Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WJP-491HWPW-2&_user=10&_handle=W-WA-A-A-AU-MsSAYZW-UUA-AUCYCZEUDZ-AVEAAVVYY-AU-U&_fmt=full&_coverDate=07%2F09%2F2003&_rdoc=4&_orig=browse&_srch=%23toc%236884%239999%23999999999%2399999!&_cdi=6884&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=575219eb595bc1df52ee90df3d9ef188

Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 54, Issue 4 , August 2003, Pages 310-315



doi:10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00146-4    How to cite or link using doi (opens new window) Cite or link using doi  
Copyright © 2003 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

A comparison of the bacteria found on the hands of `homemakers' and neonatal intensive care unit nurses

A. E. Aielloa, J. Cimiottib, P. Della-Lattac and E. L. LarsonCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, b

a The Joseph L. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
b Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
c Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Received 27 February 2003;  accepted 27 March 2003. ; Available online 9 July 2003.


 

Abstract

This prevalence study was conducted to compare the counts, types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of bacterial flora on the hands of individuals in the community to that of nurses at a nearby university teaching hospital, with an intense hand hygiene regimen. Hand cultures were obtained from 204 individuals during a home visit and 119 nurses in two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The mean total log counts of organisms were 5.73 and 5.24 for the homemakers [defined as the person (usually the mother) who is the primary person responsible for arranging childcare, cooking, cleaning etc] and nurse hands, respectively (P<0.0001). Significantly more homemakers had Acinetobacter lwoffii, Enterobacter cloacae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. fluorescens/putida, and Staphylococcus aureus on their hands compared with the nurses (all P<0.05). However, significantly more nurses had Enterococcus faecalis, S. epidermidis, and S. warneri on their hands (P<0.05). Of note, the hands of nurses harboured significantly more S. epidermidis strains resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, erythromycin, and oxacillin and S. warneri resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, clindamycin, and oxacillin (P<0.05). Surprisingly, significantly more trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant S. epidermidis and ciprofloxacin-resistant S. warneri was recovered from the hands of homemakers (P<0.05). This study demonstrates differences in prevalence, bacterial composition and antimicrobial resistance of hand flora of hospital personnel compared with homemakers. Moreover, the hands of homemakers may serve as community reservoirs for antimicrobial resistant strains of clinical importance.

Author Keywords: Antibiotic resistance hospital; Community hand hygiene

Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-212-305-0723; fax: +1-212-305-0722

 

  Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume 54, Issue 4 , August 2003 , Pages 310-315
Send feedback to ScienceDirect


Software and compilation © 2003 ScienceDirect. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect® is an Elsevier Science B.V. registered trademark.

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.