Providing the
latest information about Public Citizen activities
-------------------------------------------
July 22, 2003
Public Citizen
Calls for Federal Investigation of Medical Schools That Conduct Unethical
Research on Their Students
Coercive Tactics,
Lack of Independent Review Plague
Annual 'Graduation
Questionnaire'
WASHINGTON, D.C. -
Many medical schools in the United States coerce their students to complete a
research questionnaire that includes personal topics such as sexual harassment
and personal debt - in violation of federal law and ethical standards, Public
Citizen said today. In a letter to the Office for Human Research Protections, a
division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Citizen
urged the government to investigate these unethical and potentially illegal
research practices.
Each year, the
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) coordinates the administration
of the Graduation Questionnaire (GQ) to more than 15,000 final-year medical
students. Individual universities are responsible for implementing the
questionnaire, which is designed by the AAMC; in their eagerness to get students
to complete the GQ, some schools overstep legal and ethical bounds.
Public Citizen has
three main concerns. First, some schools threaten to withhold the student's
medical degree or other benefits if the student does not complete the GQ - a
clear breach of international ethical standards and federal law. Second, many
schools ignore a federal requirement that research at federally funded
institutions that use human subjects undergoes a formal ethics review. That
review would ensure that the GQ's confidentiality procedures are adequate and
should prevent coercion. Third, students are not told that their responses might
become part of published journal articles.
"Rather than
taking this opportunity to educate medical students on the importance of
research ethics, the AAMC and the individual medical schools have taken the easy
but unethical road," said Joshua Rising, M.D., a first-year resident at the
University of California at San Francisco who took the GQ this year under
coercive conditions at Boston University.
Public Citizen
learned that at least 13 of 23 medical schools contacted penalize students
unwilling to take the GQ (see table). Seven of these schools block the
graduation of any student who refuses to take the GQ, while six withdraw
benefits (such as the student's family's tickets to
graduation) if
they do not comply.
"I'll simply say
that we get every student to comply...because if they don't, then they don't get
their diploma...It's just that simple. We get 100 percent cooperation," an
administrator at the University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine
wrote in an e-mail to Rising.
Such coercive
tactics violate the right of an individual to decide whether to participate in a
research study and are never acceptable under standards established in the World
Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki, the Nuremberg Code and federal
law for all institutions receiving federal funds.
Of nine
institutions providing information about this topic, only one subjects the GQ to
review by a federally mandated ethics board, called an Institutional Review
Board (IRB). An IRB is required for any research, "including research
development...and evaluation," that adds to "generalizable knowledge." As the
information generated by the GQ has been published in almost two dozen
peer-reviewed journal articles, the GQ is clearly performing a research
function.
"We recognize that
the GQ is an important resource and ask only that the data are collected
ethically and legally," said Peter Lurie, M.D., deputy director of Public
Citizen's Health Research Group. "It's time to stop the coercion of students and
bring medical schools back in line with contemporary ethical standards."
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"