Community based retrospective study of sex in infant mortality in India
R Khanna, registrar1, A Kumar,
consultant and head of department1, J F
Vaghela, consultant1, V Sreenivas, assistant professor2, J M Puliyel,
consultant and head of department3
1 Department of Community Medicine, St Stephen's
Hospital, Tis Hazari, Delhi 110054, India, 2 Department of
Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Science, New Delhi 110029, India,
3 Department of Paediatrics, St Stephen's Hospital, Tis Hazari
Objective To determine whether the imbalance in the sex ratio
in India can be explained by less favourable treatment of girlsin
infancy.
Design Analysis of results of verbal autopsy reports over a
five year period.
Setting Community health project in urban India.
Main outcome measures Deaths from all causes in infants agedless than 1 year.
Results The sex ratio at birth was 869 females per 1000 males.The mean infant mortality was 1.3 times higher in females than
in males (72 v 55 per 1000). Diarrhoea was responsible for22%
of deaths overall, though twice as many girls died fromdiarrhoea.
There were no significant differences in the numbersof deaths from
causes such as birth asphyxia, septicaemia,prematurity, and
congenital anomalies. In 10% of deaths therewas no preceding illness
and no satisfactory cause was found.Three out of every four such
deaths were in girls.
Conclusions The excess number of unexplained deaths and deathsdue to treatable conditions such as diarrhoeal disease in girls
may be because girls are regarded and treated less favourablyin
India.
Grave concern is being expressed by social scientists and health professionals
about the adverse sex ratio in India. Accordingto the 2001 Indian
census there are only 933 females per 1000 males.1
Ordinarily women outnumber men, possibly because theextra X
chromosome they carry makes them less susceptible toinfectious
diseases and protects them against sex linked recessive disorders.2
This inversion of the sex ratio in India suggests the existenceof
sex discrimination. The practice of antenatal selectionand
termination of female pregnancies has persisted,3
despite the banning of sex determination tests under the Pre Natal Diagnostic
Techniques Act (PNDT) 1994.4 After birth
mortality is alsohigher in female infants, girls, and young women.5 Girls are 30-50% more likely than boys to die between
their 1st and 5th birthdays.6 Various studies
have previously shown that comparedwith boys, female children are
often brought to health facilitiesin more advanced stages of
illness, are taken to less qualifieddoctors when they are ill, and
have less money spent on medicinesfor them.7
A study in Punjab showed that during the firsttwo years of a child's
life, parents spent 2.3 times more onhealth care for sons than for
daughters.8
In a community based study we looked at the causes of infantdeath
in girls compared with in boys. If there is discriminationand
neglect, there should be an increase in deaths in the neglectedsex
due to causes that would not be fatal with appropriatecare, whereas
death rate for diseases with grave prognosiswould be equal in both
the sexes.
For the past 20 years the community health department of StStephen's
Hospital has been providing comprehensive healthcare in three
socioeconomically deprived areas of DelhiSunderNagari, Tahirpur,
and Amar Colonywith a combined populationof about 64 000 people.
These areas on the outskirts of thecity are relocation settlements
started 20 years ago. Mostof the residents came to Delhi 25 years
ago as migrant workersand were living in inner city slums before
being relocatedhere by the government.9
The average per capita income ofa household in these areas is about
600 rupees per month (£8,$13, 11). Table 1
shows the data on crude birth ratein the area for the study period,
with the average rate being22.3 live births per 1000 population. The
population is 66%Hindu and 34% Muslims, and the birth rates in the
two communitiesare also shown in table 1.
Table 1 Crude birth
rate in study area by year and community (2001 only)
The department has a multidisciplinary staff of about 40, consistingof doctors, public health nurse, auxiliary nurse midwives,and
other health personnel. As the midwives have been workingin the
community for the past 7-10 years, their acceptabilityand rapport
with the families is high. They provide healtheducation and collect
information on births, deaths, pregnancy, immunisation, and family planning.
They record this informationin family based folders and then in the
registers of theirrespective areas. Finally the data are entered
into the computerisedmanagement information system of the department
that was establishedsix years ago. Here we are analysing data for
the five yearperiod from January 1997 to December 2001.
Verbal autopsies are used for finding out the cause of eachdeath.
Every month the midwives discuss any cases with a visiting
paediatrician from the hospital, and the probable cause ofdeath is
noted in the records. In cases where information seemedinadequate,
the midwife or a doctor from the centre revisitedthe house to get
more details. The record of deaths maintainedby the midwives forms
the basis of this study.
We examined the number of live born infants and infant deathseach
year and grouped deaths by sex and analysed the causesof death. All
cases of death of children reported as suddenand without any
preceding illness were categorised as "unexplaineddeaths." We
categorised cases in which the cause of death couldnot be
ascertainedfor example, when the family had moved out of the areaas "data not
available."
