to top.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Mixed messages from boards
State medical boards were asked to estimate whether complaints,
investigations and disciplinary actions for overprescribing opioids
had increased, decreased or stayed the same from 1997-2001.
Researchers concluded that boards were more concerned about
overprescribing than about pain undertreatment.
| |
Increased |
Decreased |
Stayed
the same |
No
opinion |
| Complaints |
14 (37%) |
4 (11%) |
17 (45%) |
3 (8%) |
| Investigations |
15 (40%) |
3 (8%) |
17 (45%) |
3 (8%) |
| Disciplinary actions |
14 (37%) |
6 (16%) |
15 (40%) |
3 (8%) |
Source: Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics
Back to top.
Weblink
"Achieving the Right Balance in Oversight of Physician Opioid
Prescribing for Pain: The Role of State Medical Boards," Journal
of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2003, in pdf (www.aslme.org/pub_jlme/31.1/hoffmann.pdf)
"Pain Relief, Prescription Drugs, and Prosecution: A Four-State
Survey of Chief Prosecutors," Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics,
2003, in pdf (www.aslme.org/pub_jlme/31.1/ziegler.pdf)
National Foundation for the Treatment of Pain (www.paincare.org)
Back to top.
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.