Belt-Positioning Booster Seats and Reduction in Risk of Injury Among Children in Vehicle Crashes

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/289/21/2835

JAMA & ARCHIVES
JAMA
SEARCH THIS JOURNAL
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME CURRENT ISSUE PAST ISSUES COLLECTIONS CONTACT US HELP

 
Vol. 289 No. 21, June 4, 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Featured Link
 •  E-mail Alerts
Original Contribution
 Article Options
 • Full text
 • PDF
 • Send to a Friend
 • Related articles in this issue
 • Similar articles in this journal
 Literature Track
 • Add to File Drawer
 • Download to Citation Manager
 • PubMed citation
 • Articles in PubMed by
   •Durbin DR
   •Winston FK
 • Contact me when this article is cited
 Topic Collections
 • Injury Prevention & Control
 • Pediatrics
 • Pediatrics, Other
 • Collection E-mail Alerts


Belt-Positioning Booster Seats and Reduction in Risk of Injury Among Children in Vehicle Crashes

Dennis R. Durbin, MD, MSCE; Michael R. Elliott, PhD; Flaura K. Winston, MD, PhD
 

JAMA. 2003;289:2835-2840.

Context  Although more than a dozen states have ratified laws that require booster seats for children older than 4 years, most states continue to have child restraint laws that only cover children through age 4 years. Lack of booster seat effectiveness data may be a barrier to passage of stronger child restraint laws.

Objectives  To quantify the association of belt-positioning booster seats compared with seat belts alone and risk of injury among 4- to 7-year-old children and to assess patterns of injury among children in booster seats vs seat belts.

Design, Setting, and Population  Cross-sectional study of children aged 4 to 7 years in crashes of insured vehicles in 15 states, with data collected via insurance claims records and a telephone survey. A probability sample of 3616 crashes involving 4243 children, weighted to represent 56 593 children in 48 257 crashes was collected between December 1, 1998, and May 31, 2002.

Main Outcome Measure  Parent report of clinically significant injuries.

Results  Injuries occurred among 1.81% of all 4- to 7-year-olds, including 1.95% of those in seat belts and 0.77% of those in belt-positioning booster seats. The odds of injury, adjusting for child, driver, crash, and vehicle characteristics, were 59% lower for children aged 4 to 7 years in belt-positioning boosters than in seat belts (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.86). Children in belt-positioning booster seats had no injuries to the abdomen, neck/spine/back, or lower extremities, while children in seat belts alone had injuries to all body regions.

Conclusion  Belt-positioning booster seats were associated with added safety benefits compared with seat belts to children through age 7 years, including reduction of injuries classically associated with improper seat belt fit in children.


Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (Drs Durbin and Winston), and the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (Dr Elliott), Philadelphia.

RELATED ARTICLES IN JAMA

This Week in JAMA
JAMA. 2003;289:2759.
FULL TEXT  

HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | COLLECTIONS | CONTACT US | HELP
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.