In the Senate,
funding questions slow similar legislation seeking vaccines and treatments
against anthrax and other deadly agents. By Vicki Kemper Times Staff Writer
July 17, 2003
WASHINGTON The
House overwhelmingly approved legislation Wednesday designed to encourage
private industry to develop vaccines and other treatments needed to protect U.S.
residents from acts of bioterrorism.
The Houses
418-to-2 approval of Project Bioshield, first proposed by President Bush in his
State of the Union address in January, comes almost two years after the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks that killed about 3,000 people and the mailing of
anthrax-filled letters that killed five people and injured 17.
Two Republicans,
Reps. Jeff Flake of Arizona and Ron Paul of Texas, voted against the bill. All
members of the California delegation, with the exception of Rep. Juanita
Millender-McDonald (D-Carson), who did not vote, voted for the bill.
In the Senate,
similar legislation has bogged down on when to fund the program all at once or
year by year.
This legislation
will help spur the development and availability of next-generation
countermeasures against biological, chemical, nuclear and radiological weapons,
Bush said in a statement released by the White House. I urge the Senate to act
on this very important legislation.
The House bill
would establish a $5.6-billion, 10-year fund for the development, production and
stockpiling of vaccines and other drugs to combat such deadly biological agents
as smallpox, anthrax, botulinum toxin, Ebola and plague.
A ready supply of
such treatments would serve as both an antidote and a deterrent to future
attacks, said Rep. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).
The Bush
administration conceived of Project Bioshield as a way of giving pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies financial incentive to develop products for which
there is no commercial market.
Without this
clear commitment of funding in future years, private-sector companies that are
capable of such development simply wont undertake the heavy investment and
risk, Rep. W.J. Billy Tauzin (R-La.), the bills sponsor, said Wednesday.
Industry response
to the initiative remains unclear.
Last month,
President Bush addressed the annual meeting of the Biotechnology Industry
Organization, telling executives to lobby Congress if they were interested in
seeing more flexibility and more research dollars for the sake of national
security.
Yet the House bill
does not provide for one of the industrys key demands: broad protection against
lawsuits.
The bill is
intended to give the departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human
Services new powers and personnel for assessing bioterrorism threats and
responding to them.
In addition, the
HHS secretary would have the authority to declare a national emergency and,
under such conditions, make available to the public drugs and vaccines that have
not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
Meanwhile, a
smallpox vaccination campaign, the administrations first major post-Sept. 11
effort to prepare the nation for a possible bioterrorist attack, has all but
stalled.
Fewer than 38,000
people had been vaccinated against smallpox as of July 4, almost six months
after Bush unveiled his plan to inoculate up to 500,000 civilian health workers
and 10 million police, fire and other emergency personnel.
The campaign has
been hampered by uncertainty about the threat of a smallpox attack, concerns
about the safety of the vaccine and a delay in the provision for the
compensation of people injured by it.
Six people who
received the vaccine suffered heart attacks some time later, and two of them
died. At least 17 others suffered inflammation of the heart.
The Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, which has continued to investigate a possible
connection between the vaccine and heart ailments, advised people with heart
conditions or certain risk factors against being vaccinated.
Last month, the
CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended that officials
suspend the vaccination program until the CDCs research had been completed.
=============================================
News@nvic.org is a
free service of the National Vaccine Information Center and is supported through
membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect
your informed
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"