|
Hemophilus Vaccine Study in Finland Proves a Causal
Relationship Between Vaccines and Diabetes
(published
Autoimmunity 35:247-253,2002)
Dr. J. Bart Classen discovered it would be possible to study
the effect of Hemophilus B immunization on the incidence of IDDM
using data from a large clinical trial in Finland. Dr. J. Bart
Classen and D.C. Classen initiated and funded a collaboration with
Dr. Tuomilehto in Finland. All children born in Finland between
October 1st, 1985 and August 31st, 1987, approximately 116,000 were
randomized to receive 4 doses of the HiB vaccine (PPR-D, Connaught)
starting at 3 months of life or one dose starting at 24 months of
life. Classen and Classen calculated the incidence of IDDM in both
groups through age 10 and in an group which did not receive the HiB
vaccine, a cohort which included all 128,500 children born in
Finland in the 24 months prior to the Hemophilus vaccine study.
Immediately following the completion of these two arms all children
born in Finland over a two year period were randomized to receive 3
doses of the old PPR-D HiB vaccine or 3 doses of a newer HbOC HiB vaccine. The data supports
published findings that the immunization starting after 2 months of
life is associated with an increased incidence of IDDM. Rises in
diabetes have been seen in the UK and USA following the introduction
of the hemophilus vaccine
(see HIB)

Proof that the hemophilus
vaccine causes diabetes is summarized in the graphs and tables
below. Data from the clinical trial (Figures 1 A and 1B) shows
distinct clusters of diabetes caused by the hemophilus vaccine. The
cases of diabetes caused by the vaccine occur in clusters starting
approximately 38 months after immunization and lasting approximately
6-8 months. In these time frames the relative risk exceeds 2,
meaning that the majority of cases of diabetes are caused by the
vaccine. The clustering effect in the
graphs below is very significant since the delay between
immunization and the development of diabetes is identical to the
delay reported by several independent groups between the detection
of autoantibodies to insulin secreting pancreatic islet cells and
the development of diabetes (see Journal of
Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism 16 (4):495-507, 2003)
.
Further support for a causal
relationship is demonstrated in Figures 2 and 3 below. Figure 2
shows the incidence of diabetes in the underlying population in
Finland had been stable in the 5-9 year old population but rose
after routine hemophilus immunization in a predictable manner based
on the clinical trial. Figure 3 shows the hemophilus vaccine
causes diabetes in mice.

Figure 1A.
Children received 4 doses (3,4,6,18 months) or 1 dose (26
months) of the Hemophilus influenza B vaccine and were followed from
birth through age 9 of life (10th birth day) for the development of
IDDM.The graph shows a cluster of cases of diabetes caused by the
hemophilus vaccine occurring 36-42 months after immunization
starting at 3 months of life.

Figure 1B.
Children received 1 dose (26 months) or 0 doses of the Hemophilus
influenza B vaccine. Children were followed from birth through age 9
of life (10th birth day).The graph shows a cluster of cases of
diabetes caused by the vaccine occurring 40 months after the
hemophilus vaccine is given.

Figure 2. The data in this figure provides
support for a causal relationship between immunization with the
hemophilus vaccine and the development of diabetes.
The yearly incidence of IDDM in Finland in children age 5
through age 9 of life from 1982 through 1996 is tabulated in 3 year
averages. The incidence of IDDM in the unvaccinated and vaccinated
group in the clinical trial is compared to the underlying incidence
of IDDM in Finland prior to HiB vaccinated children reaching age 5.
The incidence of IDDM in Finland rose after the vaccinated children
reached age 5 (1994-1996) and the incidence in Finland equaled that
in the vaccinated group from the clinical trial.
This shows the incidence of diabetes
in Finland rose after wide spread use of the hemophilus vaccine, in
a way predicted by the clinical trial.

Figure 3. This figure provides data proving
the hemophilus vaccine in combination with other pediatric vaccines
causes diabetes in mice.
All female NOD mice were injected intrapertioneally
with hepatitis B vaccine injected on
day 3 of life and intramuscularly on day 28 of life. The
"vaccinated" group (n=40) received additional doses of the DTaP,
hemophilus, and inactivated polio vaccines on weeks 10, 16, 22. Mice
in the "control" group (n= 37) were injected with saline
intramuscularly on weeks 10, 16, 22. Mice for followed for the
development of IDDM from week 10 to week 32.The
data shows there were more cases of diabetes, fewer diabetes free
mice, in the group receiving the hemophilus vaccine.

The graph above shows that there is a dosing effect, with the
highest incidence of diabetes in the group receiving 4 doses of
vaccine followed by the group receiving 1 dose.
The data is tabulated below.
4 DOSES 1 DOSE 0 Dose
Population 59,024 56,921 128,532
Cases Cumulative Cases Cumulative Cases Cumulative
IDDM Incidence IDDM Incidence IDDM Incidence
100,000 100,000 100,000
Age
0 to 7 154 261 135 237 266 207**
0 to 10 235 398 214 376 437 340
0 to 5 98 166 83 146 180 140
0 to 2 21 36 21 37 33 26
5 to 10 137 232 131 230 257 200
2 to 7 133 225 114 200 233 181
2 to 5 77 130 62 109 147 114
5 to 7 56 95 52 91 86 67
**The results are statistically significant at 7 years of life
(7 years was the primary, prospective endpoint of the study).
The graphs below shows A rise in diabetes was seen in both children under 5 and over 5.


The data below shows that the incidence of diabetes in
Finland had been constant in children 5 through 9 years of age for
approximately 10 years. The incidence of IDDM rose dramatically in
this population when the Hemophilus vaccinated children entered this
age group. This supports a causal relationship between the vaccine
and IDDM.

The effect of Hemophilus vaccine on insulin dependent
diabetes (IDDM) appears to be huge. Over 24,000 children may develop
IDDM from the Hemophilus vaccine over a 10 year period in the US.
The actual number may be even larger since the data from Finland was
derived from studying a weak, early generation Hemophilus vaccine
and newer vaccines may be more diabetogenic. The incidence of IDDM
has increased in Finland as these new vaccines have been added to
the immunization schedule (see above).

|