Mercury Wars- The beginning of a new awareness.

Ralf Windsor continues his series of articles about the horrors of mercury poisoning.

Since last October the BNP has been trying to highlight the dangers of the second most toxic substance on the planet. Plutonium is the first most toxic, but only by a short head. This is an update on world events, so if you want to be fully informed on the dangers of mercury then please read the last two articles on this site. You never know. It could save you or your children from long-term or permanent illness.

(Previous articles Mercury Wars 1 and Mercury Wars 2)

Where is this toxin?
It can be found in our children’s fillings and in their injections, plus of course our own mouths.

What happens to old fillings?
They are treated with extreme care as highly toxic waste…put under acid in special containers and then recycled into new amalgam fillings.

Why isn’t Tony doing anything about it when many other countries have banned or are banning Mercury in fillings and vaccines?
When we questioned Tony’s credibility the first two times in the last two 'Mercury Wars' articles we were criticised for being over-sceptical about our leader, but now through every fault of his own new polls suggest that 66 per cent of the population don’t trust him.

Most of the awareness seems to be coming from the US, but of those well-informed professionals closer to home, a UK dentist has been warning us for years about the dangers of mercury and is helping many people recover from the terrifying effects of mercury poisoning from amalgam. His site contains a short explanation of the effects of Mercury.
See… www.hallvtox.dircon.co.uk/ and click on `mercury/amalgam.`

Recent Events.

• 12,000 Californian dentists now have the following notice in their surgeries to warn their patients about the possible devastating effects of their own materials.

For more details see www.toxicteeth.net

Australia has a fully approved cancer treatment centre for breast- and other cancers. They will not treat cancer sufferers unless they have all their amalgam fillings (53 per cent mercury) removed first.
The following site lists mercury from fillings as one of several causes of cancer, yet the NHS in the UK hide in fear when the issue is raised.

And closer to home …

June 3rd 2003. ‘Amalgam to be discontinued in dental care’.
(Swedish and Norwegian newspapers headlines, Dagens Nyheter, Sweden).
June 18th 2003. ‘Toxic metals a clue to autism.’ (New Scientist).
June 19th 2003. ‘Mercury may be the cause of autism.’ (Discovery Channel).
June 19th 2003. ‘Mercury linked to autism.’ ( Health-News.co.uk )

July the 2nd 2003. [Translated as] ‘Over and out for AMALGAM’ …
… Starting today, dentists may only use amalgam in teeth as an exception to the rule." (Norwegian Radio NRK [national station] as headline news).

Now we have some legal questions for Tony.

Is it not EU law that if one member country bans a poison that is affecting it’s citizens then all must follow suit?
And why have you not done a thing when you have known about this mercury poisoning for a long time?

Other questions may spring to mind once we fully understand the awful truth that has been hidden from us;

How in all conscience can he hide the truth and allow many of the population to be poisoned, when much of the rest of the world is doing something to help its people?

Is he so busy inventing spins that he doesn't read the news?

As a father how can he allow so many children to be abused by this poison?

Tony! Please stop trying to emulate ‘Don Quixote’ in an attempt to impress the world, and help eradicate the very real weapons of mass destruction in your own backyard.

For the record, the BNP is also opposed to the Blairite nanny state extension of forcible fluoridation of Britain's water supply. We regard this as unacceptable for two reasons:

a) The clear weight of medical evidence showing the fluoride is a dangerous poison - industrial waste disguised as a tooth-saver - especially for children;
b) We do not believe that the State has the moral right to subject the public to enforced 'medication' without consent or the opportunity to refuse it.