| TUESDAY, June 3 (HealthDayNews) --
Belt-positioning booster seats cut the risk of injury in
children aged 4 to 7 by almost 60 percent compared with
seat belts alone, new research shows.
In particular, booster seats appeared to sharply cut
the risk of injuries to the abdomen and spine.
"Besides providing the first evidence of an overall
benefit, this study demonstrated the virtual elimination
of 'seat belt syndrome' for children who used the
booster seat," says Dr. Dennis R. Durbin, lead author of
a study appearing in the June 4 issue of the Journal
of the American Medical Association and an attending
physician in the emergency department at the Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia. "We did not expect to see that
dramatic a result."
"We certainly stand behind any belt-positioning
booster," adds Stephanie Tombrello, executive director
of SafetyBeltSafe U.S.A. "We recently did a five-step
test event at a community event with 50 children ages 3
to 12, and only one of them passed the five-step test, a
12-year-old. Every other one needed to use the booster.
The boosters really make a big difference."
Booster seats elevate the child so the vehicle's lap
or shoulder belts fit him or her properly. The National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recommends
that children between the ages of 4 and 8 use a booster
seat, unless they are 57 inches tall.
So far, 18 states and the District of Columbia have
passed laws requiring booster seats for children over
the age of 4, reports Cathy Chase, director of state
affairs for Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety in
Washington, D.C. Other states are in the process of
upgrading their laws.
Durbin and his colleagues are hoping the study
results will spur legislators to act quickly and
decisively.
"We are certainly hoping that our results could be
used by legislators and by parents to set a new standard
for what is considered normal for how we protect
children in this age group in the car," Durbin says. "I
think parents often look to their state laws for
guidance and they figure if it's not the law it must not
be important. Over [age] 4, lots of parents are under
the mistaken impression that the child is big enough to
sit with a seat belt. We are hoping that our information
can be used both by parents and legislators and safety
advocates to get the word out there that there is a step
between the car seat and the seat belt."
The current study is part of the Partners for Child
Passenger Safety (PCPS) project, a collaboration between
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance and the
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Durbin's group had previously shown that children
aged 2 to 5 in different kinds of child restraints,
including booster seats, did better than when they wore
seat belts alone.
For the latest study, the authors collected data on
car crashes in 15 states that had involved children
between the ages of 4 and 7. The data came from State
Farm Insurance claim records and a telephone survey.
Ultimately, the researchers collected information on
3,616 crashes involving 4,243 children, which was then
extrapolated to represent 56,593 children in 48,257
crashes.
All of the vehicles were model year 1990 or newer; 53
percent were passenger cars, 20 percent were minivans;
18 percent sport-utility vehicles; 6 percent pickup
trucks, and 2 percent large passenger/cargo vans. This
was roughly equivalent to the distribution of vehicles
in general.
Injuries occurred among 1.81 percent of the children,
with the percentage higher (1.95 percent) for those in
seat belts and lower (0.77 percent) for those in
belt-positioning booster seats. The odds of injury were
59 percent lower for children in the 4-to-7-year age
bracket in belt-positioning boosters than in seat belts.
Furthermore, children in booster seats had no injuries
to the abdomen, neck, spine, back or lower extremities,
while children in seat belts alone had injuries in all
body regions. The effectiveness of the booster seats was
the same regardless of whether the children used both
the lap and shoulder portion of the seat belt or just
the lap portion.
Children in belt-positioning booster seats were also
more likely to sit in the back seats of vehicles, which
is safer than the front. "It would appear as though
parents who use boosters are really understanding how to
keep their kids safe," Durbin says. "Not only are they
using proper restraining, but they are using it in the
correct place in the car."
Although the study covers kids up only to age 7,
there's no reason to think that booster seats wouldn't
benefit many 8-year-olds as well. "We didn't have any
8-year-olds in the study that were using booster seats,
[but] we would certainly expect 8-year-olds to benefit,"
Durbin says.
That protection could extend to even older children,
Tombrello says. "Our experience is that in many cases
children can't sit properly until they're 10 or 12.
We're not suggesting that laws should specify age. The
important thing is that all people ride correctly."
And for the 4-to-7-year age bracket, riding correctly
should be easy. "This is a pretty simple one for
parents," Durbin points out. "The seats do not have to
be installed in the car. They're small, highly portable
and very affordable."
More information
For more on child passenger safety, visit the
American Academy of Pediatrics,
SafetyBeltSafe U.S.A.
or
Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety. |