Tuesday, June 3, 2003 Posted: 8:58 AM EDT (1258 GMT)
Dr. Herbert Hurwitz,
left, and Dr. Robert Mayer, address reporters Sunday in
Chicago.
Story Tools
CHICAGO, Illinois (AP) --The benefits so far are small, but a new study proves
scientists pursuing one of cancer treatment's most intriguing theories -- that
the way to attack a tumor's heart is through its blood supply -- at least are on
the right track.
In a separate study presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
doctors concluded Erbitux, the cancer drug that enmeshed ImClone Systems in an
insider trading scandal, worked just as well as an earlier company-sponsored
study said it did. (Full
story)
Shares of the two cancer drugs' makers soared Monday on the news of the
promising results.
The research targeting a tumor's blood supply was developed around the idea
that cancer needs a growing network of blood vessels to survive -- a theory
championed by Harvard University's Dr. Judah Folkman. According to the theory,
shutting down the process, called angiogenesis, should arrest tumors and even
obliterate them.
After decades of obscurity, Folkman's theory became front-page news in 1998
with reports his angiogenesis-blocking drugs cured mice. Some predicted he was
on the verge of curing human cancer, too.
Proving that has been difficult. However, on Sunday, researchers released a
study of Genentech's experimental angiogenesis stopper, Avastin, which showed
the drug modestly lengthened survival -- notable in a field where even
inch-by-inch improvement can be hard to document.
"This is a landmark announcement," said Dr. William Li, head of the nonprofit
Angiogenesis Foundation. "It's the first true validation in a well-designed
clinical trial that cutting off a tumor's blood supply can improve cancer
survival."
The treatment is an antibody aimed against vascular endothelial growth
factor, or VEGF, one of the more than 20 chemicals that help tumors' blood
vessels grow and survive.
The study, directed by Dr. Herbert Hurwitz of Duke University, involved 925
colon cancer patients who all received a standard chemotherapy cocktail of
irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. They were also randomly given either
Avastin or a dummy placebo.
Those on Avastin survived an average of 20 months, compared with nearly 16
months in those getting only standard treatment. The results were a surprise,
since an earlier study found no benefit of Avastin against breast cancer.
Dr. Mace Rothenberg of Vanderbilt said when he was in medical school, such
patients typically survived just six months. "This improves median survival by
about 30 percent," he said. "When you put it in those terms, it is very
meaningful to patients."
Copyright 2003 The
Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
DISCLAIMER: All
information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for
general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the
knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended
as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate
is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in
consultation with your health care provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"