Virtual medicine - Students train on
simulation mannequin
By Alison C. Burggren -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 a.m. PDT Friday, July 25, 2003
Get weekday updates of
Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news.
Sign up here.
Nervous fingers on the gloved hands of the medical student trembled slightly as
he slid the catheter into the patient's body. The 59-year-old patient had a
blocked artery leading to his kidney and needed a cylindrical stent, or piece of
tubing, inserted to open up the clogged artery.
All at once the worst happened -- the student nicked the artery, machines
started beeping and the student's heart sank.
The patient's life, however, was not top priority in this case. Instead, it
was all about training the doctor.
This scenario is one of many expected to play out within the walls of a
simulation suite at UC Davis' Center for Virtual Care.
Robert Chason, chief operating officer of the UC Davis Health System, said the
old adage "See one, do one, teach one," may soon be a thing of the past in
medical training.
At the center of this revolution in medical training is the third simulation
mannequin of its kind in the country. "Simantha," from Medical Simulation Corp.,
arrived this month at UC Davis and is so realistic that physicians can "feel"
lesions in blood vessels and hear the patient's voice throughout the procedure.
Dr. David Dawson, associate professor of clinical surgery and specialist in
vascular surgery at UC Davis, said he's had to take months off at a time to
travel around the country to learn new surgical techniques throughout his
career.
With Simantha, physicians can learn new surgeries within weeks without ever
putting a patient's life in danger.
Simulation training is not a new technology. The military and airlines use
flight simulators to train pilots, and other medical simulation equipment has
allowed students to learn basic techniques such as inserting an IV line.
What makes Simantha different is the level of detail that makes it realistic.
At the beginning of the procedure, a computer-generated face representing the
admitting emergency room physician appears on the screen and in a chatty sort of
voice lists the patient's history, heart rate, blood pressure, allergies and
medication.
It's up to the physician to diagnose the problem, dispense medications and
take computer-generated X-rays with a foot pedal while implanting a stent to
repair a damaged blood vessel. All of the simulation procedures revolve around
implantation of a stent in the patient to repair damaged blood vessels.
The expected payoff is fewer mistakes, complications and deaths due to a
botched procedure. The simulation computers give physicians feedback immediately
after the procedure, comparing the decisions they made to textbook procedures.
All of the programs are written by physcians, and new ones can be added to the
system as they are created.
A recent study published in the Annals of Surgery, a major medical
publication, supports the expectation of reduced mistakes with virtual training.
Surgical residents trained in a new way to remove gallbladders using simulation
technology committed one-fifth fewer errors than the group trained with the
usual video materials and lectures.
There are important differences from practicing on a live patient. No scalpel
is used to open the patient, and a catheter to guide the stent is already
inserted into the skin when the doctor begins the procedure. It's the surgeon's
responsibility to move the stent to the right location as guided by interactive
computer images.
But the environment is made to feel as real as possible -- with surgical
drapes around the patient and EKG results displayed on computers hovering over
the patient's body. The surgeon can even feel resistance in the catheter when it
"hits" the end of a blood vessel displayed on the X-ray screens.
An entire simulation can take three to four hours, similar to the actual
length of the corresponding surgery in a live patient.
Catheter-based surgeries can be delicate, more delicate than replacing the
damaged vessel completely, and require a great deal of coordination among a team
of physicians. Surgeons often choose between putting a catheter in a damaged
blood vessel or replacing the damaged part of the vessel completely.
"But catheters are the way the industry is going," Dawson said. It's less
invasive and often has a much faster recovery time for the patient.
Dawson said that one procedure last week involved one of the physicians in
the surgical team, chief resident Lisa Abramson, who had extensive surgical
experience but had never performed this exact operation before. Dawson said
surgeons like Abramson will benefit from simulation technology.
Simulation surgery can mimic real-life complications, giving surgeons and
operating teams the skills to reduce the time of real surgeries.
The system, Dawson and Chason said separately, could also be used to test
physicians' skills after training. One day it could be required on the medical
licensing exam.
Chason said that this is just "one more piece of technology" in an effort to
create a virtual hospital within the UC Davis medical system. There is also a
surgical robot intended to allow surgeons at UC Davis one day to perform
surgeries at remote hospitals.
The realism of the simulation can be striking, even to professionals.
Simantha's introduction, Chason said, was on televisions in front of a
roomful of cardiologists, none of whom knew the surgery they were watching was
being done on a simulation model until the surgeon touched his headphones,
essentially breaking the sterile field around the patient, and went directly
back to surgery. A perplexed murmur immediately filled the confused room of
clinicians.
About the Writer
---------------------------
The Bee's Alison Burggren can be reached at (916) 321-1008 or
aburggren@sacbee.com.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"