We examined overall infant mortality (all deaths in childrenaged
under 1 year per 1000 live births) for each of the fiveyears under
study and compared overall mortality and causespecific mortality by
sex. Analysis was done with EPI-6 statisticalsoftware. Yates
corrected 2
test was used for comparing thecause specific infant mortality among
the two sexes. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant. We calculated odds
ratioswith corresponding confidence intervals for deaths from
differentcauses by sex.
Table 2 shows the numbers of live births and infant deathsby sex. There were 7012 live births, 3752 boys and 3260 girls.
The sex ratio at birth in the area was 869 girls:1000 boys. There were 442
deaths in children under the age of 1 year, 234girls (53%) and 208
boys (47%). The average mortality for theperiod was 63 per 1000 live
births. The figure shows the infantmortality
each year for the two sexes. The mean mortality forgirls was 1.3
times that of the boys (72 v 55 per 1000).
The most common causes of death were diarrhoea (21.5%), birth
asphyxia (14%), immaturity (12.4%), acute respiratory infection
(10.9%), and unexplained deaths (10%) (table 3). Fourteendeaths were classified under other causes. There was significantdifference in mortality between girls and boys for diarrhoea
and unexplained deaths (table 3, P < 0.05). There was nosignificant difference in deaths due to less preventable and
less treatable conditions like birth asphyxia, immaturity, septicaemia, and
congenital anomalies. The largest differencebetween the two sexes
was for unexplained death. Here the mortalityin female infants was
more than three times that in male infants.Half of the deaths
(22/44) in this group occurred in the firstmonth of life. Nineteen
of the 22 deaths due to unexplainedcauses in neonates were among
females.
Table 3 Cause of
death in 442 infants who died aged
1 year
For diarrhoeal diseases the cause specific mortality in female
infants was twice that in male infants. For congenital anomaliesand
birth asphyxia it was higher in male than in female infants,though
not significantly so.
We also looked at the cause specific mortality in Hindu andMuslim
communities (table 4). The average monthly per capitaincome was 679 rupees in Hindus and 423 rupees in Muslims.
There was no significant difference in the cause specific mortality in the two
communities for preventable and treatable causesor less preventable
causes.
Table 4 Comparison
of cause specific infant mortality of two communities
(Hindus and Muslims)
Table 5 shows the mean per capita income of the families
inwhich infant deaths were attributable to various causes. Themean per capita income of families in which infants had died
from diarrhoea was the lowest at 409 rupees, and in familiesin which
the deaths were unexplained was the highest at 537rupees.
Infant mortality in girls
We have shown that in India there are many cases in which deathof a
child is sudden, with no preceding history of illness.These deaths
were classified as unexplained deaths, and mostwere in girls.
Mortality in female infants was 1.3 times higherthan in male
infants. Discrimination, which may lead to increasedmortality among
female children, has been the subject of many previous studies. The World Health
Organization has reportedthat the sex disparities in health and
education are higherin South Asia, including India, than anywhere
else in the world.6
The principal causes of infant mortality in India are low birth
weight, birth injury, diarrhoeal diseases, and acute respiratory infection.10 In our study 22% of deaths were attributed todiarrhoea, 14% to birth asphyxia, 12% to immaturity, and 11%to
respiratory infection. The numbers of male and female infantsdying
of birth asphyxia, septicaemia, immaturity, and congenitalanomalies
were matched and not significantly different. Howeverfor the
preventable and treatable illness of diarrhoea, therewere twice as
many deaths among girls compared with boys.
Verbal autopsy is a standard, well documented, and validated
method of finding cause of death in a developing country like India.1113 Due to paucity of resources,
the cause ofevery death occurring outside a hospital or medical
centrecannot be certified after a postmortem examination. The sampleregistration system of India also depends on verbal autopsyto
classify deaths by cause, particularly in rural areas.14In our study, the information collected by the auxiliary nurse
midwives was scrutinised during monthly meetings with the paediatricianbefore the cause of death was agreed. Most data were collected
within one month of the date of death, so that the period wasnot too
long to influence recall.
For decades international public health efforts have been largely
directed at reducing infant and child mortality. Worldwidea
staggering 8.4 million children die each year before theage of 1
year.15 According to the United Nations, the
globalinfant mortality declined from 93 per 1000 in 1970-5 to 51per 1000 in 2000. However the rate in the least developed countriesis almost 10 times higher than in the more developed countries,
at 89 versus 9 per 1000 live births.16 Infant
mortality inIndia is 68 per 1000 live births17
and was 63 per 1000 livebirths in our study area.
