Parents who believe the MMR
jab caused their children to develop autism have hit back at a study
which claims the link between the vaccine and the condition is "not
real".
The Government insists the Measles Mumps and Rubella (MMR) vaccine
is safe, but many parents are refusing to take their children for
the jab over fears it might be linked to autism.
Now researchers say the huge increase in cases of autism seen since
1979 may simply be the result of more awareness and better
record-keeping.
Professor Brent Taylor and colleagues from the Royal Free and
University College Medical School in London argue that the apparent
increase in cases is "not real".
They said the increase was probably due to "increased recognition, a
greater willingness to accept the diagnostic label, and better
recording systems".
The new findings are based on 567 autistic children born between
1979 and 1998.
More than 2,000 parents, such as Susan Tompkins from Horncastle,
believe their children developed autism as a result of the MMR
vaccine and are taking legal action against the drug companies who
produce it.
Mrs Tompkins' eight-year-old son Joshua was diagnosed with autism at
the age of four. He suffered a serious reaction after having the
combined jab, developing a measle-like rash and vomiting.
"This study only looks at records, which don't necessarily show a
link between MMR and autism," she said.
"If they were to look back at Joshua's records, they would see he
was diagnosed as autistic aged four and nothing else. There isn't
even a record of the reaction he had after having the MMR.
"The study also only looks at records up to 1998, when a link
between MMR and autism was only suggested in 1998.
"Before that, there would have been no reason to record a link
between MMR and autism. I think if they did the study again for the
last five years then their findings would be considerably
different."
Louth-based GP Dr Peter Mansfield, who gives single vaccines against
the childhood diseases, claims the study is just another attempt to
justify the Government's triple vaccine policy.
"The clinical evidence based on actual visits to actual people has
made a case for the link between MMR and autism to the degree of a
racing certainty," he said.
"The problem is that the Government is, sooner or later, going to
have to admit this link and admitting things seems to be against
their religion.
"These studies look at records but they do not consider what is not
recorded.
"They look at figures, not people, and clinical studies are what is
needed. And it is these clinical studies, all over the world, that
have shown there is a link."
In 1998 Dr Andrew Wakefield, then also based at the Royal Free
medical school, claimed to have found an association between
regressive autism and bowel problems that possibly related to the
MMR vaccine.
He argued that because of uncertainty about its safety, the MMR
vaccine should be withdrawn.
And in 2001, the Autism Research Unit at the University of
Sunderland reported a tenfold increase in autism rates over the
previous decade.
Professor Taylor's study found that triggers cited by parents for
their children's autism differed before and after the scare.
The researchers wrote: "Before August 1997, parents incriminated
trigger factors such as domestic stress, seizures, or viral illness.
"Post-1997 parents were more likely to attribute regression to
vaccination, especially the MMR vaccine."
The vaccine was cited as a trigger in two out of 46 autism cases
before 1997, but six out of 30 cases after 1997.
A Department of Health spokesman said: "There is no credible
scientific evidence showing an association between MMR and autism.
MMR remains the best way of protecting a child from measles, mumps
and rubella.
"The department's priority is to give accurate information to
parents that explains the real benefits of MMR, and describes for
them the very few risks that could occur."
Who do you believe? Write to Your View at the Lincolnshire Echo,
Brayford Wharf East, Lincoln LN5 7AT.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.