| SARS vaccine work put on fast track; 3 years, scientist
says
Sunday, June 01, 2003
By Daniel Q. Haney, The Associated Press
Fifteen or 20 years to create a new vaccine is considered quite
speedy. So the federal government's blueprint for a shot to stop the
SARS epidemic in a mere three years seems positively head-snapping.
Can it be done?
Certainly, says Dr. Gary Nabel, chief of the Vaccine Research
Center at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
"If everything went perfectly," he qualifies. "If all the stars were
aligned."
The stars almost never align precisely in medical research. But
if they do, Nabel says scientists will finish all the basic lab
work, creating the vaccine, testing it in animals, in just one year.
Then they will spend two more trying it out on people to make
sure it works, turn the results over to the Food and Drug
Administration and be done.
No vaccine in modern times has gone from start to finish nearly
that fast. But even if Nabel's time line proves unrealistic, his
willingness to state it out loud shows how seriously the government
takes SARS.
The strategy for changing the pace from glacial to galactic:
Forget solving problems one at a time.
At Nabel's institute, two teams are working separately to create
possible vaccines. One sticks to the time-tested approach of making
them with dead or weakened viruses. The other builds them with
up-to-the-second gene-splicing tools.
Instead of dealing with big technical issues in the usual
one-by-one order, scientists will jump into all of them at once. For
instance, they are gearing up production of newly minted vaccines at
the same time they figure out how to test them in animals and tease
apart exactly how the human immune system does the job of fighting
off SARS on its own.
"Parallel tracking," Nabel calls this. It's also called science
in a hurry.
Why the rush? Why work so hard to defend against a disease that
is just a few months old, that has yet to kill a single person in
the United States?
No one knows how bad SARS will become, whether it will burn out
or continue to spread, even exactly how it makes people so sick. But
the consensus among the country's top health officials is that it
would be foolish to wait and see.
Even if SARS is somehow contained in China and Taiwan, many
experts doubt it will ever be wiped from the planet, even though
this is the World Health Organization's goal. More likely, they say,
the virus will come and go, perhaps in some seasonal pattern, maybe
by chance.
No matter what happens in the next few months, federal officials
promise to keep working on a vaccine so the world will be ready
whenever, wherever SARS returns.
"We need a vaccine. There's no question about it," says Dr.
Anthony Fauci, head of the infectious disease institute. "This is
potentially disastrous enough that we can't just hope it will go
away and stay away."
The government is not alone in this. It is encouraging private
vaccine makers to take a crack at SARS. In April, Health and Human
Services Secretary Tommy Thompson hosted a meeting of vaccine
scientists where government researchers shared what they knew about
the virus and promised them samples to work with.
"They more or less said, 'We want your entrepreneurial brains
working on this,' " says Una Ryan, president of Avant
Immunotherapeutics.
Labs from Hong Kong to Canada are also tackling SARS vaccines,
and Fauci said his institute will sign contracts with up to a dozen
companies to help with development.
At this point, however, the single biggest question is still
unanswered: Is a SARS vaccine even possible?
Dr. Emilio Emini, head of vaccine development at Merck, is among
those trying to answer this. For now he refuses even to hazard a
guess.
"This is a new virus. So much is not understood," he says. "It's
a big black box."
Still, Nabel says he knows of at least three major pharmaceutical
companies besides Merck, the world's largest vaccine maker, that
have gone to work on SARS, even though no one can be sure whether
there will ever be a market for a vaccine.
Their success will depend on figuring out a way to train the
body's immune system to see the SARS virus quickly, to recognize it
as dangerous and to kill it before it makes people sick. |