Unexplained deaths
In our group of unexplained deaths, parents were not able togive a
satisfactory explanation for death or give a historyof any illness
like cough, fever, or diarrhoea on the day beforedeath. Most deaths
in this group were in female infantsthreetimes more than that in
boys (33 v 11)and most occurredsoon after birth. Could such
deaths be an extension into theearly neonatal period of female
feticide?
The mean per capita income of families in which infants diedof
unexplained causes was higher than families in which infantsdies
from diarrhoeal diseases. Therefore it seems that anysex
discrimination cannot be explained by extreme poverty.This has also
been shown in a previous study. Booth et al foundthat fetal sex
determination was more common among familieswith higher incomes.18 The sex ratio in different states ofIndia
also bears testimony to this trend. The state of Punjab,which has
one of the highest per capita incomes in India (19 001-22 000 rupees per year)
has one of the lowest sex ratiosin the country (874 females:1000
males), while poor stateslike Bihar and Orissa (4001-7000 rupees per
capita income)have sex ratios of 921 and 972 females per 1000 males,
respectively.1
As this was a retrospective study we could not look at the circumstances
surrounding these unexplained deaths. It would be interestingto know
if there was more malnutrition and a shorter durationof breast
feeding in children who died from unexplained causes.Further
community based prospective studies are needed to examinethese
issues. Though the 1994 act attempted to alter the adversesex ratio
by banning sex determination tests, this cannot changethe attitudes
of people towards female infants. Improved accessto health care and
education of health professionals to payattention to girls would be
beneficial.
What
is already known on this topic
There are more men thanwomen in India
Sex discrimination and bias in favour of malechildren results in selective termination of
female pregnancies
Mortalityis high in female infants,
girls, and young women
What thisstudy adds
There is an excess of female deaths due to easilytreatable conditions
There are a large number of unexplained
female deaths, which may be considered as deaths under
suspiciouscircumstances
Contributors: RK, AK, and JMP designed the study. RK, AK, andJFV collected the data.. RK, AK, and VS analysed the data.RK,
AK, JFV, and JMP wrote the paper. RK is guarantor.
Census of India, 2001. Provisional population totals.
www.censusindia.net (accessed 15
Apr 2003).
Lopez AD, Ruzicka LT, Waldron I. Sex differentials in
mortality. Canberra: Australian National University, 1983.
Kulkarni S. Sex determination tests in India: a survey
report. Radical Journal of Health 1986;1: 99.
Centre for Enquiry into Health and Allied Themes (CEHAT) and
others v/s Union of India and others. Law Journal Supreme Court Cases
2001;5: 577-80.
Ghosh S. The female child in India: a struggle for survival.
Bull Nutr Found India 1987;8: 4.
Claeson M, Bos ER, Mawji T, Pathmanathan I. Reducing child
mortality in India in the new millennium. Bull World Health Organ
2000;78: 1192-9.[ISI][Medline]
Chatterjee M. A report on Indian women from birth to
twenty. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Cooperation and Child
Development, 1990.
Das Gupta M. Selective discrimination against female
children in rural Punjab, India. Popul Dev Rev 1987;13: 77-100.[ISI]
Choudhary R, Sharma A, Agarwal KS, Kumar A, Sreenivas V,
Puliyel JM. Building for the future: influence of housing on intelligence
quotients of children in an urban slum. Health Policy and Planning
2002;17: 420-4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Park K. Indicators of MCH care. In: Park's textbook of
preventive and social medicine. 15th ed. Jabalpur: Banarsidas Bhanot,
1997: 370-80.
Bang AT, Bang RA. Diagnosis of causes of childhood deaths
in developing countries by verbal autopsy: suggested criteria. The SEARCH
team. Bull World Health Organ 1992;70: 499-507.[ISI][Medline]
Datta N, Mand M, Kumar V. Validation of cause of infant
death in the community by autopsy. Indian J Pediatr 1988;55:
599-604.[Medline]
Shrivastava SP, Kumar A, Kumar Ojha A. Verbal autopsy
determined causes of neonatal deaths. Indian Pediatr 2001;38:
1022-5.[Medline]
Registrar General, India. Survey of cause of death
(rural), Indiamanual of instructions, part 1. New Delhi: Vital
Statistics Division, 1991.
Nakajima H. Director-general's message. In: World Health
Report 1996. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1996.
World population prospects: the 1996 revision. New
York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division,
United Nations, 1997.
International Institute for Population Sciences and OCR
Macro. National family health survey (NFHS-2), India 1998-99.
Mumbai, India: IIPS, 2002.
Booth BE, Verma M, Beri RS. Fetal sex determination in
infants in Punjab, India: correlations and implications. BMJ
1994;309: 1259-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"