Focus on
Smallpox Threat Revived
Experts Say Immunization
Program Is Crucial to Homeland Security
By Ceci Connolly
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, July 17, 2003; Page
A03
National security experts inside and outside the
Bush administration, fearing the president's smallpox
immunization program is all but dead, have begun a major
public relations campaign to inject new life into a
project they describe as vital to homeland protection.
In a series of interviews and published articles,
Pentagon officials, conservative thinkers and a few
public health officials argue that without a sizable
network of inoculated health care workers, the United
States remains ill-equipped to respond to a smallpox
attack. And, they contend, anxiety about the dangerous
side effects of the vaccine should be quelled by the
success of the military in immunizing nearly a
half-million personnel with few serious complications.
"Our goal at this point should be to meet
[President Bush's] plan and to vaccinate the number of
people originally targeted in the health care community
of between 400,000 and 500,000," said William
Winkenwerder Jr., assistant secretary of defense for
health affairs. "I would certainly be more comfortable
if we had that number of civilians prepared to respond."
At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
in Atlanta, Director Julie L. Gerberding said she hopes
to unveil a strategy soon to "reaffirm the importance of
the smallpox program because of the dreaded
consequences" of an attack. The agency plans to
distribute $100 million to states to step up
vaccinations.
But even some supporters of the Bush policy say
the opportunity to vaccinate millions before an attack
has been missed, with the effort plagued by mixed
messages, safety fears and the lack of evidence that
Saddam Hussein possessed stocks of the deadly virus.
"People are now back in dumb-and-happy mode," said
Tara O'Toole, director of the Center for Civilian
Biodefense Strategies at Johns Hopkins University. Gone,
she said, is the sense of urgency that people felt last
winter "when we were going into Iraq, and the
possibility of a smallpox attack was seen as much more
plausible."
Seven months after the president announced he was
resuming smallpox inoculations, after a 30-year hiatus,
as part of the effort to protect the United States
against biological attacks, the program is in danger of
virtually vanishing.
In recent months, top officials such as Bush, Vice
President Cheney and Homeland Security Secretary Tom
Ridge have rarely mentioned the threat of a smallpox
attack or the need to vaccinate millions of emergency
responders. Neither has Senate Majority Leader Bill
Frist (R-Tenn.) or Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona,
although both were immunized in front of cameras to
publicize the effort in March.
With few exceptions, state and local health
departments have shifted their attention to more
immediate concerns, such as severe acute respiratory
syndrome (SARS), West Nile virus and back-to-school
shots. And two respected groups -- the Institute of
Medicine and the CDC's Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices -- have called for a halt to
smallpox vaccinations, citing concerns about heart
complications related to the vaccine.
To date, fewer than 40,000 public health and
hospital employees have been immunized. And despite
Bush's promise to make vaccine shots available to the
general public this summer, Gerberding said yesterday
that a new vaccine will not be ready for another year.
Nearly 50,000 doses of smallpox vaccine have been
discarded because the opened vials had passed their
expiration dates.
All of that frightens William Bicknell and Kenneth
Bloem, two smallpox experts who drafted a position paper
for the libertarian Cato Institute warning that the
United States has not done enough to prepare.
"We should be well on our way to protecting the
nation's civilian population by vaccinating up to 10
million health, emergency and public safety workers.
However, we are stalled," the pair wrote. "We call on
CDC to do a far better job in publicizing the safety of
vaccination for healthy adults and we call on the Bush
administration to revitalize our preparations for a
smallpox bioterrorist event."
The sharpest criticism of the vaccination campaign
has been that Bush and his deputies failed to articulate
-- and continually reinforce -- a rationale for using a
vaccine known for its side effects. Though she is
well-versed and plugged-in, even O'Toole said: "To this
day, I don't know what the purpose was."
Some now fret that Bush's declaration that
hostilities in Iraq have ended left the mistaken
impression there is no longer a threat.
"We know that the former Soviet Union had large
quantities of weaponized smallpox or smallpox that could
be used in an offensive manner," Winkenwerder said. "All
of those stores are not accounted for, to our
knowledge."
He and Army Col. John D. Grabenstein, a physician
overseeing Pentagon vaccinations, published an article
in the Journal of the American Medical Association
detailing the results of the military program in an
attempt to encourage participation in the civilian
program.
"It is our hope and desire that in relating our
experience to the broad general public the point can be
made that what we accomplished can be accomplished by
others in the civilian sector," he said. "There is
nothing unique in what we did."
The CDC calculated last year that it would take
1.25 million immunized health workers to run enough
emergency clinics to immunize the U.S. population within
10 days in the event of an attack. Yale University
professor Edward Kaplan said he has seen no evidence the
country is near that capability.
"If you believe it's a serious threat -- and
plenty of credible folks do believe it is a threat --
then it makes sense to be ready to push the button" on
mass immunization, Kaplan said. "We are not in a
position to respond rapidly if we have to."
Michael T. Osterholm, director of the University
of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research
and Policy, said that he would prefer to have the 1.25
million health workers immunized in advance but that it
would "not be a major crisis" if officials spent the
first day of an outbreak doing that.
Gerberding said she feels frustrated by the
emphasis on the small number of people immunized so far.
She said the CDC has not been given credit for its
accomplishments, including purchasing 150 million doses
of vaccine, educating and training the medical
community, upgrading state laboratories, expanding
hospital capabilities and overseeing emergency drills.
"Can we stand up clinics across the country
tomorrow to immunize our nation in 10 days? No," she
acknowledged. Still, we "have made enormous progress."
Ultimately, Gerberding said, it is up to the
states to decide how they will prepare for terrorism,
including a possible smallpox attack.
That helps explain the wide variation in
inoculation rates across the country. Some states, such
as Arizona and Nevada, have immunized fewer than 50
people, while Tennessee has immunized 2,500.
Washington state initially estimated that it would
vaccinate 7,000 medical personnel, said Health Secretary
Mary C. Selecky, who is president of the Association of
State and Territorial Health Officials. But concerns
over liability and reports of heart complications in
some vaccine recipients dampened enthusiasm, and just
543 have been immunized. She said she has shifted her
strategy to identifying people who are ready and willing
to be immunized at the first report of a smallpox case.
Florida Health Secretary John O. Agwunobi pushed
hard to recruit a corps of 3,900 immunized medical
workers spread evenly across all 67 counties -- and he
hopes to continue.
"We are working on the premise the threat
remains," he said. "We're open for business."
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.