CHICAGO -- A new lung cancer treatment regimen could prevent up to
10,000 deaths worldwide annually, according to a French study that provides rare
positive news for sufferers of the most prolific killer among cancers.
Two other studies -- one involving a new surgery and the other a
low-side-effect drug -- also reported benefits for lung cancer patients, marking
a flurry of advances that researchers celebrated yesterday at the American
Society of Clinical Oncology conference here.
But the good news was tinged with bad. The life-saving treatment described in
the French study -- a combination of surgery, the drug cisplatin, which is
produced by Bristol-Myers Squibb under the name Platinol, and several other
standard chemotherapies -- could only help a small portion of the world's lung
cancer patients. About 1.2 million are expected to die of the disease worldwide
this year.
The new surgical procedure, which slightly extends patients' life spans, also
kills a small number of patients on the operating table, leaving doctors to
wonder whether the procedure is worth the risk.
In addition, the new drug called pemetrexed, which is made by Eli Lilly & Co.
under the name Alimta, was found to be less toxic but did not heal patients any
better than standard chemotherapy. Nevertheless, lung cancer researchers said
the studies represent significant progress for a disease that kills 85 percent
of its victims within five years. Dr. Bruce Johnson, a lung cancer specialist at
the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who introduced the three studies, said they
''will change the practice of lung cancer therapy.''
The American Society of Clinical Oncology, host of this high-profile annual
conference, put the spotlight on lung cancer research yesterday in part to
underscore that lung cancer is unjustly neglected among cancers.
''Breast cancer is an important disease, but lung cancer kills more women,''
said Dr. Kathy S. Albain, a breast and lung cancer specialist at Loyola
University's Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center in Chicago. ''Lung cancer in this
country is undertreated.''
The most significant of the studies, which involved researchers from five
continents, was a massive 1,867-patient trial that tested surgery followed by
treatment with cisplatin plus chemotherapy compared with surgery alone.
Patients who underwent surgery and chemotherapy had a median survival time of
51 months, compared with 44 months for the other patients.
After five years, 45 percent of the surgery-plus-chemo group was alive,
compared with 40 percent of the other patients. If the treatment were offered
worldwide, about 10,000 deaths would be delayed every year. The study marked a
significant advance for a limited group of lung cancer patients that is certain
to change the way oncologists treat them, specialists said.
''A 5 percent increase in survival is significant enough to recommend
chemotherapy after surgery,'' said Dr. Thierry Le Chevalier of the Institut
Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, France, who led the study.
The results for a new surgical approach to treating patients whose lung
cancer has spread to surrounding lymph nodes -- about 34,000 Americans are
diagnosed annually at this stage -- were more ambiguous.
Chemotherapy plus radiation has been standard treatment, but a Chicago-based
team decided to add resection surgery, in which surgeons remove parts of the
cancerous organs.
After three years, 38 percent of the surgical patients were alive, compared
with 33 percent of the other group. However, 17 of the 392 surgical patients in
the trial died shortly after the procedure, mostly due to respiratory
complications from the surgery.
Loyola's Albain, who led the study, said the results were positive enough to
at least discuss with patients. ''We now have two viable options to offer our
patients,'' Albain said.
The third study concerned so-called second-line chemotherapy, the treatment
given to patients whose cancers return after initial chemotherapy.
Here, the new drug, pemetrexed, performed no better than the current
medication in extending life expectancy beyond eight months. But the test
patients on the newer drug had significantly lower rates of infection, fever,
and pneumonia, side effects that can lead to hospitalization.
Doctors must carefully weigh the risks and benefits involved and quickly
identify patients who might benefit from the new treatments, cancer specialists
said.
Dana-Farber's Johnson said, ''I'm going to go home and discuss the results of
these studies with my patients.''
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"