Return to Vaccination News Home Page

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/conditions/06/02/cancer.bloodblocker.ap/index.html

Study: Blood blockers aid cancer survival

Tuesday, June 3, 2003 Posted: 8:58 AM EDT (1258 GMT)

Dr. Herbert Hurwitz, left, and Dr. Robert Mayer, address reporters Sunday in Chicago.
Dr. Herbert Hurwitz, left, and Dr. Robert Mayer, address reporters Sunday in Chicago.

Story Tools
Save a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.comSave a link to this article and return to it at www.savethis.com  Email a link to this articleEmail a link to this article  
Printer-friendly version of this articlePrinter-friendly version of this article  View a list of the most popular articles on our siteView a list of the most popular articles on our site  

CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) -- The benefits so far are small, but a new study proves scientists pursuing one of cancer treatment's most intriguing theories -- that the way to attack a tumor's heart is through its blood supply -- at least are on the right track.

In a separate study presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, doctors concluded Erbitux, the cancer drug that enmeshed ImClone Systems in an insider trading scandal, worked just as well as an earlier company-sponsored study said it did. (Full story)

Shares of the two cancer drugs' makers soared Monday on the news of the promising results.

The research targeting a tumor's blood supply was developed around the idea that cancer needs a growing network of blood vessels to survive -- a theory championed by Harvard University's Dr. Judah Folkman. According to the theory, shutting down the process, called angiogenesis, should arrest tumors and even obliterate them.

After decades of obscurity, Folkman's theory became front-page news in 1998 with reports his angiogenesis-blocking drugs cured mice. Some predicted he was on the verge of curing human cancer, too.

Proving that has been difficult. However, on Sunday, researchers released a study of Genentech's experimental angiogenesis stopper, Avastin, which showed the drug modestly lengthened survival -- notable in a field where even inch-by-inch improvement can be hard to document.

"This is a landmark announcement," said Dr. William Li, head of the nonprofit Angiogenesis Foundation. "It's the first true validation in a well-designed clinical trial that cutting off a tumor's blood supply can improve cancer survival."

The treatment is an antibody aimed against vascular endothelial growth factor, or VEGF, one of the more than 20 chemicals that help tumors' blood vessels grow and survive.

The study, directed by Dr. Herbert Hurwitz of Duke University, involved 925 colon cancer patients who all received a standard chemotherapy cocktail of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. They were also randomly given either Avastin or a dummy placebo.

Those on Avastin survived an average of 20 months, compared with nearly 16 months in those getting only standard treatment. The results were a surprise, since an earlier study found no benefit of Avastin against breast cancer.

Dr. Mace Rothenberg of Vanderbilt said when he was in medical school, such patients typically survived just six months. "This improves median survival by about 30 percent," he said. "When you put it in those terms, it is very meaningful to patients."
 


Copyright 2003 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

 

© 2003 Cable News Network LP, LLLP.
An AOL Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines. Contact us.

 

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.