Greenpeace today published a scientific investigation into toxic
chemicals in house dust, revealing their widespread presence in
homes across the UK. In November 2002, Greenpeace vacuumed 100
houses across the country to collect dust that was later sent to
laboratories to be analysed for a range of harmful pollutants (1),
chemicals for which health concerns are widely acknowledged.
The dangerous chemicals Greenpeace targeted for investigation were
not those coming from traffic fumes or factory chimneys but unseen
and often unlabelled chemical additives brought into our homes
inside everyday consumer products like toys, televisions, carpets
and toiletries.
The majority of chemicals that have been identified in house dust
arise from the use of consumer goods used in the home. This is
despite some manufacturers' claims that these chemicals are bound
into products and present no risk. Humans can breathe in the dust
and any chemicals it contains or ingest it from contaminated food or
teething toys or even absorb it directly through our skin.
Greenpeace chemicals campaigner Oliver Knowles said,
"This report exposes the fact that widespread chemical contamination
is not just there in the 'outside world' but in our homes, our
offices and everyday lives. People know that chemical pollution can
find its way into their homes from busy roads or dirty factories but
do not expect unseen poisons to be escaping into our bedrooms and
living rooms from every day products like toys and televisions. From
there they can contaminate our body tissue and the tissue of unborn
children.
Greenpeace found substantial amounts of
hormone disrupting akylphenols, used in cosmetics and
other personal care products
phthalate esters used mainly to soften PVC which are
harmful to the reproductive system,
brominated chemicals which disrupt hormones, used as fire
retardants
chlorinated paraffins which may be cancer-causing, used in
paints, plastics and rubbers.
New laws currently being drafted by the EU present a rare
opportunity to improve legislation on chemicals, which for years has
failed to protect people and the environment from contamination. The
current EU wide review of chemicals policy was initiated by the
Commission in February 2001 in response to mounting concern about
the effectiveness of existing legislation.
Greenpeace believes the action required is simple. The proposed new
EU laws require that chemicals of the highest concern carry an
'authorisation' to allow only specific continued uses. Greenpeace
supports this but believes this action is meaningless unless a
second step is put in place - chemical producing companies must be
placed under a legal obligation to substitute these chemicals of
high concern wherever a safer alternative exists. Where an
alternative does not exist and the chemical is deemed essential, an
authorisation must only be granted for a limited time period to
allow for safer alternative chemicals, material or products to be
developed. Any such authorisations must be based on strong
justification that the chemicals are really essential.
Oliver Knowles, said;
"The EU have recognised the major problem chemical pollution is
causing but are shying away from solving it. Companies must be
legally obliged to substitute dangerous chemicals for the safest
available alternative. Only then can we take a real step towards
ridding our environment, our homes and our lives of these lingering
chemicals that threaten ourselves and our children with cancers and
other health problems."
Further information
Journalists can obtain 'Consuming chemicals: Hazardous chemicals in
house dust as an indicator of chemical exposure in the home' from
the Greenpeace Press Office and from our
briefings library.
For more information please contact Greenpeace Press Office on 020
7865 8255
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"