Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://adc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/abstract/archdischild%3b88/8/684

Full Text of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Email this link to a friend
eLetters: Submit a response to this article
Similar articles found in:
ADC Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Search PubMed for articles by:
Liese, J G || The Munich Vaccine Study Group,
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager
Collections under which this article appears:
Other Epidemiology
Drugs: immunological products and vaccines
Other respiratory infections

Archives of Disease in Childhood 2003;88:684-687
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

 


ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical and epidemiological picture of B pertussis and B parapertussis infections after introduction of acellular pertussis vaccines

J G Liese, C Renner, S Stojanov, B H Belohradsky and The Munich Vaccine Study Group

University Childrens Hospital Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Lindwurmstr. 4, 80337 Munich, Germany

 

Correspondence to:
Dr J Liese, Universitäts-Kinderklinik im Dr. v. Haunerschen Kinderspital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Lindwurmstr. 4, 80337 Munich, Germany;
Johannes.Liese@kk-i.med.uni-muenchen.de

Aims: To investigate the clinical picture and frequency of Bordetella pertussis and B parapertussis infections after introduction of acellular pertussis (acP) vaccines in Germany.

Methods: Prospective surveillance for B pertussis and B parapertussis in 14 144 toddlers. Pertussis vaccination coverage was 86%, either with acP (75%) or whole cell pertussis (wcP) vaccine (11%). All children presenting with cough for more than seven days were examined for B pertussis and B parapertussis by culture, PCR, and serology (for cough duration >=21 days).

Results: There were 180 Bordetella infections; 116 (64%) were caused by B pertussis and 64 (36%) by B parapertussis. Incidence rates were 4.8 and 2.8 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Paroxysmal cough, post-tussive whooping, and vomiting >=21 days was found in 53%, 22%, and 8% of all B pertussis cases and in 22%, 5%, and 0% of all B parapertussis cases, respectively. A total of 81/116 (70%) B pertussis cases and 56/64 (87.5%) B parapertussis cases had received at least one dose of pertussis vaccine. Typical pertussis with paroxysmal cough >=21 days was present in 29/35 (83%) unvaccinated B pertussis cases, in contrast to 33/81 (41%) vaccinated B pertussis cases.

Conclusion: Following the increase of pertussis vaccination coverage, we observed a relative increase of B parapertussis cases in comparison to B pertussis cases. In vaccinated children B pertussis disease frequently presented as a mild disease, clinically difficult to distinguish from diseases associated with coughing caused by B parapertussis and other viral or bacterial infections.

 


Keywords: B pertussis; B parapertussis; epidemiology; incidence; pertussis vaccine


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.