Biotech Vs. Bacteria
Antibiotics,
The Next Generation
Matthew Herper, 07.11.03, 7:00 AM ET
NEW YORK - Few things are as
inexorable as the march of bacterial resistance. When a person
or animal is given an antibiotic, it kills enough pathogens to
cure the illness. But bacteria that have mutated so they can
resist the drug survive. The next time these bacteria cause an
infection, the antibiotic is less likely to work. But that is
drawing some biotech companies into the antibiotic research.
"Vertex thinks of antibiotics as
the eternal drug category," says
Joshua Boger, chief executive of Cambridge,
Mass.-based Vertex Pharmaceuticals (nasdaq:
VRTX -
news -
people ). "After all of mankind's other diseases have been
cured or treated with breakthrough drugs of the future, we
will still need new antibiotics because bacteria are so adept
at evading and escaping control."
In 1977, Michael Jacobs, now the
director of clinical microbiology at Case Western Reserve
University, documented the first cases of resistance of
Streptococcus pneumoniae, a common cause of pneumonia, ear
and sinus infections, to several classes of antibiotics.
Twenty-six years later, S. pneumoniae can resist a
whole host of drugs. Amoxicillin, an antibiotic developed by
GlaxoSmithKline (nyse:
GSK -
news -
people ) but available generically, is still the first
choice for treating it. But Jacobs notes that in a quarter of
a century, the standard dosage of amoxicillin has increased
fourfold as bacteria have developed ways to resist it.
Doctors give antibiotics 50% more
often than they should, allowing bacteria to mutate even
faster. A less toxic, more convenient drug can actually make
the problem worse. Jacobs has been a vocal opponent of the use
of Pfizer's (nyse:
PFE -
news -
people ) Zithromax, an antibiotic that can be given over
fewer days--or even in a single big, convenient dose. "It's a
very safe drug," says Jacobs. "It doesn't have many side
effects. If you have a patient who doesn't need antibiotics,
that's a good drug to prescribe. The problem is, those
patients don't need antibiotics in the first place."
Some studies have shown that as much
as 31% of S. pneumoniae is now resistant to Zithromax.
Since bacteria are persistent, it's good news that companies
like Vertex are developing new antibacterial drugs in the lab.
It means that even after a decade or so of development, there
will still be a market for new antibiotics.
| |
 |
At Vertex
Pharmaceuticals, Paul Charifson is pursuing a new
way to knock out gyrase, an enzyme bacteria.
|
Vertex decided to get into the
antibacterial field four years ago, says Paul S. Charifson,
a principal investigator at Vertex who heads a group of
chemists designing new antibiotic drug candidates. Resistance
rates were rising, he notes, and there didn't seem to be much
competition.
"Big pharma seemed to be less
interested in doing antibiotic drug development," says
Charifson. Within a year, he had settled on a promising
strategy. He would look for molecules that would knock out
gyrase, an enzyme bacteria used in DNA replication.
The gyrase molecule is the target of
fluoroquinolones, a best-selling class of antibiotics that
includes Johnson & Johnson's (nyse:
JNJ -
news -
people ) Levaquin and Bayer's (nyse:
BAY -
news -
people ) Cipro. Gyrase is built a bit like a
flashlight--one end does work essential to replicating
bacterial DNA, while the other harnesses energy like an
intracellular battery pack. Levaquin, Cipro and their peers
knock out the light bulb, but Charifson had another idea--why
not disconnect the batteries? He set about looking for
molecules that would cut off gyrase's energy supply.
He had a stroke of luck when he found
that another molecule similar to gyrase could be inhibited by
the same molecule, making his drug candidates more toxic to
bacteria. An added bonus--inhibiting both of these molecules
makes it less likely that bacteria would be able to figure out
a way to evade the new drug.
Aventis' (nyse:
AVE -
news -
people ) Ketek, a new drug that has not yet been approved
in the U.S., decreases resistance by hitting two different
spots on a single enzyme. "They're expanding the contact zone
in the same site," says Charifson. "We're targeting a
completely different enzyme."
Charifson's strategy would knock out
two completely different molecules, both of which the bacteria
need. That could be like giving two drugs at once. In the lab,
bacteria are having trouble coming up with ways to resist it.
Now begins the long process of trying out versions of
Charifson's molecules in animals and people.
|