Pediatric Exposure and Potential Toxicity of Phthalate Plasticizers

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/111/6/1467

Pediatrics www.pedialink.org
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Browse & Search]


Full Text of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Email this article to a friend
Similar articles found in:
Pediatrics Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Search PubMed for articles by:
Shea, K. M. || Committee on Environmental Health,
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager
Collections under which this article appears:
Therapeutics & Toxicology
 


PEDIATRICS Vol. 111 No. 6 June 2003, pp. 1467-1474

 


TECHNICAL REPORT

Pediatric Exposure and Potential Toxicity of Phthalate Plasticizers

Katherine M. Shea, MD, MPH and Committee on Environmental Health

ABSTRACT

Phthalates are plasticizers that are added to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) products to impart flexibility and durability. They are produced in high volume and generate extensive though poorly defined human exposures and unique childhood exposures. Phthalates are animal carcinogens and can cause fetal death, malformations, and reproductive toxicity in laboratory animals. Toxicity profiles and potency vary by specific phthalate. The extent of these toxicities and their applicability to humans remains incompletely characterized and controversial. Two phthalates, diethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and diisononyl phthalate (DINP), have received considerable attention recently because of specific concerns about pediatric exposures. Like all phthalates, DEHP and DINP are ubiquitous contaminants in food, indoor air, soils, and sediments. DEHP is used in toys and medical devices. DINP is a major plasticizer used in children’s toys.

Scientific panels, advocacy groups, and industry groups have analyzed the literature on DEHP and DINP and have come to different conclusions about their safety. The controversy exists because risk to humans must be extrapolated from animal data that demonstrate differences in toxicity by species, route of exposure, and age at exposure and because of persistent uncertainties in human exposure data. This report addresses sensitive endpoints of reproductive and developmental toxicity and the unique aspects of pediatric exposures to phthalates that generate concern. DEHP and DINP are used as specific examples to illustrate the controversy.

 

Abbreviations: PVC, polyvinyl chloride • DEHP, diethylhexyl phthalate • DINP, diisononyl phthalate • MEHP, monoethylhexyl phthalate • ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation • NOAEL, no observable adverse effect level • LOAEL, lowest observable adverse effect level • CERHR, Center for the Evaluation of Reproductive Risks to Humans • DBP, dibutyl phthalate

 



[For Subscribers]
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. [Disclaimer]

 

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.